Cases

O’Connell, J. The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decision on her motion to modify child support. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to consider the child support guidelines where the modification was based on earning capacity rather than actual earnings, and (2) refused to consider the defendant’s second wife’s income in computing the child support to be ordered. At oral argument, the plain

HJELM, J. [¶ 1] Maureen D. Davis appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Skowhegan, 1 Stanfill, J. ) dismissing, for lack of standing, her complaint seeking to be determined a de facto parent of her grandson. See 19-A M.R.S. § 1891(2) (2017). Davis argues that the court erred by conclu

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Friends to Elect Colleen M. O’Toole (Colleen M. O’Toole’s judicial campaign committee), appeals from the June 3, 2015 opinion and order of the district court denying its motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of Rule 4.4(E) of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. Rule 4.4(E) imposes a temporal rest

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2018 ME 72 Docket: Som-17-240 Argued: December 13, 2017 Decided: May 24, 2018 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. MAUREEN D. DAVIS v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Maureen McPadden, Plaintiff v. Case No. 14-cv-475-SM Opinion No. 2016 DNH 160 Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Defendant O R D E R Maureen McPadden brought suit against her former employer, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (“Walmart”), advancing numerous state and federal workp

381 B.R. 95 (2008) In re TOUCH AMERICA HOLDINGS; INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 03-11915(KJC). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 22, 2008. *97 *98 Alfred Villoch, III, Buchanan Ingersoll PC, Ashley B. Stitzer, The Bayard Firm, Edmon L. Morton, Edward J. Kosmowski, Robert S

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal demands that we mull the prerequisites for liability under the Ku Klux Klan Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (1994). We hold that (1) the class-based animus required to ground a private right of action under the statute applies to conspiracies allegedly involving public officials in the same way as it applies to all other conspiracies; and (2) the require

JUSTICE LINDBERG delivered the opinion of the court: Respondent, Carol Carey, the natural mother of the minor child, Brendan Carey, and the former spouse of Brendan’s natural father, the deceased John Carey, appeals from the judgment of the circuit court of Du Page County finding in a modification of custody proceeding pursu

986 P.2d 323 (1999) 133 Idaho 300 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marcus MATHEWS, Defendant-Appellant, Marcus W. Mathews, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of Idaho, Respondent. Nos. 24604, 24605. Supreme Court of Idaho. Moscow, September 1998 Term. June 15, 1999. Rehearing Denied September 8, 1999.

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: After questioning Jairo Ferino Sanchez and learning that he had entered the country illegally, state police officers detained and then transported him to Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). An Immigration Judge ("IJ"), in a decision affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), rejected Sanchez's motion to suppress the statements he m

JUSTICE KOEHLER delivered the opinion of the court: The petitioner in this custody modification action, Linda Brudd, appeals the Will County circuit court’s order transferring the custody of her minor child to the respondent, Frank Brudd. We must decide whether the circuit court abused its discretion in determining there was a ma

521 F.Supp.2d 750 (2007) Willie HUGHES, Petitioner, v. Terry McCANN, Respondent. No. 07 C 818. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 27, 2007. *751 *752 Willie Hughes, Joliet, IL, Pro se. Erin Maureen O'Connell, Illinois Attorney General's Office, Chicago,

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. At issue in this appeal is the validity of Suffolk County’s term limit law pertaining to the office of district attorney. Petitioners allege that, as a consequence of such local law, respondent District Attorney Thomas J. Spota III is ineligible to hold the office he seeks. We conclude that the County is without the power to regulate the number of terms the district attorney

409 B.R. 712 (2009) In re TOUCH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC, et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 03-11915(KJC). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. July 30, 2009. *714 Alfred Villoch, III, Buchanan Ingersoll PC, Ashley B. Stitzer, Bayard, P.A., Edmon L. Morton, Edward J. Kosmowski, Maureen D. Luke, Robert S. Brady, Young, Conaway, Star

940 A.2d 947 (2008) FARMERS FOR FAIRNESS, an unincorporated association of landowners, Delaware State Farm Bureau, Inc., John Carey, Henry Carey, Mary Moore, Agnes Heather, Cartanza Farms Limited Partnership, Sandra L. Cartanza, E.Z. Farms, Inc., Harman Brothers, LLC, Joseph A. Messina, Jr., Janet Messina, John Messina, Maureen Messina, and Thomas E. Webb, Plaintiffs, v. KENT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Delaware, Kent County L

351 B.R. 313 (2006) In re INSILCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Debtor. Amphenol Corporation and Amphenol Technical Products International Co., Plaintiff, v. Chad Shandler, as Trustee of the Insilco Liquidating Trust — Unsecured Creditors Series, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-13672 (KJC), Adversary No. 05-52403 (KJC). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. September 18,

RIGGS, J. Defendant Ferris (defendant) appeals from that part of a judgment dismissing his counterclaims. He argues that the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff and defendant were not partners or joint venturers in a real estate deal, and, as a consequence, failed to provide for dissolution of the partnership. Plaintiff1 and defendant State of Oregon Public Employes’ Retirement Fund (OPERF)

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA EUGENE FAIR, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner February 15, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 22-ICA-279 (JCN: 2021023122) INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

PD-1627-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/29/2014 9:05:12 AM Accepted 12/30/2014 9:59:38 AM

Lenk, J. We are called upon in this case to construe for the first time G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30, the corporate dissolution statute. That statute allows a shareholder to petition a judge of the Superior Court to dissolve a corporation in the event of a deadlock between its directors. See G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30 (2) (i). George T. Koshy and Anupam Sachdev are the