Cases

COHEN, J. Phillip Martin Baker timely appeals from the order denying his rule 3.850 motion. We agree with Baker that the motion is not procedurally barred and reverse. In 2010, Baker was charged with felony driving under the influence (“DUI”) for a third DUI violation within ten years after a prior DUI conviction. See § 316.193(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). Baker entered a plea of nolo contendere

Barnes, Judge. Division 7 of the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case has been affirmed in part and reversed in part by the Supreme Court, Baker v. Brannen/Goddard Co., 274 Ga. 745, 750 (2) (559 SE2d 450) (2002), as follows: [T]he judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed to the extent that it allows B/G and Rich to recover for any unpaid monthly commissions due before Septem

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Eighteen citizens (the citizens) of Greenwood, Missouri (the City), sued Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., Hunt Martin Materials, LLC, and several trucking companies (collectively, “the quarry defendants”) in Missouri state court, asserting various state-law tort claims. The quarry defendants removed the case to federal district court, whereupon the district court issued an injunction prohibiting the cit

42 So.3d 474 (2010) BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C. and William N. Reed v. Sam SEAY William N. Reed and Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. v. Sam Seay. Nos. 2008-IA-00768-SCT, 2008-IA-00999-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 10, 2010. Rehearing Denied September 16, 2010.

Sears, Presiding Justice, concurring. I agree with the majority that the Court of Appeals’ consideration of the transcript from the Nolan action when deciding the present appeal was not harmful, as it did not result in the consideration of any evidence not already included in the record in this appeal. However, I believe that the Court of Appeals clearly erred by considering matters outside th

709 F.Supp.2d 1084 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, ex. rel. Robert C. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., Eastern New Mexico Medical Center; Mimbres Memorial Hospital; Northeastern Regional Hospital; and Helena Regional Medical Center, Defendants. Civil No. 05-279 WJ/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 19, 2010.

08/02/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 1, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES PHILLIP RICKMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County No. 20-CR-10717 Tony A. Childress, Chancellor ___________________________________

04/30/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 27, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PHILLIP JEROME LOCKE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 112273 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

127 F.3d 1081 75 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 565 James R. BAKER, Charles W. Baker, Jr., Jeffery L. Beran,William M. Blaesing, Paul Bolen, Robert W. Bowen Iii,Charles Brown, Jr., Ronald Bryant, Fred W. Budinger,Frederick W. Butler, Kenneth D. Clonts, Michael J. Connors,Daniel J. Coonan Iii, Robert S. Cope, Wayne D. Corder,Charles Cushion, Dale A. Davidson, Oak Deberg, Jesse C.Dehay, Jr., John C. Dun

FILED Aug 11, 2023 02:00 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges. CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. This is a military backpay case that is brought by 83 retired United States Air Force colonels. These colonels challenge their selection for retirement by a Selective Early Retirement Board (SERB) in January 1992. The basis of their complaint is that the charge given to the SERB, on its face and as applied by the

Affirm and Opinion Filed August 20, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00488-CV MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT, Appellant V. MATTHEW ZUCKER, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

320 Ga. 156 FINAL COPY S24A0560. BAKER v. THE STATE. S24A0582. LAGUERRE v. THE STATE. PINSON, Justice. Prentice Baker and Verlaine Laguerre were convicted of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a fel- ony for the shooting death of Matthew Hardeman. The evidence at trial showed that on the day of the shooting, Hardeman and La- guerre got into a fistfight in front of the home of Andrew “Cali” Ellis, a mutual frie

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Mar 27 2019, 10:55 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

HARRELL, J. It seems that speed cameras are a particularly unpopular law enforcement tool, having provoked some Marylanders to vandalism. See Erin Cox, Speed Cameras v. Vandals, Balt. Sun, 28 June 2012, at Al. Angry drivers are reported to have set fire to, hurled rocks at, and slingshot marbles at the cameras. In perhaps the most extreme example of retribution, we are informed that a man approached a car-m

30 A.3d 267 (2011) 201 Md. App. 642 Matthew C. BAKER, et al. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, et al. No. 1038, September Term, 2010. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 27, 2011. *269 Stephen H. Ring, Gaithersburg, MD (William F. Askinazi, Germantown, MD and Toby N. Byrd, Timothy P. Leahy, Joshua

HUSKEY, Judge Jeffery Alan Baker appeals from the judgment of conviction for first degree murder of his eleven-week-old daughter, G.B. Baker raises the following issues on appeal: (1) the district court erred in failing to provide the jury with a unanimity instruction; (2) the *293 district comí; er

OPINION MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice. This appeal asks whether an individual who signs a contract on behalf of a Delaware corporation that has forfeited its corporate charter concedes personal jurisdiction in Texas under the contract’s forum selection clause. Baker Hughes Inc. sued Robert E. Brooks on a promissory note that he signed as president of Delphi Consulting, Inc. The trial court granted Brooks’s

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Sep 16 2016, 7:54 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals court except for the purpose of establi

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 117 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CR-20-314 2023.06.22 15:07:56 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: March 10, 2021 RODNEY L. BAKER