Cases

PER CURIAM: Curtis Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v. Sizer, No. l:06-cv-03078-WDQ (D.Md. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2097 Doc: 64 Filed: 07/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2097 LULA WILLIAMS; GLORIA TURNAGE; GEORGE HENGLE; DOWIN COFFY; MARCELLA P. SINGH, Administrator of the Estate of Felix M. Gillison, Jr., on behalf of themselves and

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GLACIER BEAR RETREAT, LLC; No. 23-35117 GAIL L. GOODWIN; DARRYL C. SLATTENGREN, D.C. No. 9:22-cv- 00019-KLD Plaintiffs-counter- defendants-Appellees, v. ORDER CERTIFYING MATT DUSEK; RACHEL DUSEK, QUESTION TO THE SUPREME

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0291p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH, │ Petitioner-Appe

Rehearing en banc granted, August 22, 2007 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI,  Petitioner-Appellant, and MARK A. BERMAN, as next friend, Petitioner, v. COMMANDER S. L. WRIGHT, USN Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, Respondent-Appellee. SPECIALISTS IN THE LAW OF WAR; PROFESSORS O

199 P.3d 244 (2008) 2008 MT 444 347 Mont. 530 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. William John MATT, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 06-0134. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs June 6, 2007. Decided December 30, 2008. *246 For Appellant: Chad Wri

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2020-Ohio-5577.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2020-A-0022 - vs - : HANDY VERNARD WRIGH

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2022-Ohio-2100.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-A-0029 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas KYLE VAUGHN WRIGHT, JR., a.k.a. KYLE V. WR

Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 7, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01343-CV MATT MALOUF, 635 PHILLIPS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 635 PHILLIPS ASSOCIATES, LLC, AND MINERVA PARTNERS, Appellants

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2022-Ohio-1815.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2021-L-107 2021-L-108 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeals from the -v- Wil

[Cite as In re J.B., 2022-Ohio-3488.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 2022-G-0030 J.B. Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division

CLEARY, Chief Judge (dissenting) I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Minn. Stat. § 6.481 (2016) does not violate the separation-of-powers requirements of article III, section 1 of the Minnesota Constitution. While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that auditing counties is a core function of the state auditor vested in her constitutional office by the framers of the Minnesota

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2021-Ohio-2133.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28831 : v.

JUSTICE MCKINNON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Britney Porsche Hooper (Hooper) appeals from the judgment entered in the Third Judicial District Court, Deer Lodge County, finding her guilty of aggravated burglary, a felony, in violation of § 45-6-204(2)(b)(ii), MCA (2013); elder abuse, a felony, in violati

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Sep 15 2016, 7:58 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), CLERK this Memorandum Decision shall not be Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court regarded

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Feb 05 2016, 8:45 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Susan E. Schultz Gregory F. Zoeller Corydon, Indiana

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § GREGORY B. MAFFEI, ALBERT § E. ROSENTHALER, MATT § GOLDBERG, JAY C. HOAG, § § BETSY MORGAN, GREG § O’HARA, JEREMY PHILIPS, § TRYNKA SHINEMAN BLAKE, § JANE JIE SUN, ROBERT S. § WIESENTHAL, LARRY E. § ROMRELL, J. DAVID WARGO,

[Cite as State v. Wright, 2016-Ohio-5465.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 6-15-14 v. DANIEL RAY WRIGHT, AKA DANNY RAY WISECUP, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hardin County Common Pleas Court

Illinois Official Reports Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of Appellate Court this document

[Cite as State ex rel. Wright v. Lake Cty. Clerk of Courts, 2019-Ohio-1300.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. : PER CURIAM OPINION NAQUAN A. WRIGHT, : Relator,