Cases

PER CURIAM. We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the charges against Daniel George Hoffman based on the constitutionality of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2011). See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). Reversed and remanded. NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-1032 Filed October 28, 2015 TERESA CHRISTINE PAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. GREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEMS, GREAT RIVER MEDICAL CENTER, GREAT RIVER BUSINESS HEALTH, DR. JAMES MILANI, DR. RICK GARRELS, and DR. MATTHEW J. HOFFMAN, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Mo

¶1 This case involves five questions of law related to Washington Initiative Measure No. 297 (1-297),1 now known as the Cleanup Priority Act (CPA), chapter 70.105E RCW. These questions were certified to this court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Owens, J. FACTS ¶2 The CPA was passed as 1-297 in the November 2004 electi

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: James Lee Henderson appeals the district court’s denial of federal habeas relief on his claim that he is ineligible to be executed because he is intellectually disabled. We AFFIRM. I. Although this is not Henderson’s first appeal to this Court, we set out the facts and lengthy procedural history bef

*727 DE MUNIZ, J. In these two criminal cases consolidated for purposes of opinion, each defendant’s conviction was based, for the most part, on eyewitness identification evidence. In State v. Lawson, 239 Or App 363, 244 P3d 860 (2010), t

AMENDED * MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER ROBERT D. POTTER, Senior District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed December 6,1993, praying for a Declaratory Judgment, a temporary restraining order, and a preliminary injunction (document # 1). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Plai

232 Wis.2d 53 (1999) 2000 WI App 22 606 N.W.2d 590 Cynthia HOFFMAN, Daniel Hoffman and Shawn, Troy and Cory Hoffman, minors by Attorney Greg Krug, Their Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiffs, FIRST AUTO & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Family Health Center, Involuntary-Plaintiffs, v. ECONOMY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, Danielle Metz and James B. Metz, Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

845 F.Supp. 340 (1994) Sharon HOFFMAN, Trudie Matthews, Diane Hoefling, Rev. Ronnie Wallace, and Rev. John Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. James B. HUNT, The State of North Carolina, D.R. Stone, and The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Defendants. No. 3:93-CV-393-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. February 22, 1994.

OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: We are convened to review a decision of the district court holding two statutes — one enacted by the General Assembly of North Carolina and the other enacted by the Congress of the United States — to be unconstitutional. See Hoffman v. Hunt, 923 F.Supp. 791 (W.D.N.C.1996). The district court held that a North Carolina law criminalizing the obstruction of access to

938 A.2d 474 (2007) JAMES CORPORATION d/b/a/ James Construction v. NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Thomas & Williamson, LLC, D & L, Inc., Foreman Architects Engineers, Inc., and Chambers Vukich Associates, P.C. Appeal of North Allegheny School District. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 9, 2007. Decided November 30, 2007. Reargumen

Case: 20-30323 Document: 00516780349 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 9, 2023

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0318 MORGAN BANKS, et al., APPELLANTS, V. DAVID H. HOFFMAN, et

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This commercial leasehold case presents a ripeness question. Appellant Venator Group Speciality, Inc. (Venator) initiated this declaratory judgement action against Appellee Matthew /Muniot Family seeking *837 an order declaring Venator’s legal obligations pursuant to a comm

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: The action in this case was filed under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 26, the antitrust laws of foreign nations, and international law, on behalf of all fore

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201400067 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MATTHEW P. HOFFMANN Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: We withdraw the prior panel opinion and substitute the following: With its colorful history and rich cultural stew, Louisiana has long been a popular setting for works of fiction, including movies. In recent years the state has also tried to become a place where films are made. That effort enjoyed considerable success. The Cu

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATTHEW SCIABACUCCHI and HIALEAH EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiffs, v. LIBERTY BROADBAND CORPORATION, JOHN MALONE, GREGORY MAFFEI, MICHAEL C.A. No. 11418-VCG HUSEBY, BALAN NAIR, ERIC ZINTERHOFER, CRAIG JACOBSON, THOMAS RUTLEDGE, DAVID MERRITT, LANCE CONN, and JOHN MARKLEY, Defendants, and CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Nominal Defendant.

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 8, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00701-CV THOMAS G. ANDRUS, WHITE MARTIN ENERGY SERVICES, INC., GUY E. MATTHEWS, AND BLACK ELK ENERGY, INC., Appellants V. BLACK ELK ENERGY OFFSHORE OPERATIONS, L.L.C., BLACK ELK ENERGY, L.L.C., JOHN G. HOFFMAN, JAMES HAGEMEIER, PPVA BLACK ELK (EQUITY) L.L

January 8, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals THOMAS G. ANDRUS, WHITE MARTIN ENERGY SERVICES, INC., GUY E. MATTHEWS, AND BLACK ELK ENERGY, INC., Appellants NO. 14-12-00701-CV V. BLACK ELK ENERGY OFFSHORE OPERATIONS, L.L.C., BLACK ELK ENERGY, L.L.C., JOHN G. HOFFMAN, JAMES HAGEMEIER, PPVA BLACK ELK (EQUITY) L.L.C., PPVA BLACK ELK (I

Case: 16-30104 Document: 00514619324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2018 REVISED August 28, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-30104 August 24, 2018