Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Matthew Scott v. California Forensic Medical Group”
Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Professional Hospital Supply, Inc. (In Re Maxxim Medical Group, Inc.)public domain
434 B.R. 660 (2010) In re MAXXIM MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Maxxim Medical, Inc., Medline Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Professional Hospital Supply, Inc. and Karen McCauley, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-10438 (PJW). Adversary No. 8-03-mp-00026-MGW. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 31, 2010.
Samuel Fields v. Scott Jordanpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ SAMUEL FIELDS, │ Petitioner-Appellant
Randy Haight v. Scott Jordanpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0025p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RANDY HAIGHT, │ Petitioner-Appellant,
Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WALTER JOSEPH COOK III, No. 17-17257 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-06343- WHA SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
People v. Scottpublic domain
52 Cal.4th 452 (2011) 257 P.3d 703 129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 91 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID LYNN SCOTT III, Defendant and Appellant. No. S068863. Supreme Court of California. August 11, 2011. *458 Glen Niemy, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appel
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
State of Tennessee v. Matthew Kirk McWhorterpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 6, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MATTHEW KIRK MCWHORTER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Montgomery County No. 49900104 John H. Gasaway, Judge No. M2003-01132-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 30, 2004 A Montgomery County jury convicted the Defendant, Matthew Kirk McWhorter,
Klaczak v. Consolidated Medical Transportpublic domain
458 F.Supp.2d 622 (2006) John KLACZAK and Jeff Sharp, Individually and as ex rel. United States of America, Relators, v. CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL TRANSPORT, et al., Defendants. No. 96 C 6502. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 30, 2006. *625 Sidney R. Berger, Attorney at Law, Brian Richard Holman
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 11-0228 444444444444 BYRON D. NEELY, INDIVIDUALLY AND BYRON D. NEELY, M.D., P.A., PETITIONERS, v. NANCI WILSON, CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS, L.P., D/B/A KEYE-TV, AND VIACOM , INC., RESPONDENTS
People v. Morrisonpublic domain
CURREY, J. *983Near the end of his term of confinement, prison authorities identified Respondent Derrick Morrison as a potential sexually violent predator (SVP) pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act ( *736Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, et seq. ) (
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HARLAN V. FERGUSONpublic domain
05/28/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HARLAN V. FERGUSON, ALIAS HARLEY T. MARTIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108894 Bobby R. McGee, Judge 1
Du-All Safety, LLC v. Superior Courtpublic domain
Richman, J. *488Defendant Du-All Safety, LLC (Du-All) timely filed its expert witness disclosure pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure,1 identifying two experts it expected to call at trial. Plaintiffs' expert disclosure *489
People v. Morrisonpublic domain
Filed 4/30/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, B291804 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. ZM038715) v. DERRICK MORRISON, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an Order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Coun
People v. Collinspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRITTNEY COLLINS, Defendant and Appellant. S279737 Second Appellate District, Division Five B322744 Kern County Superior Court MF013183B January 6, 2025 J
Goetz v. Life Insurance Co. of North Americapublic domain
ORDER DENYING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERING JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR., United States District Judge On September 5, 2017, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 32 and 37. The Court denied both motions. The Court also heard oral argument on Ms. Goetz’s underlying benefits claim and took the matter un
Reeves v. Statepublic domain
KELLUM, Judge. Matthew Reeves appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked his capital-murder conviction and sentence of death. In 1998, Reeves was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, see § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. By a vote of 10-
People v. Petersonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SCOTT LEE PETERSON, Defendant and Appellant. S132449 San Mateo County Superior Court SC55500 August 24, 2020 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye an
People v. Pinedapublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SANTIAGO PINEDA, Defendant and Appellant. S150509 Los Angeles County Superior Court NA061271 June 27, 2022 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justi
State v. Smithpublic domain
2025 UT App 35 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. SHAWN MICHAEL SMITH, Appellant. Opinion No. 20220135-CA Filed March 6, 2025 Fifth District Court, Cedar City Department The Honorable Matthew L. Bell
State v. Stephen A. Zadrogapublic domain
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Stephen A. Zadroga (A-22-22) (087156) Argued April 25, 2023 -- Decided August 9, 2023 WAINER APTER, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers whether double jeopardy