Cases

9 So.3d 1235 (2008) Susan MARTIN v. Mary S. BATTISTELLA. 1070394. Supreme Court of Alabama. November 26, 2008. *1236 Charles R. Gillenwaters, Alexander City, for appellant. Thomas A. Radney of Radney & Radney, LLC, Alexander City, for appellee. BOLIN, Justice. Susan Martin, doctor of veterinary medicine,

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry W. Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Martin’s claims against all but one Defendant without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 The Arizona State Retirement System (“ASRS”) operates a defined-benefit plan for employees of the state and participating political subdivisions, including the City of Chandler. Both employers and employees contribute to ASRS. The contribution amounts, and the benefits paid to a retired employee, depend on the employee

STUART KYLE DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: For the second time, we address whether we have appellate jurisdiction in this case. We previously recounted the case's convoluted history, see Williams v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. , 748 F. App'x 584 (5th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (" Williams I "), and here

635 N.W.2d 473 (2001) 2001 SD 123 ESTATE OF Leslie Mary MARTIN, Deceased. No. 21760. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs August 28, 2001. Decided October 10, 2001. *474 Thomas P. Tonner of Tonner, Tobin and King, Aberdeen, for appellants Melody Pullan and Susan Maestas. Kenn

Vermont Superior Court Filed 08/18/21 Caledonia Unit CIVIL DIVISION Case No. 21-CV-01074 VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT Caledonia Unit 1126 Main Street Suite 1 St. Johnsbury VT 05819 802-748-6600 www.vermontjudiciary.org Rebekah Martin v. Trevor Putvain, et al ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Title: Motion to Dismiss Defendants Trevor Putvain and Jennifer Ward (Motion: 1) Filer: Susan J. Flynn Filed Date: May 25, 2021 The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff seeks damages for the wrongful death of her daughter S

ORDER SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 30th day of September 2004, the Court called the above-styled cause for hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [# 58], and the *199parties appeared through counsel of record. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [# 58]; Plaintiffs’ “Memorandum

[Cite as State v. Martin, 2024-Ohio-2172.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113250 v. : BEN MARTIN, :

369 F.Supp.2d 887 (2005) Thad MARTIN and Susan Wilson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant. No. A-03-CA-475-SS. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. March 31, 2005. *888 Dennis C. Reich, Shari A. Wright, Houston, TX, Tod Aronovitz, Ba

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. li>This appeal stems from the imposition of sanctions on appellants, Gloria Lewis Martin, et al., and their attorney, Anundra Martin, in a suit for the enforcement of a mortgage. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the trial court. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On January 8, 2010, appellants, represented at the time by counsel Carol A. N

156 Ariz. 452 (1988) 752 P.2d 1038 In re the Marriage of Mary Maxine MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Richard George MARTIN, Respondent-Appellant, Union Oil Company of California, Additional Defendant. No. CV-87-0032-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. March 8, 1988. Reconsideration Denied May 3, 1988.

USCA11 Case: 21-10199 Document: 145-1 Date Filed: 07/16/2024 Page: 1 of 124 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10199 ____________________ SUSAN DRAZEN, on

588 N.E.2d 1291 (1992) Edward J. MARTIN, Appellant-Defendant v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 64A05-9108-PC-269. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fifth District. March 24, 1992. *1292 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana and Stephen T. Owens, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, for appellant-defendant.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act; 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e); Voluntary Dismissal; Attorney’s Fees and Costs; Totality of the Circumstances; Impending Statute of Limitations; Reasonable Basis for Claim. OPINION WILLIAMS, Judge. This vaccine injury case comes before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Review of the Special Master’s

MARTIN ICE CREAM COMPANY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentMartin Ice Cream Co. v. Comm'rTax Ct. Dkt. No. 1477-93United States Tax Court

*184 Siddoway, C.J. ¶1 Susan Champagne appeals the property distribution ordered upon the dissolution of her marriage to Damian Schwarz. She challenges the trial court’s characterization and distribution of several of her and Mr. Schwarz’s retirement and other investment accounts. The character of the accou

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs in Bloom and Groner (“appellants”) brought class actions claiming that mortgage lenders and others violated 12 U.S.C. §§ 2603 and 2607 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (“RES-PA”) as well as state law by failing to disclose the assessment of demand and recon-veyance fees. The district court dismissed both complaints, concluding that RESPA does not a

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge BEEZER joined. Judge LUTTIG wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The question presented on appeal in this breach-of-contract action is whether Humility of Mary Health Partners (“HMH Partners”), an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Youngstown, Ohio, is subjec

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-CA-00300-SCT HEATHER J. MARTIN; ANNETTE McKAY MARTIN, MOTHER AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS AT LAW OF LISA MAY; JUDY SMITH, MOTHER AND COURT APPOINTED CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF WILLIAM GREG SMITH; MAMIE IVY, MOTHER AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HEIRS AT LAW OF CALANDRA C. IVY, DECEASED; DELMONTEZ MAGEE; PAMELA LOUISE HARRIS; LORIE LEE ARMSTRONG; ANNIE STEVENS, MOTHER AND REPRESENT

572 N.E.2d 1073 (1991) 213 Ill. App.3d 487 157 Ill.Dec. 609 Raymond R. MARTIN, Sr., et al., Coadministrators of the Estate of Laura Martin, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. McDONALD'S CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-89-1314. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. May 3, 1991.