Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Matthew Rosenthal v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.”
In re Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. The plaintiffs own an undisclosed number of shares of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (“Sauer-Danfoss” or the “Company”). They filed suit hours after Danfoss A/S, the Company’s controlling stockholder, announced a plan to launch a tender offer for the Sauer-Danfoss minority shares. After filing, the plaintiffs did not actually litigate. Instead, their counsel tried to set up
In Re Toys" R" US, Inc.public domain
877 A.2d 975 (2005) In re TOYS "R" US, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. Cons. C.A. No. 1212-N. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Date Submitted: June 17, 2005. Date Decided: June 22, 2005. Date Corrected: June 24, 2005. *978 Andre G. Bouchard, Esquire, and Joel Friedlander, Esquire, Bouchard Margules & Frie
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.public domain
207 B.R. 764 (1997) In re The LESLIE FAY COMPANIES, INC., et al., Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 93 B 41724 (TLB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. April 15, 1997. As Corrected April 21, 1997. *765 *766 Weil Gotshal & Manges, L.L.P. by Alan B. Miller, Brian S. Rosen, Frank
In Re IBP, Inc., Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
789 A.2d 14 (2001) In re IBP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. IBP, Inc., Defendant and Cross-Claim Plaintiff, and Counterclaim Defendant, v. Tyson Foods, Inc. and Lasso Acquisition Corporation, Defendants, Cross-Claim Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs. Civil Action No. 18373. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: June 3, 2001. Deci
Lawlor v. Gallagher Presidents' Report, Inc.public domain
394 F.Supp. 721 (1975) Matthew J. LAWLOR, Plaintiff, v. The GALLAGHER PRESIDENTS' REPORT, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 73 Civ. 5443-LFM. United States District Court, S. D. New York. May 13, 1975. *722 *723 *724 Richard Ives Rudell and Davis J. Stolzar, Ne
Stryker Employment Company, LL v. Jafar Abbaspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0031p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ STRYKER EMPLOYMENT COMPANY, LLC, a Michigan │ limited liability comp
Swords v. Comm'rpublic domain
Marvel, Judge: These consolidated cases concern separate notices of liability that respondent issued to the cotrustees of the Julia R. Swords Trust (Swords Trust), the David P. Reynolds Trust (Reynolds Trust), the Margaret R. Mackell Trust (Mackell Trust), and the Dorothy R. Brotherton Trust (Brotherton Trust) (collectively, petitioner trusts).2 Respondent determined in the no
142 T.C. No. 19 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JULIA R. SWORDS TRUST, TRANSFEREE, MARGARET R. MACKELL, DOROTHY R. BROTHERTON, AND JULIA R. SWORDS, CO-TRUSTEES, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 10882-10, 10883-10, Filed May 29, 2014. 10884-10, 10885-10. R issued notices of transferee liability to Ps to colle
651 F.Supp.2d 596 (2009) SOUTHGATE MASTER FUND, LLC, by and through MONTGOMERY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, its Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-2335-K. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 18, 2009. *598 M. Todd Welty, Claire Irene Wade, Sonne
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United Statespublic domain
425 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2006) CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE; Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc.; Canadian Wheat Board; Ontario Forest Indus. Ass'n; Ontario Lumber Mfgs Ass'n; the Free Trade Lumber Council; and the Government of Canada, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America; Deborah J. Spero, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs & Border Protection; and United States Customs & Border Protection, Defendants, and Coalition for Fair Lumber
In re MFW Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacA
747 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY the TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fidelity High Tech Advisor a Fund, LLC, by the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 05-40151-FDS, 06-40130-FDS, 06-40243-FDS, 06-40244-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: In this most unusual Texas lender liability diversity action, the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association appeals a jury verdict for plaintiffs, as well as the district court’s (1) award of attorney’s fees to plaintiffs and (2) judgment against the Bank on its counterclaims. And, the plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of prejudgment interest and the amount of the fees. We
939 F.2d 1176 16 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 681 RICHTER, S.A., Investments U.S.A.-Richter Corporation,Richardson B. Gill, Sharon Gill and Gill Wine &Grape Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees,Cross-Appellants,v.BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION,Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.TESORO SAVINGS & LOAN, Plaintiff,Richardson B. Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants
317 Md. 72 (1989) 562 A.2d 720 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY. YALE LUBMAN ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY. Nos. 95, 104, September Term, 1987. Court of Appeals of Maryland. September 1, 1989. George A. Nilson (Lee
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this proposed massive class action, thirteen plaintiffs claim that forty-two defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers fraudulently and grossly inflate the prices to consumers of many drugs by misstating the “Average Wholesale Prices” (“AWPs”) of their drugs in industry publications. T
OPINION BROWN, Chief Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction..............................................................317 II. Factual Background .......................................................317 III. Procedural History........................................................318 A. Pre-Certification History.
494 F.Supp. 1190 (1980) ZENITH RADIO CORPORATION v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. et al. NATIONAL UNION ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. et al. In re JAPANESE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civ. A. Nos. 74-2451, 74-3247. MDL No. 189. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 14, 1980. <