Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “McAfee, Inc v. Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr, LLP”
Tviim, LLC v. McAfee, Inc.public domain
REYNA, Circuit Judge. TVIIM, LLC (“TVIIM”) sued McAfee, Inc. (“McAfee!’) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,889,168 (“’168 patent”). A jury determined that McAfee did not infringe the T68 patent and that the T68 patent was invalid. After the jury verdict, TVIIM filed motions for judgment as a matter
Voda v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Voda v. Medtronic Inc.public domain
ORDER TIM LEONARD, District Judge. Plaintiff, Dr. Jan K. Voda, is the holder of United States Patent No. 6,083,213 (“the '213 patent”), which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 4, 2000. Exhibit 1 to Complaint (Doc. No. 1). The '213 patent contains method claims; that is, it relates to plaintiffs inventive technique for using a guiding catheter to perform angioplast
SUPERIOR COURT JOHN W. BALDWIN, JR., ROBERT N. BALDWIN, JAMES R. BALDWIN, AND JOHN E. BALDWIN v. THOMAS P. CONNOR, JR., MARIA H. CONNOR, JOHN J. CONNOR, II, NICHOLAS KOURTIS, POLYVINYL FILMS, INC., AND INDUSOL, INC. Docket: 1984CV03396-BLS2
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
In Re Cornerstone Healthcare Holding Group, Inc.public domain
Opinion by Justice MURPHY, dissenting. Under fundamental principles of contract interpretation and precedent of this Court, I would conclude the forum-selection clauses in the APA and in the Note cannot be blended into one transaction for purposes of this fraudulent transfer lawsuit brought by the holder of the Note (Mariner) against two nonsignatories (Cornerstone and Highland). The majority,
Miller v. Holzmannpublic domain
471 F.Supp.2d 119 (2007) Richard F. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Philipp HOLZMANN, et al., Defendants. CA No. 95-01231 (RCL/JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 23, 2007. *120 Robert B. Bell, Gregory B. Reece, Howard M. Shapiro, Jennifer M. O'Connor, Jonathan Goldman Cedarbaum, Matthew B. Baumgartner, Michae
United States v. Goyalpublic domain
629 F.3d 912 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prabhat GOYAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10436. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 12, 2010. Filed December 10, 2010. *913 Amber S. Rosen (argued), Brian Stretch, Elise Becker, Assistant United States A
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
Miller v. Holzmannpublic domain
(2008) Richard F. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Philipp HOLZMANN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-1231 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Ironically enough, this sordid tale of filthy dealing and dirty money began in the sewers of Cairo. After the
Craig v. Lewpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA B.B. CRAIG, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 14-1340 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 110, 120, 121, 129
In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigationpublic domain
174 F.Supp.2d 70 (2001) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 28, 2001. *71 *72 Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel: Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Saferstein, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &