Cases

BARNES, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. On September 16, 2008, Tommie Jordan pleaded guilty to burglary of a dwelling. The Monroe County Circuit Court sentenced him to twenty-five years, with five years to be served in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), twenty years suspended, and five years of post-release supervision (PRS). He was also ordered to pay fines and re

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. WALD, Circuit Judge: On April 9, 1996, President Clinton removed appellant Robert H. Swan (“Swan”) from his position as a member of the Board of the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”) and, using his recess appointment clause powers, appointed Yolanda T. Wheat (“Wheat”)

SMITH, Presiding Judge. Appellants, the St. Louis Police Officers’ Association and three individual police officers, appeal from the trial court’s refusal to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus against the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis. The St. Louis Police Officers’ Association is a voluntary not-for-profit association whose membership includes a majority of the police officers employed by the Board.

WELCH, Judge. The appellant, Christie Michelle Scott, was indicted for three counts of capital murder in connection with a fire at her house that resulted in the death of her six-year-old son Mason. Count Í of the indictment charged that Scott murdered Mason for pecuniary gain or other valuable consideration, i.e., the proceeds of a life-insurance policy, a violation of § 13A-5-40(a)(7), Ala.Code 1975; Count II charged that

MEMORANDUM NANGLE, Senior District Judge. This matter is now before the Court on the joint motion of Missouri and the United States to enter two consent decrees formulated in lengthy negotiations with two groups of the principal corporate defendants in this action, the Syntex defendants1 and the NEPACCO *561defendants.<

Opinion SULLIVAN, J. The defendant, Eric Floyd, was convicted, after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a),1 commission of a class A, B or C felony with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53-202k,2 and criminal possession of a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217.3

685 S.W.2d 913 (1984) ST. LOUIS POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, a not for profit corporation, Donald Schnable, Paul Rea and James Conner, Appellants, v. Homer E. SAYAD, Charles Valier, Thomas W. Purcell, Robert F. Wintersmith, comprising the membership of the Board of Police, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Respondents. No. 48258. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.<

846 F.Supp. 1330 (1993) Marla GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 92 C 5284. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. August 25, 1993. Opinion Granting Reconsideration in Part September 22, 1993. *1331 *1332

Recess Appointments Issues [The follow ing m em orandum reviews a num ber of legal and constitutional issues relating to the President's power to make appointm ents during a recess of the Senate, concluding that there have been no developm ents which call into question the conclusions of a I960 Attorney General o p in io n ,41 O p A tt’y G e n . 463. It also contrasts the language, effects and purposes o f the Pocket Veto and Recess Appointm ents Clause

484 S.W.2d 641 (1972) STATE of Missouri ex rel. R. J. KING, Jr., Individually and as a Member of the Class of Registered and Qualified Voters and Electors of the State of Missouri, Relator, v. Eugene WALSH et al., Respondents, Christopher S. (Kit) Bond, Intervenor-Respondent. No. 58037. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. August 5, 1972. Dissenting Opinions

389 U.S. 143 (1967) HACKIN v. ARIZONA ET AL. No. 523. Supreme Court of United States. Decided November 13, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. PER CURIAM. The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR.