⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Matthew John Murphy and Caroline Marie Skelton”

State of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Facilities Commission, for and on Behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; The Texas Facilities Commission; Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Facilities Commission; The Texas Health and Human Services Commission; And Rolland Niles in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. 8317 Cross Park, LLCpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
State of Texas, the Texas Facilities Commission, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the TFC, and Rolland Niles, in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Broadmoor Austin Associates, a Texas Joint Venturepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
State of Arizona v. Raytheon Companypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-08-01 · Published · cited 44× · 761 F.3d 1005; 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20182; 2014 WL 3765569; 79 ERC (BNA) 1463; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14993
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF ARIZONA, No. 12-15691 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:10-cv-00634- CKJ CITY OF TUCSON, Intervenor-Plaintiff–Appellee, OPINION v. ASHTON COMPANY INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Raytheon Company → · find the judge →
State of Arizona v. Raytheon Companypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF ARIZONA, No. 12-15691 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:10-cv-00634- CKJ CITY OF TUCSON, Intervenor-Plaintiff–Appellee, OPINION v. ASHTON COMPANY INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Raytheon Company → · find the judge →
In Re Enron Corp. Securitiespublic domain
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008-09-08 · Published · cited 66× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 732; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84708
586 F.Supp.2d 732 (2008) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446. Civ.A. No. H-01-3624. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 8, 2008. *735 Richard J. Zook, Cunningham Darlow e
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →