Cases

280 Kan. 85 (2005) ISAAC JOHN SOUTH, a minor, by and through his parents and next friends JOHN SOUTH and LINDA SOUTH Appellants, v. JAMES JOHNSON AUBREY MCCARTER, a minor, and MARK MCCARTER and JILL MCCARTER, his natural guardians; JOSHUA ALLEN MILLS, a minor, and LORETTA KAY TINDELL and MICHAEL ALLEN MILLS, his natural guardians; AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and S AND J INVESTMENTS OF TOPEKA, INC., Appellees. N

289 B.R. 759 (2002) In re Robbie McCARTER and Melissa McCarter, Debtors. Neal Boucher, Mariano Decola and Mariano Cappeli, Plaintiffs, v. Robbie McCarter, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Bar W Motor Company, LLC, J.A. Whittenburg III, and Peter White, Third-Party Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 7-02-11549 MA, Adversary No. 02-1136 M. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico.

WOODALL, Justice. Black Warrior Electric Membership Corporation (“Black Warrior”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Ronald McCarter in McCarter’s action seeking compensation for injuries he sustained when he contacted a power line owned and operated by Black Warrior. We reverse and remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background This case arose out of an acc

OPINION OF THE COURT TASHIMA, Circuit Judge. Appellants Bruce Marks and Marks, LLC d/b/a Marks & Solokov, LLC (together, “Marks”), appeal the District Court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. We will affirm.1 I. This tale of international deception, revenge, and defamation begins in 2001, when Norex Pet

615 F.Supp.2d 375 (2009) Bruce S. MARKS, et al. v. ALFA GROUP, et al. Civil Action No. 08-5651. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 11, 2009. *376 Bruce S. Marks, Thomas C. Sullivan, Maria Temkin, Marks & Sokolov, LLC, George Bochetto, Bochetto & Lentz, PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Bruce S. Marks. Ele

Barnes, Judge, dissenting. Because I believe the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Morris, Schneider & Prior, LLC, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. 1. I agree with the majority that the statements in McCalla, Raymer &c. v. C.I.T. Financial Svcs., 235 Ga. App. 95 (508 SE2d 471) (1998), relied on by the defendant are not controlling precedent. H

OPINION MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION This is an appeal from a judgment enfore-ing a property settlement agreement that had been earlier incorporated into a dissolution decree. The appellant claims that the superior court failed to make findings required by statute, erred in failing to vacate ambiguous provisions of the agreement

466 N.W.2d 562 (1991) Mark Alan McCARTER, Appellant, v. Earl R. POMEROY, as Insurance Commissioner for the State of North Dakota, Appellee. Civ. No. 900233. Supreme Court of North Dakota. February 21, 1991. *563 Thomas O. Smith, of Zuger, Kirmis, Bolinske & Smith, Bismarck, for appellant. Appearance by Brent J. Edison, Bismar

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal from a judgment of the district court, dismissing on grounds of res judicata and the statute of limitations, a securities fraud suit, brought under the civil RICO statute and federal securities law, presents three interesting questions. First, we must determine whether a dismissal for failure to file a complaint within the time limit set by the state court cons

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted. LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., dissent.

MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP v. JARROW FORMULAS, INC. (SC 21013) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff law firm sought to recover from the defendant, a former client, for, inter alia, breach of contract in federal court. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut certified to this court a question of law concerning whether a law firm can recover com

883 P.2d 986 (1994) Mick McCARTER, Appellant, v. ALASKA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. S-5746. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 4, 1994. *988 Steven L. Hempel, Mark Clayton Choate Law Offices, Juneau, for appellant. Randall J. Weddle and Matthew D. Regan, Faulkner, Banfield, Doogan & Holmes, Anchorage, for

954 N.E.2d 718 (2011) 352 Ill. Dec. 635 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brandon McCARTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-09-2864. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. June 24, 2011. Rehearing Denied July 26, 2011. *721 Michael J. Pelletier, S

OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment based on a suit originally filed on a sworn account but tried, by implied consent, as a contract matter. We reform the judgment and affirm the trial court. *Page 466 Appellant Beall had been an insurance salesman for appellee and operated as an independent contractor. Policies sold by appellant were turned over to appellee, and appellant would receive a commission. Appellee

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. McCarter, 2011 IL App (1st) 092864 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption BRANDON McCARTER, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Sixth Division Docket No. 1–09–2864 Filed June

MEMORANDUM OPINION John F. Grady, United States District Judge : Before the court are defendant’s motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and for summary judgment on Count II of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons explained below, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and the motion fo

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLOTTE McCARTER Extraordinary Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 14694-II, 15281-II Richard R. Vance, Judge No. E2010-02127-CCA-R10-CD - Filed November 18, 2011 In this extraordinary appeal, the Defendant-Appellant, Charlotte McCarter, appeals th

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Vivian McCarter (“plaintiff’ or “McCarter”) brings this action against The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY”), Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (“BANA”), Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC (“BGW”), Mortgage Electronic Registration Syst

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2006 Session GARY WEAVER, ET AL. v. THOMAS R. MCCARTER, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. 98-0425-3 D.J. Alissandratos, Chancellor No. W2004-02803-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 6, 2006 Plaintiffs Gary and Gail Weaver filed suit against Coldwell Banker H

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission REVERSES the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award and enters the following Amended Opinion and Award. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and conclud