Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Matthew R. Boller”
Boller v. Tip Top Trim Shoppublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Employer-Below, Appellee. MATTHEW E. BOLLER, ) ) Claimant-Below, ) Appellant, ) C.A. No. K17A-09-002 WLW ) In and for Kent County v. ) ) TIP TOP TRIM SHOP, ) ) ) ) Subrnitted: March 12, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018 ORDER Upon Appeal from the Decision of the Industrial Accident Board. Remana'ed Walter F. Schmittinger, Esquire and Candace E. Holmes, Esquire of Schmittinger and Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, Delaware, attorneys for Claimant-Appellant.
STITT, JOSE J., PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 599 KA 14-00470 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSE J. STITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTO
DANIEL KELLY, J. *592 *727 ¶1 This case addresses whether a circuit court order denying a request to compel arbitration and stay a pending lawsuit is final for the purposes of appeal. We hold th
R.S. v. Milwaukee Countypublic domain
MOSER, P.J. (dissenting). The trial court and the majority misread the plain language of sec. 880.33(2)(a)l., Stats., which states in part: "The proposed ward, attorney or guardian ad litem shall have the right to present and cross-examine witnesses, including the physician or psychologist reporting to the court under sub. (1)." (Emphasis added.) Also, the majority incorrectly qualified a person who is a court l
United States v. Matthewspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT KUCERA, Judge: The appellant was convicted by a special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of wrongful possession of marihuana and, by substitutions and exceptions, of simple assault (two specifications) in violation of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 934 (1976). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. v. Estate of Pittspublic domain
HINES, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because contrary to the opinion of the majority, the analysis of the Court of Appeals is neither ill-reasoned nor incomplete. That Court’s reversal of the trial court’s grants of summary judgment to defendants — the City of Atlanta and companies associated with a construction project at the Atlanta Hartsfield-J ackson International Airport — on breach of contrac
Hay Group Management Inc v. Bernd Schneiderpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-1473 ________________ HAY GROUP MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellant v. BERND SCHNEIDER ________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Penn
Hay Grp. Mgmt., Inc. v. Schneiderpublic domain
Bartle, J. Plaintiff Hay Group Management, Inc. ("Hay Management") has sued Defendant Bernd Schneider for breach of fiduciary and legal duty and civil conspiracy.1 The allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, *666filed on June 7, 2016, arise out of Schneider's conduct prior to his purported termination in 2003
Shock v. Kettmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1944 Filed March 19, 2025 BRIAN R. SHOCK, Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. MATTHEW J. KETTMAN, M.D. and FIAT FAMILY MEDICINE, P.L.L.C., an Iowa Limited Liability Company, f/k/a KETTMAN PRANGER FAMILY MEDICINE, P.L.L.C., also f/k/a KETTMAN FAMILY PRACTICE, P.L.L.C., a/k/a KPFM, P.L.L.C., each an Iowa Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees/Cro
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1019-22 ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF NEW JERSEY, ANGELA METLER, and DOREEN FREGA, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION November 6, 2023 Appellants,
271 B.R. 821 (2001) In re DeMERT & DOUGHERTY, INC., Debtor. Karen R. Goodman, as Trustee of DeMert & Dougherty, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Phoenix Container, Inc., Joel Schonfeld, Schonfeld & Weinstein, LLP, Kenneth Sokoloff, Thomas Bartkovich and Hollow Brook Holdings, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 98 B 38160. Adversary No. 00 A 1117. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern D
Smith v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitalpublic domain
424 Pa. Superior Ct. 41 (1993) 621 A.2d 1030 Kathy SMITH, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Charles L. Smith, on Behalf of the Estate, Its Survivors and Dependents, and In Her Own Right, Appellant, v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, Peter Schneider, M.D., Helena Boller-Watts, M.D., Eric L. Hume, M.D., Douglas Hutchinson, M.D., Lisa Rescigno, Dominic Buonfiglio, Harpers Bar, Corba's Saloon and William J.
Clayton v. City of Kingstonpublic domain
44 F.Supp.2d 177 (1999) Taisha CLAYTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KINGSTON; City of Kingston Police Department; Detective Matthews of the Kingston Police Department; and "John Doe," "Richard Doe," and others of the Kingston Police Department, Defendants. No. 97-CV-1563. United States District Court, N.D. New York. April 23, 1999. *178
Libertarian Party of Erie County v. Cuomopublic domain
18-386 Libertarian Party of Erie County v. Cuomo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ------ August Term, 2018 (Argued: February 20, 2019 Decided: August 11, 2020) Docket No. 18-386 ____________________________________________________________ LIBERTARIAN PAR
Libertarian Party of Erie Cnty. v. Cuomopublic domain
HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge *430INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint alleging that New York State's firearms licensing laws are unconstitutional. See ECF No. 1. After several Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on December 23, 2015. ECF Nos.
Weems v. Federated Mutual Insurancepublic domain
220 F.Supp.2d 979 (2002) Marcus David WEEMS, Plaintiff, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A/K/A Federated Life Insurance Company, A/K/A Federated Insurance Company, Jeff Daley, and Del Hirsch, Defendants. No. C00-2013 MJM. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. March 20, 2002. *980
United States v. Aumanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FOREMAN, Judge: The appellant was charged with larceny of $290.00 from a fellow soldier. He at*642tempted to plead guilty to wrongful appropriation but his plea was rejected by the military judge. The appellant was convicted of the larceny and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, parti
Atlantic Cape May Package Store Ass'n v. Statepublic domain
RIMM, J. T. C. This matter involves an attack on the constitutionality of the Alcoholic Beverage Wholesale Sales Tax Act, N.J.S.A. 54:32C-1 et. seq., and the Atlantic City luxury tax. It is before the court on the separate motions of each defendant to dismiss the complaint, and the cross-motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are, respectively, a nonprofit corporation compris
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: The consolidated cases before the Court require us to interpret the effect of the permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546 (1996), on the jurisdiction of federal courts to hear challenges raised by criminal aliens with respect to removal proceedings commenced by the Immigration and Naturalization S
United States v. Hightowerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT CARNE, Senior Judge: Appellant, a U. S. Army recruiter, was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of effecting unlawful enlistments, in violation of Article 84, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 884, and one specification of failure to obey the enlistment regulation, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892. At his trial before a special co