Cases

219 F.Supp.2d 895 (2002) George Allen MULL, Teresa Ann Mull, Percy Beard, and Brenda Beard, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANCE MORTGAGE BANKING CORPORATION; Amaximis Lending, L.P.; FirstPlus Home Loan Trust 1996-2; FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1996-3; FirstPlus Home Owner Loan Trust 1996-4; FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1997-1; FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1997-2; FirstPlus Home Loan

OPINION 1 BRENDAN LINEHAN SHANNON, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is a motion filed by Plains Marketing, L.P. (“Plains”) for leave to file an amended complaint (the “Motion”) [Adv. Docket No. 175], pursuant to which Plains seeks, inter alia, to amend its Complaint for Declaratory Relief to Determine the Validity and Priority of Asserted Liens

08/22/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 1, 2024 Session CALVIN BRYANT, III V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission (Middle Division) No. 0546-GL-XX-XXXXXXX-001 James A. Haltom, Commissioner ___________________________________

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge Appellants, who are oil producers, sold their product to SemGroup L.P. and affiliates (including SemCrude L.P.), midstream oil and gas service providers and the Debtors in the underlying Chapter 11 cases. SemGroup sold oil to and traded oil futures with Appellees, downstream oil purchasers. The producers took no actions to protect themselves in case of Sem-Group’

POSNER, Chief Judge. Five years ago, a nationwide class action was filed on behalf of hemophiliacs who had been infected in the early 1980s with AIDS virus (HIV) contained in blood solids manufactured and sold by the defendant drug companies for the treatment of hemophilia. Blood solids are manufactured from blood sold or donated to blood banks, and the defendants had failed e

OPINION 1 BRENDAN LINEHAN SHANNON, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are three motions to abstain, retransfer, and remand. The motions have been filed by various producers of oil and gas (the “Producers”) who sold oil and gas to the Debtors shortly before they filed for bankruptcy protection in this Court. By the motions, the Producers ask this Court to re

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Mary Richter v. Oakland Board of Education (A-23-19) (083273) Argued September 14, 2020 -- Decided June 8, 2021 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. Pl

Tatel, Circuit Judge: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri is currently detained at Guantanamo Bay, where he faces capital charges before a military commission. These petitions concern the conduct of Colonel Vance Spath, the military judge who presided over Al-Nashiri's case for four years. Shortly into his tenure-and without disclosing it to Al-Nashiri and his lawyers-Spath appli

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 10, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE EX REL. MARY E. CLARK v. VERNON A. WILSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 95D-2682 Carol L. Soloman, Judge No. M2001-01626-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 23, 2002 The State of Tennessee

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3395 Mary Anne Hedrich, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 99-C-719-C--Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge. Argued April 4, 2001--Decided December 19, 2001 Before Coffey, Manion, and Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judges. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. Mary Anne Hedri

Self, Judge. In this case involving the removal of three children from their parents' custody by the Coweta County Department of Family and Children Services ("DFCS"), the parents ask this Court to intercede and safeguard the constitutional and statutory rights afforded them before DFCS may take such a drastic measure. We agree with the parents' view that this "case is about much more t

Justice KETCHUM: This action arose from a dispute between a brother and two sisters concerning the authenticity of a power of attorney for the parties’ father and the validity of two deeds. Pursuant to the power of attorney, the brother, Gene Cook, conveyed two tracts of their father’s land in Wyoming County to himself. He later leased the land to Toney’s Fork Land, LLC. <

| ¡.GUIDRY, J. Defendant, Lionel Ingram, III d/b/a La Colours (La Colours), appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff, Vinc-son, Inc. (Vincson), in this action to annul a tax sale. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Vincson, a domestic corporation, purchased the property in question, consisting of two undeveloped lots in St. Tammany Pari

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01184-COA STACEY DAVIS APPELLANT v. JAMES LESLIE HENDERSON APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/04/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT GEORGE CLARK III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 10, 2019 Decided February 25, 2020 No. 18-3010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. STEVE JAMAL SMITH, ALSO KNOWN AS JABRAIL LOVE, APPELLANT Consolidated with 18-3016 Appeals from the United States District Court for

THARP, District Judge. Juan McGee, a civil detainee at the Illinois Department of Human Services’ Treatment and Detention Facility at Rush-ville (“Rushville”), brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that twenty-three 1 state officials, employees, and private medical professionals were deliberately indifferent

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frank A. Sedita, III, J.), entered August 23, 2016. The judgment, among other things, awarded plaintiff J.N.K. Machine Corporation damages as against defendants/third-party plaintiffs. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2016 VT 45