Cases

KONDUROS, J. In this shareholder dispute case, Joseph E. Mason, Jr. (Son) appeals the special referee’s decision granting judgment on his causes of action including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, wrongful termination, and civil conspiracy in favor of Catherine L. Mason (Mother), Joseph E. Mason, Sr. (Father), Kathy St. Blanchard (Daughter) (collectively, the Masons), *3

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1560 Filed December 24, 2014 TRUSTEES OF THE IOWA LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND; and TRUSTEES OF THE IOWA BUILDERS RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiffs, vs. ANKENY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, BETTS & BEER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, GROVE MASONRY, INC., TWIN CITY CONCRETE PROD

741 F.Supp. 1472 (1990) Diana L. MASON, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Plaintiff, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 78-1337. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 6, 1990. *1473 *1474 *1475

USCA1 Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING This is a breach of contract action involving Ramex, a general contractor; Tamcon, a subcontractor; Standard, a supplier of materials; and Seaboard, Ramex’s surety. In our original opinion we reversed and remanded a jury verdict in favor of Tamcon and Standard. TAMCON’S MOTION FOR REHEARING Tamcon moved for rehearing, contending that certain evidence established

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Consigli Construction Co., Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company have each filed dispositive motions to resolve whether Travelers has a duty to defend Consigli in a state tort action brought by a subcontractor’s worker injured at one of Consigns project sites. Meanwhile, Consigli has moved to remand the case to state court. As a matter

BLACK, Circuit Judge: On December 29, 2001, a pleasure boat carrying 12 passengers abided1 with Appellant Superior Construction Co.’s (Superior) stationary barge. After a bench trial, the district court found Superior liable to the pleasure boat’s injured passengers and awarded a total judgment of $19,214,689.63 in economic and non-economic damages. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND

Case: 25-1812 Document: 159 Page: 1 Filed: 08/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC., PLASTIC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS, LLC, DBA GENOVA PIPE, MICROKITS, LLC, FISHUSA INC., TERRY PRECISION CYCLING LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. DONALD J. TRUMP, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF TH

895 F.2d 218 58 USLW 2528 Thaddeus Donald EDMONSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.LEESVILLE CONCRETE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-4804. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. March 1, 1990.As Corrected May 22, 1990. James B. Doyle, Lake Charles, La., for plaintiff-a

*726Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO, in which Chief Judge PROST and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL join. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judge HUGHES joins. TARANTO, Circuit. Judge. Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise provided in [the Patent A

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

ACCEPTED 06-14-00036-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 12-14-00123-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:39:11 PM

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the panel majority’s change in the right to jury trial of the question of unobviousness. The full weight of Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions is contrary to their ruling, as are the traditions and laws governing jury verdicts, and the constitutional guarantee. The Supreme Court has continually recognized the right to j

59 P.3d 412 (2002) 2002 MT 266 Bill FAVEL, John Pitzer, Joe LaMere, Toby LaMere, and Alvin Belgarde, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AMERICAN RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION CO., a California corporation; John Does I and II, Defendants/Respondents. No. 01-514. Supreme Court of Montana. Heard March 12, 2002. Submitted March 19, 2002.

OPINION AND ORDER Sweet, D.J. This action was tried before the Court between July 11 and July 12, 2017. Based upon all the prior proceedings, the findings of fact, and conclusions set forth below, judgment will be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Ronnie Van Zant, Inc., Gary R. Ross-ington (“Rossington”), Johnny Van Zant, Barbara Houston, as the Trustee of the Allen Collins Trust, and Alicia Rapp and Carinna Gai

STUART, Chief Justice. *903Aliant Bank, a division of USAmeribank ("Aliant"), sued various individuals and business entities involved in a failed effort to develop the Twelve Oaks subdivision in Odenville, alleging that, as a result of those defendants' conspiracy and wrongful actions, Aliant's security interest in the property upon which the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Defendants, Sturm Foods, Inc., and its parent company Treehouse Foods, Inc., manufactured single-serve coffee cups for use in Keurig machines and marketed them under the name Grove Square Coffee (“GSC”). The eight named Plaintiffs each purchased GSC, but were extremely unsatisfied with their purchase. They claim that Defendants packaged, marketed, distrib

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Under A.R.S. § 12-510, claims by governmental entities generally are not barred by statutes of limitations. For actions relating to real property, however, Arizona’s statute of repose provides that, “notwithstanding any other statute,” an action “based in contract” against certain identified parties mus