⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “McBride v. Boston Scientific Corporation”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. : LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. :
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998-09-25 · Published · cited 2× · 723 So. 2d 470; 1998 WL 682666
723 So.2d 470 (1998) KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION v. CHARLES RAGUSA & SON, INC. and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. No. 97 CA 1823. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 25, 1998. *471 James S. Holliday, Jr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, David L. Tank, appearing pro hac vice, Atlanta, GA, Counsel fo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-05-11 · Published · cited 133× · 785 F.3d 895; 91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1169; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7739; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,306; 126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1793
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1779 QUINTON BROWN; JASON GUY; ALVIN SIMMONS; SHELDON SINGLETARY; GERALD WHITE; RAMON ROANE; JACOB RAVENELL, individually and on behalf of the class they seek to represent, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NUCOR CORPORATION; NUCOR STEEL-BERKELEY, Defendants - Appelle
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983-09-27 · Published · cited 32× · 717 F.2d 1460; 230 U.S. App. D.C. 403; 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2225; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16533
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BORK. BORK, Circuit Judge: Appellant William G. McBride, an Australian expert in the field of teratology— the study of agents that can cause developmental abnormalities in embryos — challenges the dismissal of his defamation action for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The alleged def
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1269, -1286 EDWARD H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., and LOFTON CORPORATION, Defendants-Cross Appellants. Carl F. M
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006-02-21 · Published · cited 3308× · 415 F.3d 1303
415 F.3d 130375 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Edward H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, Hopeman Brothers, INC., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants. 03-1269, -1286 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT July 12, 2005, DecidedAs Amended July 14, 2005.Cert. denied by AWH Corp. v. Phillips, (Feb. 21, 2006)Appealed from Philli
District Court, District of Columbia · 1985-06-13 · Published · cited 3× · 613 F. Supp. 1349; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12144
613 F.Supp. 1349 (1985) William G. McBRIDE, M.D., Plaintiff, v. MERRELL DOW AND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 81-2639. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 13, 1985. *1350 Allen T. Eaton, W. David Allen, Allen T. Eaton & Associates, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Robert X.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996-08-05 · Published · cited 168× · 88 F.3d 1191; 319 U.S. App. D.C. 128
TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND.1199 II. ANALYSIS.1202 A. Procedural Challenges.1202 1. Kennecott’s Freedom of Information Act claim.1202 2. Kenneeott’s Federal Register Act claim.1203 3. Kenneeott’s APA claim.1207 4. Industry Petitio
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-02-28 · Published · cited 37× · 156 A.3d 1233; 2017 Pa. Super. 50; 2017 WL 769822; 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134
OPINION BY PLATT, J.: Appellants, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Monica Goyal, M.D., appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Shantice Tillery, in her own right and as parent and natural guardian on behalf of her minor son, Sha-mir D. Tillery (Minor-Plaintiff), pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We affirm.
Jones v. Hanpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 993 F. Supp. 2d 57; 2014 WL 320575; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10202
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of the falsification of drug tests at the William F. Hinton Drug Laboratory in Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, by chemist Annie Dookhan. In 2010, plaintiff David Jones was convicted of distribution of crack cocaine and sentenced to a term of imprison
District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 282 F. Supp. 3d 771
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Patent Ineligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (D.I. 290) and related briefing (D.I. 291, 366, 385) and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Broadworks (D.I. 304) and related br
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-03-20 · Published · cited 1× · 603 F. Supp. 2d 251; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24379; 2009 WL 738858
603 F.Supp.2d 251 (2009) AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Laserscope, Plaintiffs v. BIOLITEC, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 07-30109-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 20, 2009. *254 Patrick V. Bradley, Leland G. Hansen, Edward A. Mas, II, Ronald H. Spuhler, McAndrews Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Wi
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 356 Ill. App. 3d 343; 826 N.E.2d 464; 292 Ill. Dec. 323; 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 209
JUSTICE McBRIDE delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioner-appellant, Lakefront Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Lakefront), seeks reversal of the trial court’s determination that it was not entitled to an indemnity award for the loss of its property under section 21 — 305(a)(2) of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-08-10 · Published · cited 8× · 44 F.4th 200
USCA4 Appeal: 20-2251 Doc: 77 Filed: 08/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DERECK MCCLELLAN; YVONNE SILVER,
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 5× · 172 F. Supp. 3d 959; 2016 WL 1162400
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant Medtronic, Inc.’s (“Medtronic”), Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“12(c) Motion”) pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt.5). For the reasons explained below,. the Court finds that Medtronic’s 12(c) Motion should be GRANTED in its entirety. Accor
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012-10-22 · Published · cited 8× · 904 F. Supp. 2d 1109; 2012 WL 5248439
ORDER JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) moves to exclude testimony of Charles R. Donohoe and Dr. R. Sukumar. (Microsoft Mot. (Dkt. # 396).) Mr. Donohoe is an expert who offers his opinion as to a reasonable and non discriminatory (“RAND”) royalty for Defendants Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and General Instrument Corpora
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004-10-21 · Published · cited 7× · 345 F. Supp. 2d 40; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23669; 2004 WL 2668750
345 F.Supp.2d 40 (2004) Linda F. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. AERO-MED, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 98-40100-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 21, 2004. *41 Heather V. Baer, Sally & Fitch, Boston, MA, Jeniffer A.P. Carson, Governo Law Firm, LLC, Boston, MA, Peter M. Durney, Cornell & Gollub, B
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 9× · 307 F. Supp. 3d 1224
Judith C. Herrera, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on (i) the Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 112), filed by Defendants on November 10, 2017; (ii) Defendants' Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Witness (ECF No. 111), filed November *123310, 2017;
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 7× · 136 F. Supp. 3d 16; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132913; 2015 WL 5749441
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs here are a group.of former and present employees of .the defendants ExamWorks and MES Group, Inc., an en*22tity that was acquired by ExamWorks in 2012. They allege that they were not paid for overtime work in violation of the federal fair labor standards and Massachus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 5× · 899 F.3d 814
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN No. 17-71636 AMERICAN CITIZENS; PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA; NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE OPINION COUNCIL; CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION; FARMWORKERS ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA; FARMWORKER JUSTICE GREENLATINOS; LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT; LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA; NATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSO