Cases

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Christopher Bosh, challenges a nonfinal “Order on Status Hearing” in an action for domestication and modification of a Maryland child custody order. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B) and 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) because part of the order is in the nature of an injunction and part of the order determines jurisdiction over the parties.

PER CURIAM: William E. Alton, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alton v. Mathis, No. 8:07-cv-01499-AW (D.Md. Apr. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m

Courtney Arrington appeals from a judgment dismissing his legal-malpractice action for want of prosecution. In October 2001, Arrington was tried and convicted of capital murder; he was subsequently sentenced to serve life in prison without the possibility of parole. In September 2003, Arrington, acting pro se, filed the present action against Erskine Mathis and Belinda Weldon ("the defendants"), who represented him in connection with his murder trial. Arrington's complaint, as

MODIFIED OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING GRIFFIS, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. The previous opinion of this Court is withdrawn and this opinion substituted. We grant the State’s motion for rehearing and supplement the record to include documents to address the problems raised in the previous opinion and eliminate the necessity of a remand of this case. ¶ 2. James C. Mathis wa

COLEMAN, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Following his divorce, Vennit Mathis, individually and as next friend of his two minor children, sued Dr. Charles Brent for tortious interference of a mar*844riage contract, alienation of affection, and reckless infliction of emotional distress. Dr. Brent moved for summary judgment on the children’s claims, but th

Hunstein, Justice, dissenting. Today, the majority holds Bruce Mathis, a defamation defendant, wholly unaccountable for damaging statements he made on an Internet discussion forum about a private individual, Thomas C. Cannon. In my opinion, Mathis should be held accountable for speech that exceeded the scope of legitimate criticism and instead fell within the range of reckless falsehoods against a private-plaintif

BRANTLEY, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Cornelius and Sonja Parks (Parkses) filed a petition for a will contest in the Chancery Court of Clarke County asserting that they were the natural, illegitimate children of T. Edgar Mathis and requested that the last will and testament be declared void. Their request was denied based on a failure to timely file a claim of inheritance. On appeal, the Parkses argue that the sta

In this wrongful death action the plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in not allowing the plaintiff to disclose to the jury that the defendants had insurance coverage, after defense counsel had argued insurance information to the jury; and (2) whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury with regard to the defense of contributory negligence. We affirm. Johnnie S

BRIDGES, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. On December 27, 2000, Charles and Marie Mathis sued the Jackson County Board of Supervisors after Charles suffered an injury at the Whispering Pines Golf Course, a county golf course. At the time of his injury, Charles was a volunteer marshal for the golf course. On October 21, 2004, the Jackson County Circuit Court held that Charles qualified as an employee of the golf cours

Andrews, Judge. The Supreme Court having reversed the judgment of this court in Talley v. Mathis, 212 Ga. App. 330 (441 SE2d 854) (1994), that judgment is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. Judgment reversed. Birdsong, P. J., and Pope, P. J., concur.

Carley, Justice. Appellant-plaintiff filed suit, seeking to recover a share of the proceeds of the winning ticket in a lottery sponsored by the State of Kentucky. According to the allegations of appellant’s complaint, he and appellee-defendants had agreed to purchase the ticket jointly and to share the proceeds if they won. Appellees moved to dismiss on the ground that the alleged agreement was unenforceable as against public

212 Ga. App. 330 (1994) 441 S.E.2d 854 TALLEY v. MATHIS et al. A93A1986. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 22, 1994. Reconsideration Denied March 9, 1994. Jones, Byington, Durham & Payne, Frank H. Jones, Davis, Gregory & Christy, Hardy Gregory, Jr., for appellant. Brinson, Askew, Berry, Se

MURPHY, Judge. *651 When a non-capital defendant's trial counsel fails to object, or consents, to a sua sponte mistrial declared for "manifest necessity," the trial judge's decision to declare the mistrial is unpreserved and not subject to appellate review. However, where

782 F.Supp.2d 1331 (2011) CYBER ZONE E-CAFE, INC., a Florida limited liability company, Jeffrey M. Reed, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, State Attorney, Fifth Judicial Circuit, Ed Dean, Sheriff of Marion County, Florida, Samuel Williams, Police Chief, Ocala, Florida, Defendants. Case No. 5:10-cv-149-Oc-10GRJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division.

02/25/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 29, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ERIC JOSEPH MATHIS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County Nos. 110691, 113151, 113785, 118415 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2024-00376-CCA-

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2368 Doc: 51 Filed: 06/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2368 ANTHONY GORDON MATHIS Plaintiff - Appellant v. TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES, INC.; DARLING INGREDIENTS, INC. Defe

786 F.Supp. 971 (1991) Mose MATHIS and Sidney Mathis, Plaintiff, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Counter-claimant, v. Mose MATHIS and Sidney Mathis, Counter-defendant. Civ. A. No. 4:91-CV-24-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Division. December 30, 1991. *972

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2719 CHAD E. MATHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a.k.a. METLIFE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distri

[Cite as State v. King, 2023-Ohio-860.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT GREENE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2022-CA-38 : v.

31 So.3d 242 (2010) KING 205, LLC and Douglas Ferrell, Appellant, v. DICK PITTMAN ROOF SERVICES, INC., et al., Appellee. No. 5D08-3529. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 19, 2010. *243 D. Brad Hughes of D. Brad Hughes, P.A., St. Johns, for Appellant. Sandra J. Mathis and Cristine M. Russell of Roge