Cases

960 A.2d 360 (2008) 196 N.J. 544 Raymond Arthur ABBOTT, a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Frances Abbott; Arlene Figueroa, Frances Figueroa, Hector Figueroa, Orlando Figueroa and Vivian Figueroa, minors, by their Guardian Ad Litem, Blanca Figueroa; Michael Hadley, a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Lola Moore; Henry Stevens, Jr., a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Henry Stevens, Sr.; Caroline James and Jermaine James, minors, by

283 Md. 196 (1978) 388 A.2d 926 CLARENCE HARRIS JOHNSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND [No. 151, September Term, 1977.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided July 17, 1978. *197 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and ORTH, JJ. Victoria A. Salner, Assistant Public

Appellant filed a bill to quiet title in rem pursuant to Tit. 7, §§ 1116, 1132, Code of Alabama, 1940. The bill averred that appellant acquired fee-simple title to the land involved by virtue of a purchase from Lillian Sharpe Sellers, a widow, Cleveland M. Sellers and wife, William Walter Sellers, II and wife. The purchase was from the *Page 176 foregoing persons individually and as heirs of Anderson C. Sellers, deceased. All appellees were minors

110 S.E.2d 903 (1959) 251 N.C. 113 Arlene H. HARRISON v. Mattie F. WINSTEAD and Occidental Life Insurance Company. No. 237. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 4, 1959. Lamb, Lamb & Daughtridge, Wilson, for plaintiff. Battle, Winslow, Merrell, Scott & Wiley, Rocky Mount, Carr & Gibbons, Wilson, for defendant. D

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-11693 COMMONWEALTH vs. SHELDON MATTIS. Suffolk. February 6, 2

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

432 So.2d 704 (1983) Ruth BROWN, Appellant, v. Arthur L. BROWN, Appellee. No. 82-648. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 7, 1983. *705 Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Silverstein & Hellman, Miami, for appellant. Lawrence A. France, North Miami Beach, Scherman & Zelonker a

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

On March 11, 1913, James A. Hill, one of the defendants in error, in the district court of Garvin county, sued John and William Hill and Uda Polk, adults, and Harry and Susie Hill, minors, by their guardian, William Hill, and Ruth Hill, by her guardian, Mattie Hill. The object of the suit was to establish plaintiff's interest in the land described in the petition to be one-seventh, and for partition of the tract. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, which are: That prior to the

DISSENTING OPINION. I dissent from the opinion filed in this case for the following reasons: The defendant was prosecuted under the criminal laws of the State of Indiana by an affidavit filed in the court below, which omitting the caption, signature, verification and approval, reads as follows: "Ruth Glassburn swears he is informed and believes that Chester Gingerich and Mattie Gingerich, on or about the 12th day of November, 1947, at and in Jay County, State of Indiana, did the

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

679 F.Supp. 1204 (1987) Mattiebelle HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Defendant. Leonza LOFTIN, Plaintiff, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Defendant. Nos. 81-60-CIV-3, 80-168-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. December 28, 1987. *1205