Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “McBride v. Boston Scientific Corporation”
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. : LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. :
Kewaunee Scientific Corp. v. RAGUSA & SONpublic domain
723 So.2d 470 (1998) KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION v. CHARLES RAGUSA & SON, INC. and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. No. 97 CA 1823. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 25, 1998. *471 James S. Holliday, Jr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, David L. Tank, appearing pro hac vice, Atlanta, GA, Counsel fo
Quinton Brown v. Nucor Corporationpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1779 QUINTON BROWN; JASON GUY; ALVIN SIMMONS; SHELDON SINGLETARY; GERALD WHITE; RAMON ROANE; JACOB RAVENELL, individually and on behalf of the class they seek to represent, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NUCOR CORPORATION; NUCOR STEEL-BERKELEY, Defendants - Appelle
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BORK. BORK, Circuit Judge: Appellant William G. McBride, an Australian expert in the field of teratology— the study of agents that can cause developmental abnormalities in embryos — challenges the dismissal of his defamation action for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The alleged def
Phillips v. Awh Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1269, -1286 EDWARD H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., and LOFTON CORPORATION, Defendants-Cross Appellants. Carl F. M
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Crosspublic domain
415 F.3d 130375 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Edward H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, Hopeman Brothers, INC., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants. 03-1269, -1286 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT July 12, 2005, DecidedAs Amended July 14, 2005.Cert. denied by AWH Corp. v. Phillips, (Feb. 21, 2006)Appealed from Philli
McBride v. Merrell Dow and Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
613 F.Supp. 1349 (1985) William G. McBRIDE, M.D., Plaintiff, v. MERRELL DOW AND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 81-2639. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 13, 1985. *1350 Allen T. Eaton, W. David Allen, Allen T. Eaton & Associates, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Robert X.
TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND.1199 II. ANALYSIS.1202 A. Procedural Challenges.1202 1. Kennecott’s Freedom of Information Act claim.1202 2. Kenneeott’s Federal Register Act claim.1203 3. Kenneeott’s APA claim.1207 4. Industry Petitio
Tillery, S. v. The Children's Hospital of Phila.public domain
OPINION BY PLATT, J.: Appellants, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Monica Goyal, M.D., appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Shantice Tillery, in her own right and as parent and natural guardian on behalf of her minor son, Sha-mir D. Tillery (Minor-Plaintiff), pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We affirm.
Jones v. Hanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of the falsification of drug tests at the William F. Hinton Drug Laboratory in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, by chemist Annie Dookhan. In 2010, plaintiff David Jones was convicted of distribution of crack cocaine and sentenced to a term of imprison
Broadsoft, Inc. v. Callwave Commc'ns, LLCpublic domain
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Patent Ineligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (D.I. 290) and related briefing (D.I. 291, 366, 385) and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Broadworks (D.I. 304) and related br
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. Biolitec, Inc.public domain
603 F.Supp.2d 251 (2009) AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Laserscope, Plaintiffs v. BIOLITEC, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 07-30109-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 20, 2009. *254 Patrick V. Bradley, Leland G. Hansen, Edward A. Mas, II, Ronald H. Spuhler, McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Wi
Lakefront Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Pappaspublic domain
JUSTICE McBRIDE delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioner-appellant, Lakefront Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Lakefront), seeks reversal of the trial court’s determination that it was not entitled to an indemnity award for the loss of its property under section 21 — 305(a)(2) of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS
United States v. Dereck McClellanpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-2251 Doc: 77 Filed: 08/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DERECK MCCLELLAN; YVONNE SILVER,
Morgan v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant Medtronic, Inc.’s (“Medtronic”), Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“12(c) Motion”) pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt.5). For the reasons explained below,. the Court finds that Medtronic’s 12(c) Motion should be GRANTED in its entirety. Accor
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.public domain
ORDER JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) moves to exclude testimony of Charles R. Donohoe and Dr. R. Sukumar. (Microsoft Mot. (Dkt. # 396).) Mr. Donohoe is an expert who offers his opinion as to a reasonable and non discriminatory (“RAND”) royalty for Defendants Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and General Instrument Corpora
Murphy v. Aero-Med, Ltd.public domain
345 F.Supp.2d 40 (2004) Linda F. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. AERO-MED, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 98-40100-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 21, 2004. *41 Heather V. Baer, Sally & Fitch, Boston, MA, Jeniffer A.P. Carson, Governo Law Firm, LLC, Boston, MA, Peter M. Durney, Cornell & Gollub, B
United States v. Dental Dreams, LLCpublic domain
Judith C. Herrera, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on (i) the Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 112), filed by Defendants on November 10, 2017; (ii) Defendants' Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Witness (ECF No. 111), filed November *123310, 2017;
Crowe v. Examworks, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs here are a group.of former and present employees of .the defendants ExamWorks and MES Group, Inc., an en*22tity that was acquired by ExamWorks in 2012. They allege that they were not paid for overtime work in violation of the federal fair labor standards and Massachus
Lulac v. Andrew Wheelerpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN No. 17-71636 AMERICAN CITIZENS; PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA; NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE OPINION COUNCIL; CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION; FARMWORKERS ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA; FARMWORKER JUSTICE GREENLATINOS; LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT; LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA; NATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSO