⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mathew Robert Potter”

In Re Potterpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2007-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 377 B.R. 305; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3465; 2007 WL 2932776
377 B.R. 305 (2007) In re Jeffery W. POTTER, Debtor. No. 7-05-14071 MS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico. October 1, 2007. *306 Jeffery Watson Potter, pro se. Martin S. Friedlander, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellant. George M. Moore, Moore, Berkson & Gandarilla, Alice Nystel Page, Clifford C. Gramer, Jr., Will
California Court of Appeal · 2023-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/8/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, A166490 v. POTTER HANDY, LLP, et al., (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC-22-599079) Defendants and
Mahomes v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2008-11-20 · Published · cited 5× · 590 F. Supp. 2d 775; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94977; 2008 WL 4960233
(2008) Beverly MAHOMES, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. C.A. No. 2:06-3634-CWH. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. November 20, 2008. ORDER C. WESTON HOUCK, District Judge. On December 27, 2006, the plaintiff, Beverly Mahomes (the "plaintiff"), filed this suit against the
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
Nebraska Advance Sheets 732 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS maximize speed and efficiency of distributions while minimiz- ing expenses. Thus, the court today correctly declines the appellant’s invi- tation to expand its review under the waiver rule to evidence outside of the divorce decree and the associated property settlement agreement. But a better approach is available, and I commend it to the Legislature. Paul D. Potter, appellant, v. Board of R egents of the
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT LENOIS, on behalf of ) himself and all other similarly situated ) stockholders of ERIN ENERGY ) CORPORATION, and derivatively on ) behalf of ERIN ENERGY ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 865 So. 2d 1024; 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 1065; 2004 La. App. LEXIS 138; 2004 WL 205844
| WOODARD, Judge. The Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s ruling to decertify the class in this action. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. * * * This dispute concerns whether a class action is the proper procedural method for adjudicating the Plaintiffs’ claims. The underlying claims involve burial insurance policies that Central State Life Insura
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014-04-17 · Published · cited 28× · 89 A.3d 107; 29 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1165; 2014 WL 1491761; 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 104
McLEESE, Associate Judge: Appellant Robert Grimes seeks review of the Superior Court’s dismissal of his claims against the District of Columbia, Business Decisions Information Inc. (“BDI”), and Welton Williams, BDI’s Chief Operating Officer. 1 Mr. Grimes’s claims arise from the District’s hiring of BDI to investigate Mr.
Shawe v. Eltingpublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-02-13 · Published · cited 59× · 157 A.3d 142; 2017 WL 563180; 2017 Del. LEXIS 61
SEITZ, Justice: Philip Shawe appeals an order of the Court of Chancery sanctioning him for misconduct throughout litigation with his current business partner and former romantic partner, Elizabeth Elting. After an evidentiary hearing, the Court of Chancery found that Shawe deleted documents from his computer, recklessly failed to safeguard his cell phone, improperly gained acces
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TWITTER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM ) ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, ) INC., and X HOLDINGS II, INC., ) ) D
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002-03-04 · Published · cited 58× · 282 F.3d 542; 2002 WL 334149
*544 McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Roger Jeseritz appeals from a final judgment entered in the district court 2 granting summary judgment favor of the United States Postal Service (USPS) on his employment discrimination claims under the Rehabilitatio
Shawe v. Eltingpublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-02-13 · Published · cited 53× · 157 A.3d 152; 2017 WL 563963; 2017 Del. LEXIS 62
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PHILIP R. SHAWE and SHIRLEY § SHAWE, § No. 423, 2016 § § Respondents Below- § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. §
Sprole v. Sprolepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1337; 50 N.Y.S.3d 178
McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ames, J.), entered November 16, 2015 in Tompkins County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion to access his share of equitable distribution. Pursuant to a September 2015 judgment, plaintiff (hereinafter the husband) and defendant (hereinafter the wife) were granted a divorce. Among other things, Supreme Court divided the parties’
Sprole v. Sprolepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 2× · 148 A.D.3d 1337; 50 N.Y.S.3d 178
McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ames, J.), entered November 16, 2015 in Tompkins County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion to access his share of equitable distribution. Pursuant to a September 2015 judgment, plaintiff (hereinafter the husband) and defendant (hereinafter the wife) were granted a divorce. Among other things, Supreme Court divided the parties’
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE MCCORMICK LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734
Ohio Supreme Court · 2016-07-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2016 Ohio 5085; 147 Ohio St. 3d 317; 65 N.E.3d 713
Per Curiam. *318 {¶ 1} Respondent, Darwin Richard Roseman of Westerville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0064756, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995. Relator, Columbus Bar Association, charged him with neglect and dishonesty in a single client matter and engaging in a pattern of miscond
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2015-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
067-250449-11 FILED TARRANT COUNTY 4/30/2015 5:03:18 PM THOMAS A. WILDER CAUSE NO. 067-250449-11
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-02-07 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 137 CA 13-01150 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF SMALL SMILES LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------- KELLY VARANO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT JEREMY BOHN, SHANNON FROIO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT SHAWN DARLING, BRENDA FORTINO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT JULIE FORTINO, MARIE
State v. Bourquepublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 415 A.2d 1095; 1980 Me. LEXIS 610
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION. After trial without jury, Paul L. Bourque was convicted of driving to endanger. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1314. The sole issue raised by the defendant on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. There was presented at trial credible evidence sufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that Bourque operated a motor vehicle in such a manner as to endanger persons and property. The evidence likewise warrante
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 351 CA 13-01103 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF SMALL SMILES LITIGATION --------------------------------------------------- KELLY VARANO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT JEREMY BOHN, SHANNON FROIO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT SHAWN DARLING, BRENDA FORTINO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF INFANT JULIE FORTINO, MA
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. MITCHELL WILLIAMS REDDIN, Appellee. No. 2D22-3853 December 15, 2023 Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Debra Roberts, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney