Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mason v. American Security Insurance Company”
American Security Life Assurance Co. v. Masonpublic domain
836 F.Supp. 333 (1993) AMERICAN SECURITY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, a North Carolina corporation, in liquidation, and James E. Long, As Commissioner of Insurance of the State of North Carolina and Liquidator of American Security Life Assurance Company of North Carolina, Plaintiffs, v. Raymond K. MASON, Sr., Rebuilding Service, Incorporated, and Geltech, Incorporated, Defendants. No. 93-494-CIV-5-H.
Mason v. American Prospect, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHATAQUOA NICOLE MASON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-2238 (LLA) v. AMERICAN PROSPECT, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Chataquoa Nicole Mason brings this action against Defendants The American Prospect (“TAP”)
Stephanie Lock v. American Family Insurance Companypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STEPHANIE LOCK, an individual, ) No. 79255-5-I ) Appellant, ) ) DIVISION ONE v. ) ) AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, ) PUBLISHED OPINION doing business in Washington,
Mason v. American Tobacco Companypublic domain
346 F.3d 36 James MASON, Billie June Richie, and Glenn Bailey, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA Incorporated, Lorillard Inc., United States Tobacco Company, Liggett Group Inc., Liggett & Myers, Inc., and Brooke Group Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
Mason v. Statepublic domain
Troy Wayne Mason v. State of Maryland, No. 1198 of the September 2022 Term, Opinion by Moylan, J. HEADNOTE: THE MISTRIAL MOTION: A PATCH OF ROUGH WATER OR HITTING AN ICEBERG? – A MOTION FOR A MISTRIAL: WHO MAKES THE CALL? – AN EXASPERATINGLY CONVOLUTED GLITCH – THE ABSENCE OF BAD FAITH – PRECISE PLEADING CALLS FOR MORE THAN UNDIFFERENTIATED ANGST – THE ABSENCE OF SIGNIFICANT PREJUDICE: “CALM SEA AND PROSPEROUS VOYAGE” – THE MISSION OF CAREFUL REDACTION – THE RULE AGAINST HEARSAY – A
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert F
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Jun 30 2025, 9:23 am Erie Insurance Exchange, CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Appellant Court o
Tatyana Mason, V John Mason And Laurie Robertsonpublic domain
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Jeffrey Benjamin Mason v. Keri Cotterman Masonpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00546-CV Jeffrey Benjamin Mason, Appellant v. Keri Cotterman Mason, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-16-001306, HONORABLE LORA LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
American Home Products Corp. v. Adriatic Insurancepublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. We granted leave to appeal, R. 2:2 — 3(b); R. 2:5-6(a), on June 5, 1995 to review the order of the Law Division which declined to dismiss or stay this insurance coverage action on comity grounds, in deference to an earlier action pending in New York’s state court. We conclude that the plaintiffs have shown sufficient “special equities”
In re Masonpublic domain
When the Debtor filed his bankruptcy petition, he owned a fifteen percent interest in Tier One Solar, LLC ("TOS"). On December 23, 2013, TOS borrowed the amount of $ 850,000.00 from Mutsy I, LLC ("Mutsy") pursuant to a Secured Convertible Promissory Note ("Note"). Mutsy is wholly owned and managed by Landress. On December 23, 2013, Mutsy advanced the amount of $ 820,000.002 to TOS.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Nancy Serrano Picón Peticionaria Certiorari v. 2023 TSPR 118 Multinational Life Insurance 212 DPR ___ Company Recurrida Número del Caso: AC-2022-0069 Fecha: 29 de septiembre de 2023 Tribunal de Apelaciones: Panel X Abogado de la parte peticionaria: Lcdo. Héct
Mason v. American Tobacco Co.public domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in this action seek to represent a class of “[ijndividuals who have received or are receiving health care services for the treatment of tobacco-related illnesses ... which services have been paid for, or are being paid for, by Medicare.” Mason v. American Tobacco Co., 212 *38F.Supp.2d 88, 90 (E.D.N.Y.2002) The defendants are
2025 IL App (1st) 232353 No. 1-23-2353 Opinion filed March 5, 2025 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2025 Term November 13, 2025 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
Crystal Mason v. Statepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00138-CR ___________________________ CRYSTAL MASON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 432nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1485710D Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Opinion by Justice Birdwell
Shannon Giles v. Geico General Insurance Companypublic domain
10/28/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2021 Session SHANNON GILES, ET AL. v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County No. 21354 J. Curtis Smith, Judge _____________________
Ciber, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Co.public domain
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Judge William J. Martinez Plaintiff Ciber, Inc. (“Ciber”) brings this action against Defendant ACE American Insurance Company (“ACE”) asserting claims for declaratory relief, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unreasonable delay or denial of benefits, and punitive damages. (ECF No. 37-1 ¶ 7.) All claims
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-FC-01160-SCT AMERICAN COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY v. HECTOR RUIZ, DOING BUSINESS AS LOS PRIMOZ CONSTRUCTION; RAUL APARACIO; JESCO, INCORPORATED; AND APPALACHIAN UNDERWRITERS, INCORPORATED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/12/2023 TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CHRISTOPHER HAILEY CORKERN LAWRENCE MATTHEW QUINLIVAN MICHAEL WAYNE BAXTER
SUMMARY ORDER Appellants (collectively, the “WTC Insureds”) appeal from a June 10, 2008, 2008 WL 2358882, opinion and order of the district court granting summary judgment to appellee Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance Company (“Allianz”), and the subsequent June 23, 2008 judgments in two actions pertaining to insurance coverage disputes over property and other damage resulting from the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade C