Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

DiPENTIMA, C.J. *838 *1239 The defendant, Mary E. Bagnaschi, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of breach of the peace in the second degree in violation of G

February 8, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 47 341 Conn. 233 FEBRUARY, 2022 233 State v. Bermudez STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. NOEL BERMUDEZ (SC 20461) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js.

768 F.Supp.2d 401 (2011) Maureen REGAN, Plaintiff, v. Paula W. CONWAY, Defendant. No. CV 07-3207 (ADS)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 2, 2011. *402 Mark S. Frey, Esq., NY, for Plaintiff. Scott Michael Kessler, Esq., Elissa Paulette Fudim, Esq., of Counsel, Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, New York, NY, fo

78 F.Supp.2d 1246 (2000) Brenda J. KENNEDY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 89-T-196-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 13, 2000. *1247 James U. Blacksher, Birmingham, AL, Leslie Proll, Washington, DC, Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Whatley Drake

884 A.2d 915 (2005) Patricia JONES, Appellee, v. Ellen Boring JONES, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued August 31, 2005. Filed September 30, 2005. Kenneth R. Williams, Doylestown, for appellant. *916 Maureen T. Gatto, BenSalem and Alphonso B. David, New York City, for appellee. BEFORE: KLEIN, PANELLA

Talmadge, J. In this case we review the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board’s (the Board) unanimous recommendation of a two-year suspension of an attorney’s license to practice law. The recommendation is based on two principal areas of misconduct— the attorney’s mishandling of a client’s personal injury settlement and his sexual exploitation of that client. James Heard negotiated a sett

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ Nos. 18-2865 & 19-2243 ________________ NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND v. AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORPORATION; BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS, INC. a/k/a Beckman Coulter Inc.; CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, IN

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J. These consolidated actions arise out of a dispute over the estate of the late Sarah P. McGeoghean of Cambridge. The disputants are her five surviving children, who are, in descending order of age, John, Kevin, Terrence and Timothy Mc-Geoghean and Maureen Fahey. Sarah died in September 2004. Shortly thereafter, Timothy filed for probate a will dated September 10, 2004, and in October 2004 John and Kevin f

ORDER DENYING OBJECTORS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) PECHMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Objectors’ (Matt Brody, Ronald Drucker and Josephine Drucker) Motion for and Order Directing the Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Lead Plaintiff California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“CalSTRS

2026 IL App (3d) 250071 Opinion filed March 5, 2026 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2026 LAURIE HEIDEN, as Independent ) Administrator of the Estate of Matthew Heiden,

515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION YOUNG, District Judge. The plaintiff, Sheilah Mahan (“Mahan”), brings this employment discrimination action against her employer, the Boston Water and Sewer Commission (“the Commission”) and her supervisors Ralph Donofrio (“Donofrio”) and Joseph Foley (“Foley”) (collectively “the Defendants”). At the summary judgment hearing on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment,

963 P.2d 818 (1998) 136 Wash.2d 405 In re DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST James A. HEARD, Attorney at Law, Bar No. 12272. No. 12272-5. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued March 11, 1998. Decided September 24, 1998. *820 Washington State Bar Association, Maureen T. Devlin, Randy V. Beitel,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI ) TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0466-JTL

SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)