Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Mateo-Feliz v. United States”
United States v. Joubertpublic domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Robert Joubert was convicted of three counts of sexual exploitation of children, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), and one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). On appeal, Joubert raises four issues: (1) the search warrant failed to supply a nexus to the place being searched; (2) the district court abused its discretion in admitting testimony of uncha
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Todd Lyons and Daniel Eremian worked for Sports Off Shore (SOS), a gambling business based in Antigua. After a wide-ranging investigation by federal and state law enforcement of SOS and its employees and agents, and a lengthy trial, a jury convicted both Lyons and Eremian on two counts under the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084, two counts under RICO, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d), and one count under 18
United States v. Lyonspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 12-1835 12-1858 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. TODD LYONS and DANIEL EREMIAN, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B.
De-La-Cruz v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is Petitioner Juan DeLa-Cruz’s writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed on March 19, 2009 (Docket No. 1). The Government opposed Petitioner’s motion on August 3, 2009 (Docket No. 7) and Petitioner filed a reply on August 27, 2009 (Docket No. 8). On March 19, 2009, Petitioner filed the instant co
United States v. Ramirezpublic domain
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. On May 1 and May 15, 2003, two separate grand juries returned multi-count indictments against Dean Ramirez, Julio Cesar Lopez, Jose Antonio Vasquez, Eduardo Mozqueda-Ramirez and others for a variety of crimes stemming from a drug trafficking enterprise. The two cases were consolidated for trial, and a jury found defendants guilty as follows: Mr. Ramirez, Mr. Vasquez, and Mr. Lopez on oné count of co
United States v. Galaz-Felixpublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Carlos Armando Galaz-Felix appeals his sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment followed by ten years’ supervised release resulting from his conviction on counts involving violations of controlled substances, immigration, and firearms laws. Mr. Galaz-Felix argues that the recommended Guidelines sentence was im
United States v. Dean Ramirezpublic domain
479 F.3d 1229 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dean RAMIREZ, also known as Dean Castillo Ramirez, also known as Dino; Jose Antonio Vazquez; Julio Cesar Lopez; and Eduardo Mozqueda-Ramirez, Defendants-Appellants. No. 04-4305. No. 05-4108. No. 05-4099. No. 05-4111. No. 05-4103.
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Ramon Abreu (Abreu) appeals his conviction on charges of conducting a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and related firearm possession charges. I. BACKGROUND We summarize the facts in the traditional
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD
Rocky Freeman v. J. Lincalispublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 23-1566 ________________ ROCKY L. FREEMAN, Appellant v. UNIT MANAGER J. LINCALIS; PROBATION OFFICER JOHN D. MCCARTHY; SUPERVISING U.S. PROBATION OFFICER STEPHEN L. BRIGHTON; CHIEF PROBATION OFFI
Marco Antonio Perez v. State of Alabamapublic domain
Rel: May 1, 2026 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Wilson v. Eupublic domain
MOSK, J. I dissent. The court should forthrightly reject the fatally flawed proposal of the masters. I. In Karcher v. Daggett (1983) 462 U.S. 725, 732 [77 L.Ed.2d 133,142,103 S.Ct. 2653] (hereafter Karcher), the United States Supreme Court declared, “As between two standards—equality or something less than equality—only the forme
Legislature v. Reineckepublic domain
10 Cal.3d 396 (1973) 516 P.2d 6 110 Cal. Rptr. 718 LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners, v. ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor, etc., et al., Respondents. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Secretary of State, etc., Petitioner, v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., Respondent. THIRTY TWO MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Petitioners, v. RONALD REAGAN,
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Thomas Kelly & Sons, Inc. v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
6 Cal.App.2d 539 (1935) THOMAS KELLY & SONS, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent, v. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant. Civ. No. 9182. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two. April 29, 1935. Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Frederick von Schrader, Assistant City Attorney, and Grant B. Cooper and D. M. Kitz
Partido Popular Democrático v. Ferrépublic domain
SENTENCIA Por los fundamentos expuestos en las opiniones emitidas en esta fecha por el Juez Presidente Señor Negrón Fernán-dez, el Juez Asociado Señor Santana Becerra y el Juez Aso-ciado Señor Blanco Lugo, en la que concurren los Jueces Aso-ciados Señores Pérez Pimentel y Dávila, a la solicitud de mandamus, no ha lugar. El Juez Asociado Señor Rigau emitió una opinión disidente en la que concurren los Jueces Asociados Señores