Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 6, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MATTHEW KIRK MCWHORTER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Montgomery County No. 49900104 John H. Gasaway, Judge No. M2003-01132-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 30, 2004 A Montgomery County jury convicted the Defendant, Matthew Kirk McWhorter,

SUPERIOR COURT KIRK ALLEN[1] vs. MATTHEW CHRISTENSEN & Others[1] Docket: 2284CV02756-BLS2 Dates: January, 2025 Present:

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00388-CV Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith, Appellants v. Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-20-00388-CV Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith, Appellants v. Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts, Appellees

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 6, 2021 No. 04-20-00388-CV Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith, Appellants v. Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 28, 2021 No. 04-20-00388-CV Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith, Appellants v. Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts, Appe

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 12, 2020 No. 04-20-00388-CV Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith, Appellants v. Dana G. KIRK, Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts, Appelle

Keller, P.J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. Alcala, J., filed a concurring opinion. In a prior decision, we suggested that there was a time limit on the trial court’s power to rescind the granting of a new trial. We now conclude that there is no specific time limit on the trial court’s power to do so.1 Consequently, we reverse the judgmen

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. bin this criminal case, the defendant, Keith Kirk, appeals his conviction on one count of second degree murder, in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1, and the life sentence imposed on him. Mr. Kirk alleges two assignments of error: 1) that the trial court erred in denying his challenges for cause as to six prospective jurors, and 2) that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Kirk did no

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Kirk D. Vester appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment as to his excessive-force claim against Deputy Sheriff Daniel Hallock. Vester argues that Hallock’s use of an “arm bar technique” was objectively unreasonable and that he is therefore not entitled to qualified immunity. Havi

J. JONES, Justice. This ease involves a dispute between two creditors as to whose claim against their debtor’s property has priority. The respondents, Alan and Marilyn Golub (Golubs), recorded a judgment in the amount of $941,000 against their judgment debtor, Kirk-Hughes Development, LLC (KHD), giving Golubs a judgment lien on property owned by KHD in Kootenai County. KHD now

145 P.3d 512 (2006) Kenneth KIRK, Appellant, v. Laverna DEMIENTIEFF and United Companies, Appellees. No. S-11760. Supreme Court of Alaska. October 6, 2006. *513 Michael C. Geraghty, Delisio Moran Geraghty & Zobel, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellant. Laura L. Farley and Michelle M. Meshke, Farley & Graves, P.C., Anchora

CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Jesse William Kirk (Kirk) was convicted by a jury of one count of burglary (§45-6-204(1), MCA) and one count of criminal possession of dangerous drugs (§ 45-9-102(4), MCA). He was sentenced as a persistent felony offender on the burglary conviction, receiv

2/15/2019 8:10:13 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–1229 Filed February 15, 2019 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. MATTHEW L. NOEL, Respondent. On review of the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. The grievance commission recommends we suspend an attorney’s license for an inde

*********** This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dollar, along with the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding and enters the following Opinion and Award.

29 P.3d 255 (2001) David and Mary GLAMANN, individually and as next friend of Jesse Glamann, Appellants, v. Gloria KIRK (f/k/a Gloria Caler), Appellee. No. S-9362. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 17, 2001. *257 Brett Von Gemmingen, Anchorage, for Appellants. Paul W. Waggoner, Law Offices of Paul W. Waggoner, Anchorage, for

183 Cal.App.4th 776 (2010) PATRICK KIRK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B218956. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. April 7, 2010. *784 Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad, Lisa Perrochet; Haight Brown & Boneste

942 S.W.2d 624 (1997) Marvin Leroy KIRK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 1553-96, 1554-96. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. January 29, 1997. Opinion Ordered Published March 17, 1997. *625 Kerry P. Fitzgerald, Dallas, for appellant. John Vance, District Attorney, Dallas, Matthe

Filed 2/10/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN CHARLOTTE KIRK et al., B309880 Plaintiffs and (Los Angeles County Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP02842) v. BRETT RATNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Co

Filed 2/23/22 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN CHARLOTTE KIRK et al., B309880 Plaintiffs and (Los Angeles County Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP02842) v. ORDER MODIFYING