⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mathai v. United States”

United States Court of Military Appeals · 1992-01-27 · Published · cited 9× · 34 M.J. 33; 1992 CMA LEXIS 2; 1992 WL 9892
Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Appellant was tried at Goeppingen, Federal Republic of Germany, before a general court-martial which included enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of rape, adultery, and kidnapping, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, 5 years
Nekoroski v. Mathaipublic domain
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 1× · 30 Mass. L. Rptr. 485
Billings, Thomas P., J. OpenRisk LLC (“OpenRisk”) is a Delaware limited liability company. It was formed to develop a platform to estimate the potential financial loss to a portfolio of real property resulting from natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes. The plaintiffs (herein, the “Derivative Claimants,” collectively with OpenRisk, the “OpenRisk Parties”) are members and managers of OpenRisk. T
Jones v. MATHAIpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 758 F. Supp. 2d 443; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136393; 2010 WL 5420282
758 F.Supp.2d 443 (2010) Kent JONES, Plaintiff, v. Bency MATHAI, Defendant. Case No. 06-11925. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 27, 2010. *444 Daniel D. Quick, Dickinson Wright, Bloomfield Hills, MI, Michelle R. Heikka, Dickinson Wright, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. ORDER
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued June 2, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00708-CV ——————————— JACOB MATHAI, Appellant V. MAXI REALTY CORPORATION, Appellee On App
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 2× · 959 F. Supp. 2d 951; 2013 WL 3776580; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99803
ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss of the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and GRANTS the motion to dismiss of Dr. Steve Nelson. I. BACKGROUND This dispute stems from plaintiff Anna Mathai’s dismissal from th
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-01-07 · Published · cited 89× · 512 F.3d 1241; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 248; 2008 WL 62557
512 F.3d 1241 (2008) In re Daniel David WARREN; Kathleen Ann Warren, also known as Kathleen Ann Chalk, Debtors. Adrian Mathai; Zubin Mathai; OTE Development USA, Inc.; XXXX-XXXX Quebec, Inc., doing business as OTE Canada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Daniel David Warren; Kathleen Ann Warren, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-4278. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Janu
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jorge F. ACEVEDO, Staff Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 17-0224 Crim. App. No. 20150076 Argued November 28, 2017—Decided Fe
Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before the Court Sitting En Banc! UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Private EZ MATTHEW L. COE United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20220052 Headquarters, United States Army Maneuver Center of Excellence Trevor I. Barna, Military Judge Colonel Javier E. Rivera, Staff Judge Advocate For Appellant: Colonel Philip M. Staten, JA; Jonathan F. Potter, Esquire; Major Bryan A. Osterhage, JA (on brief on remand). For Appellee: Colonel Richard A. Gorini, JA; Major
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 54× · 779 F.3d 113; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800; 2015 WL 774576
REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: Defendant Annie George appeals from a judgment of conviction and order of forfeiture entered on July 10, 2013,-in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Gary L. Sharpe, Chief Judge), after a jury trial at which *115 she
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, K.M. MCDONALD, D.C. KING Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID C. STREET SERGEANT (E-5), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 20130047
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, K.M. MCDONALD, M.K. JAMISON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEJANDRO TORRES LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201300396
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-02-21 · Published · cited 17× · 236 F. Supp. 3d 171; 2017 WL 685563
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 68 M.J. 587; 2009 CCA LEXIS 455; 2009 WL 4857364
BEAL, Judge (dissenting in part and concurring in part): Notwithstanding this court’s recent precedent,1 I respectfully dissent from the majority’s handling of the facial and as-applied challenge to the aggravated sexual assault charge; as to the remaining assigned errors, I concur. I cannot in good conscience affirm a conviction of aggravated sexual
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013-03-18 · Published · cited 2× · 489 B.R. 224
MEMORANDUM OPINION TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Chief Judge. In the world of bankruptcy, a debtor’s discharge is rarely denied by summary judgment. Most grounds for denial of a discharge require a finding that a debtor intended to mislead, conceal, or deceive. Although there are some undisputed facts in almost every case, it is difficult to have no genuine dispute of fact regarding an individual’s subjective intent.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2008-03-31 · Published · cited 7× · 385 B.R. 280; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 911; 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2020; 2008 WL 901853
385 B.R. 280 (2008) In re James Clinton GARLAND, Debtor. James Clinton Garland, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Department of The Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Defendant, and Richard A. Wieland, United States Trustee, Plaintiff, v. James Clinton Garland, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-73573. Adversary Nos. 05-8125, 06-8044. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma.<
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F.3d 916; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26619; 1995 WL 452485
61 F.3d 916 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Tun
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 52 M.J. 731; 1999 CCA LEXIS 321; 1999 WL 1565186
OPINION OF THE COURT UPON RECONSIDERATION SCHLEGEL, Senior Judge: Our original opinion in this case was unpublished (ACM 32840, 19 October 1999). On our own motion, pursuant to Rule 7-1 (a) of our Internal Rules, we elected to reconsider that opinion, and it was withdrawn pursuant to our order issued on 18 November 1999. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by members of rape
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2020-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION * UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ IN RE ALL PHASE ROOFING AND BAP No. WO-20-004 CONSTRUCTION, LLC, BAP No. WO-20-005 Debtor, IN RE RICKY SHARPTON, Bankr. No. 17-12414
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2015-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit February 2, 2015 Blaine F. Bates PUBLISH Clerk
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-08-29 · Published · cited 2× · 865 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96236
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Four years ago, following a seven-week trial, a jury concluded that defendants Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc., Harbert International, Inc., and Harbert Corporation (collectively, the “defendants”) 1