Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. On January 10, 2014, Richard W. Barry, Chapter 11 Trustee (the “Trustee” or the “Plaintiff’) for the estate of Liberty State *226Benefits of Delaware, Inc. (“LSBDE”), Liberty State Benefits of Pennsylvania, Inc. (“LSBPA”), Liberty State Financial Holdings Corp

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0125p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATTI JO CAHOO, KRISTIN MENDYK, and KHADIJA COLE, │ individuals and

Justice KITTREDGE. This case arises from a construction dispute. The contract between the general contractor and subcontractor provided for arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. When a complaint was filed, Appellant Sean Barnes, the general contractor, and Appellant Wando E., the property owner, sought to enforce the construction contract’s arbitration clause. The trial court refused to compel arbitration on the

531 F.Supp.2d 365 (2007) The REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA INC., et al., Defendants. No. 04-CV-4372 (NGG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 19, 2007. *366 *367 *368 *369

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Pamela Booker sued New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, MTGLQ Investors, L.P., and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFA”), 815

24-2138 United States v. Liounis In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2025 No. 24-2138 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. PETER LIOUNIS, Defendant-Appellan

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Appellate Case: 26-6019 Document: 91-1 Date Filed: 06/30/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of PUBLISH Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHINA UNICOM (AMERICAS) No. 22-70029 OPERATIONS LIMITED, Petitioner, OPINION v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission Argued and Submitted February 15, 2023

*835MEMORANDUM ORDER Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge William Weiss, Robert Lessman, Ann Harrell and Eddie Harrell (“Plaintiffs”) assert class action, claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, as well as claims for unjust enrichment, alleging that Defendants engaged in a conspira

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0139p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMPOS (25-1965); JUAN │ CARLOS SANCHEZ ALVAREZ (25-1969); J

The City of Laredo appeals from the judgment of the district court of Travis County which affirmed, in large part, the final determination by the Texas Water Rights Commission of claims of water rights in the Middle Rio Grande. The "Middle Rio Grande" includes the Rio Grande and contributing Texas tributaries *Page 259 from Amistad Dam, in Val Verde County, downstream to Falcon Dam, in Starr County, and includes all or parts of Val Verde, K