Cases

Case: 23-1501 Document: 66 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant LG ELECTRONICS INC., LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., GOOGLE LLC, Appellees v. GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC, Cross-Appellant ______________________

Case: 24-1285 Document: 107 Page: 1 Filed: 03/19/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee MASIMO CORPORATION, CERCACOR LABORATORIES, INC., Intervenors ______________________

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MASIMO CORPORATION, a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-1086-NAC ) JOE E. KIANI, ) Defen

Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge Masimo Corporation ("Masimo") appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) from a July 18, 2017 memorandum of decision and order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, adjudicating Masimo's claims against Sotera Wireless, Inc. ("Sotera") under the Cali

MEMORANDUM ORDER MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction In the continuing saga of disputes in this matter, Philips moved, prior to and during a status conference held on December 18, 2012, to limit the number of claims asserted by Masimo in both Masimo I and Masimo II, which Masimo opposed.1 During that t

(1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' RULE 12(c) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' ANTITRUST AND UNFAIR COMPETITION COUNTERCLAIMS; AND [Doc. No. 56.] (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RULE 12(c) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' UNENFORCEABILITY COUNTERCLAIM [Doc. No. 61.] MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge On February 1, 2019, Plaintiffs Wi-LAN Inc., Wi-LAN USA, In

Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE The case stems from the death of Agapita Marroquin after she had taken the generic prescription drug amiodarone. Plaintiff Gilbert Marroquin, Mrs. Marroquin's husband, brings seven claims under California law against Defendants Pfizer, Inc. ("Pfizer") and Mylan Institutional, Inc. ("Mylan") for strict products liability, negligence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION At the time of the last great antitrust battle in our courthouse — between the United States and Microsoft — Mark Zuckerberg was still in high

ORDER Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on several Motions of the parties. This patent infringement action relates to two patents—U.S. Patent Nos. 8,518,318 (“the ’318 Patent’”) and 6,547,094 (“the ’094 Patent’”), which both pertain to methods of manufacturing flexible plastic tubes and other thin-walled tubular containers. Plaintiffs Viva Healthcare Packagin

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Now before the Court is Defendant Adobe Systems Inc.’s (“Adobe”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Free FreeHand’s and Plaintiff Jabez Palmer’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) first amended complaint. ECF No. 20. The Court held a hearing on the motion on November 8, 2011. Having considered the parties’ briefing and arguments,

This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: August 12, 2024 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. The

Case: 24-1600 Document: 87 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAROLYN W. HAFEMAN, Appellant v. GOOGLE LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Appellees JOHN A. SQUIRES, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Filed 3/8/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE APPLIED MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, G062056 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01049441) v.

EDMON, P.J. *120This appeal concerns an aborted international business deal between Changzhou SinoType Technology Company, Ltd. (SinoType), a Chinese company, and Rockefeller Technology Investments (Asia) VII (Rockefeller Asia), an American investment *817

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Demetrius Manee bought a new Mercedes-Benz automobile. As it turns out, the car had many problems, so, after numerous failed attempts to fix it, Mr. Manee sued Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“Mercedes-Benz”), the car’s manufacturer, for violation of the Song-Beve

Filed 6/1/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ROCKEFELLER TECHNOLOGY B272170 INVESTMENTS (ASIA) VII, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BS149995) v. CHANGZHOU SINOTYPE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Defendant and Appellant. APPEA

Filed 7/8/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE AZIZ DAMAK, Petitioner, v. G065583 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023- ORANGE COUNTY, 01355579) Respondent;

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ASHOK MAYYA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0382-NAC ) EDWARD LEE, MATTHEW DURGIN, ) JAEWOO HWANG, RONALD WASINGER,