Cases

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

Opinion issued March 7, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERMNANN AND

Opinion issued March 10, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00035-COA CURTIS DEAN LOFTON SR. APPELLANT v. SHARON RENAE LOFTON AND PENTAGON APPELLEES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/04/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAYE A. BRADLEY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LINCOLN COUNTY CHANCERY

207 P.3d 631 (2008) MAYER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Gadsen Elementary School District, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark WINKLEMAN, in his capacity as State Land Commissioner; The Arizona State Land Department; The State of Arizona; Apache County; Cochise County; Coconino County; Graham County; Greenlee County; Maricopa County; Mohave County; Navajo County; Pima County; Pinal County; Santa Cruz County; Yavapai County; Yuma County; Maricopa County

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT Dolores Frederick, Patricia Hagaman, and Beverly Taylor (collectively, Objectors) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (trial court) that affirmed the decision of the Allegheny Township Zoning Hearing Board (Zoning Board) to deny Objectors' land use appeal. In that appeal, Objectors raised a substantive validity challen

MEMORANDUM RULING ROY S. PAYNE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Currently before'the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 159) filed by Defendant Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation on April 15, 2011. The Motion comes back before the Court to consider the effect of the August 27, 2013 decision of the Court of Appeals (the Agerton decision) reversing the Judgment rendered in favor of some of the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. The real estate at issue in this proposed class action is part of an 800-acre development along the mid-Gulf Coast of Texas. But the allegations of fraud reach back to decisions made in Washington and Wall Street during the height of the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. In the spasm of bank merger activity that occurred during that period, whe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VALLE DEL SOL INCORPORATED; No. 12-17152 COALICION DE DERECHOS HUMANOS; UNITED FOOD AND D.C. No. COMMERCIAL WORKERS 2:10-cv-01061- INTERNATIONAL UNION; BORDER SRB ACTION NETWORK; JIM SHEE; UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Jane Doe #3 in Amended Complaint; OPINION JOHN DOE #1, proceeding under pseudonym; LUZ SANTIAGO; ARIZONA SOUTH ASI

2019 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP1517 COMPLETE TITLE: Terrie Myers and Philip Myers, Petitioners-Appellants-Cross- Respondents-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Respond

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-1826 & 20-1830 THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. R.W. DUNTEMAN COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States Di

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. This case addresses the question of the proper remedy when there is a violation of the False Claims Act (FCA) requirement that certain complaints must be sealed for a limited time period. See 31 U.S.C. § 3730

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 12911642 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

751 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2010) Sheila I. HOFSTETTER, individually, as a representative of the class, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. No. C 10-01313 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 29, 2010. *1118

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2008 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO MAYER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ) and GADSEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ) DISTRICT, ) ) Pla

OPINION BASKIR, Judge. This ease presents an inverse condemnation claim under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs base their claims on the Government’s failure to adequately design, build, or maintain certain levees in New Orleans before and after Hurricane Katrina, resulting in a permanent loss of value to their properties. The Plaintiffs cite the failure of the l

988 A.2d 209 (2010) 294 Conn. 785 TOWN OF BRANFORD v. Thomas SANTA BARBARA, Jr., et al. New England Estates, LLC v. Town of Branford. Nos. 18089, 18091. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 26, 2009. Decided February 16, 2010. *211 Wesley W. Horton, Hartford, with whom were

(2008) Jose PARDO-KRONEMANN, Plaintiff, v. Alphonso JACKSON, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-626 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff Jose Pardo-Kronemann, an employee in the Office of Internation

223 Wis.2d 99 (1998) 588 N.W.2d 662 STATE EX REL. Gregory SPINNER and Marianne Giannis, Husband and Wife, and Mark Kennedy and Sarah Green, Husband and Wife, Petitioners-Appellants, v. KENOSHA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Including Individuals, Sheila M. Siegler, George Wundsam, Vernon Woltersdorf, William Glembocki, John Todd and Emily Uhlenhake, Respondents-Respondents, George WRONOWSKI, Intervening-Respondent.</