⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Maxie v. Horizon Lines, LLC”

Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:55 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded FILED as precedent or cited before any court except Jun 23 2020, 9:18 am for the purpose of establishing the defense of CLERK res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of Indiana Supreme Court
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 3× · 53 F. Supp. 3d 1043; 2014 WL 5035213
MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant Dean Transportation, Inc. (“DTI”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32), to which the plaintiff, James Finn, has filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 34), and DTI filed a Reply (Docket No. 39).1 Finn has also filed a Moti
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00697-CV 4609055 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS SEE AMENDED BRF AUSTIN, TEXAS FLD ON 6/22/15
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 17× · 21 F. Supp. 3d 657; 2014 A.M.C. 2113; 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20200; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123245
*663FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PHASE ONE TRIAL CARL BARBIER, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule, of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court enters these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law relative to the Phase One trial. If any finding is in truth a conclusion of law, or if any conclusion stated is in truth a finding of fact, it sh
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00697-CV 5770093 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 6× · 512 B.R. 19; 2014 WL 2624987; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 2577
MEMORANDUM JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Mark G. DeGiacomo, the Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) of Inofin Incorpo*25rated (“Inofín”) filed a Complaint against Raymond C. Green, Inc. (“RCG”) on April 25, 2011, one day before this Court conducted a hearing on RCG’s Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay and for
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 22-13129 Document: 88-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2026 Page: 1 of 211 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13129 ____________________ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,