⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Matthew Millard”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-12-15 · Published · cited 1× · 404 F. App'x 804
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: SunTrust appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Debtors’ Motion to Avoid Lien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SunTrust B
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-08-12 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F.3d 738; 2003 WL 21910711
LOKEN, Chief Judge. We have consolidated these appeals in two diversity actions brought to establish the parties’ respective liabilities for a January 1998 fire that destroyed the Signature Foods processing business of SFH, Inc. (“Signature”). The fire started in the portion of an Omaha warehouse that Signature leased from Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc. (“Millard”). Millard m
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009-03-12 · Published · cited 4× · 967 A.2d 155; 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 138; 2009 WL 612492
967 A.2d 155 (2009) Kenneth MILLARD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 06-CF-905. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 16, 2008. Decided March 12, 2009. *156 Jonathan Anderson, Public Defender Service, with whom Joshua Deahl, James Klein and Samia Fam, Public Defender Service, were on th
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983-09-09 · Published · cited 8× · 307 S.E.2d 739; 167 Ga. App. 855; 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2640
Deen, Presiding Judge. Appellee, Plant Improvement Company, Inc., commenced this action against the appellant, Millard Matthews Builders, Inc., and two subcontractors, seeking to recover damages allegedly resulting from the defendants’ negligent design and construction of a building. It is undisputed that construction of the appellee’s commercial building was completed by the appellant in 1974, and that on August 31, 1979, a p
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966-05-06 · Published · cited 15× · 25 A.D.2d 341; 269 N.Y.S.2d 588; 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327
Herlihy, J. The appellant instituted this proceeding seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not obligated to provide Coverage for its insured on the ground that it was not given timely notice of the accident or of subsequent legal proceedings. The court found the testimony of Miss Combs, an insurance broker, credible. The general rule is that the credibility of witnesses is for the trier of the facts and
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered September 25, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00278-CV JULIE E. SCHMADER, Appellant V. MATTHEW M. BUTSCHEK D/B/A ACCENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 246 La. 863; 167 So. 2d 675; 1964 La. LEXIS 2754
In re: Millard E. Matthew et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 165So.2d850. Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964-06-01 · Published · cited 3× · 165 So. 2d 850; 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1807
SAMUEL, Judge. This is a suit by which plaintiff seeks: (1) to be decreed the sole owner of certain immovable property in Hessmer Farms Subdivision in the Parish of Jefferson, and (2) an accounting from the defendants. The two defendants, Millard E. Matthew and Metairie Realty, Inc., respectively a real estate agent and a corporation of which Matthew was president, answered and re*
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963-10-14 · Published · cited 0× · 156 So. 2d 607; 245 La. 74; 1963 La. LEXIS 2607
In re: J. Albert Ellermann applying for writs of certiorari and prohibition. Writs refused. The ruling complained! of is correct.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011-04-25 · Published · cited 28× · 639 F.3d 857; 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 598; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8449; 2011 WL 1532090
639 F.3d 857 (2011) Albert David MATTHEW, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2514. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 17, 2011. Filed: April 25, 2011. *859 Terrance J. Wagener, argued, Molly R. Hamilton, on the brief, M
United States Court of Claims · 1989-03-13 · Published · cited 1× · 16 Cl. Ct. 485; 1989 U.S. Claims LEXIS 34; 1989 WL 21560
OPINION WIESE, Judge. The plaintiff in this case is a retired member of the United States Army whose military pay, commencing in September of 1984 (when he was still on active duty), became subject to a California wage assignment order (a garnishment order) for child and spousal support. In accordance with this order, the Army has been paying part of his monthly salary (now his retirement annuity) to his
Millard v. Matthewspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 149 F.2d 292; 80 U.S. App. D.C. 123; 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2585
PER CURIAM. -This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining the will of a very eccentric elderly woman. The court properly submitted to the jury the question whether the testatrix had “sufficient mind and memory to know: (1) What property she owns in a general way; (2) the person or persons who would be the natural objects of her bounty and her relation towards them; (3) the business in which she was engaged when executing her
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 162 F. Supp. 3d 746; 2016 WL 537966
MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is denied. BACKGROUND Defendants John Alban (Alban), Mark Metzger (Metzger), Darryl Cook (Cook), and Scott Wiatrek (Wiatrek) were allegedly shareholders in Renaissance Industries, Inc. (Renaissa
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-10-07 · Published · cited 4× · 339 F.3d 738
339 F.3d 738 SFH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.MILLARD REFRIGERATED SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,Larsen Realty Company, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-2330. No. 02-2489. No. 02-3442.
District Court, D. Oregon · 2018-02-08 · Published · cited 0× · 286 F. Supp. 3d 1160
BROWN, Senior Judge. *1162This case comes before the Court on Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company's Motion (# 25) for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Uptown Market, LLC's Motion (# 27) for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant's Affirmative Defenses. For the reasons
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990-11-26 · Published · cited 33× · 916 F.2d 1
NIES, Chief Judge. Arthur Frank Millard, now a retired member of the United States Army, appeals from the judgment of the United States Claims Court, Millard v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 485 (1989) (Wiese, J.), granting summary judgment in favor of the government on Millard’s claim under the Back Pay Act 1
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 765 F. Supp. 2d 1208; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18743; 2011 WL 658559
765 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2011) Alexander M. HILL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Rawlings Mechanical Corp., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 10-02603 SJO (CWx). United States District Court, C.D. California. February 10, 2011. *1209 Alexander M. Hill, Agua Dulce, CA, pro se. Daniel F. Fears
People v. Millardpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1884-03-06 · Published · cited 3× · 53 Mich. 63; 1884 Mich. LEXIS 639; 18 N.W. 562
Campbell, J. Respondent was convicted in Ionia county of the murder of his wife by poison, on May 9, 1882. The information sets out that the death was caused by a series of acts of administering arsenic with her medicine, beginning April 25, 1882, and continuing till her death. The body was taken up by the coroner on the 22d day of August thereafter, when a partial examination was had by local physicians, and the stomach and part
In Re Perrypublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010-02-24 · Published · cited 7× · 425 B.R. 323; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1573; 2010 WL 668040
425 B.R. 323 (2010) In re Will Clay PERRY, Debtor. No. 08-32362-H4-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 24, 2010. *335 John Richard Millard, Law Office of John Millard, PC, John Wesley Wauson, Matthew Brian Probus, Wauson Probus, Sugar Land, TX, Ray J. Black, Jr., Law Offices of Ray J. Black, Jr., Ho
Tarbell v. Millardpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1886-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 63 Mich. 250; 29 N.W. 722; 1886 Mich. LEXIS 657
Sherwood, J. Previous to September 1, 1882, Matthew Millard had been engaged in mercantile and other business at Palo, Michigan, about thirteen years. He was then the owner of real estate and personal property; had been obliged to hire money to carry on his business, and procure securities on his paper when he obtained his loans. His father, Leander Millard, and an uncle by the name of Baltis Titsworth, usually signed for him whe