Cases

HICKS, J. **525 The plaintiff, Monica Anderson, appeals a decision of the Superior Court ( O'Neill , J.) dismissing her personal injury action against the defendant, the Estate of Mary D. Wood, as time-barred by RSA 508:4 (2010). We reverse and remand.

Affirmed without opinion.

On Application for Rehearing in Case No. 2090265 The opinion of September 17, 2010, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Scott Alan Anderson ("the husband") appeals from a judgment of the Morgan Circuit Court that divorced him from Annette Lynn Anderson ("the wife"), and he petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to grant his request for a temporary restraining order, which sought to prevent the wife fr

DEHOOG, J. Defendant appeals her conviction for failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged, more commonly known as “hit and run.” ORS 811.700.1 On appeal, she assigns error to the trial court’s award of restitution. Under ORS 811.706, which authorizes the imposition of restitution upon a conviction for hit and run, the court awarded restitution in the amount of $5,807.52, th

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1876 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Dissenting, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Mary Cocchiarella, Appellant, vs. Filed: August 31, 2016

PER CURIAM. This appeal and cross-appeal concerns the parties’ respective petitions for modification of permanent alimony. Appellant (Former Husband) petitioned the court for a decrease in his alimony obligation. Ap-pellee (Former Wife) counter-petitioned for an increase in both the alimony obligation and the amount of the life insurance policy Former Husband was obligated to maintain to secure the alimony, as well as an award

PER CURIAM Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration in this case because, notwithstanding that the disposition of our opinion said that we had affirmed defendant’s convictions except to the extent that we had otherwise reversed and remanded them, our opinion did not expressly state that we had considered two of her three assignments of error on their merits. We did consider and reject those assignments on their merits. We

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of unlawful delivery of heroin, ORS 475.850; unlawful possession of heroin, ORS 475.854; unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894; and two counts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.840(3) (2009), renumbered as ORS 475.752(3) (2011). She assigns error to the trial court’s entry of separate convictions for the two co

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On July 18, 2016, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant Shattuck-St. Mary’s School’s (“Shattuck”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 57]1 and Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Charol Shakeshaft [Docket No. 58] in the

440 November 21, 2013 No. 56 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. ALEM JONATHAN ANDERSON, Respondent on Review. (CC 05C51184; CA A135075; SC S058504) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted June 8, 2011; resubmitted January 7,

244 P.3d 1188 (2010) Mark ANDERSON, Applicant-Appellant v. Richard PURSELL; Henry R. Sebesta and Mary M. Sebesta Revocable Trust; and C & K Properties, Inc., Opposers-Appellees and Division Engineer, Water Division 2, Appellee pursuant to C.A.R. 1(e). No. 09SA119. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. December 13, 2010. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing

Johnson, J. ¶31 (dissenting) In the area of juvenile justice, the legislature expressly established what, where, and how juvenile criminal adjudications play a role in future proceedings. These comprehensive policy decisions are reflected in specific statutory sections. The majority rewrites and disrupts these legislative choices, essentially based on the majority’s disagreement with the explicit choices the legislature established.

JABAR, J. [¶ 1] This appeal primarily concerns whether a Settlement Agreement,1 which contains an arbitration clause, gave the arbitrator the authority to determine whether the Agreement was valid and enforceable. We conclude that it did and affirm the judgment of the Superior Court. [¶ 2] Carrie B. Anderson, Deborah Collins, Liela Johnson, and Rebecca York (collectively, the

OPINION JANE BRANSTETTER STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Mary Armbruster sued Burt Hoey in Michigan state court for negligence. *758 Western World, Hooey’s commercial general-liability insurer, agreed to defend Hoey but reserved the right to deny coverage. All parties then sought a

William L. Mallory Jr., Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Brandon Anderson, appeals from his convictions for murder (with a firearm specification) and having a weapon while under a disability. He challenges on appeal alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct, the trial court’s decision to allow a witness to be recalled for the purpose of allowing that witness to change his testimony, the weight and sufficiency of the evide

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge THACKER and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. OPINION GREGORY, Circuit Judge: Albert DiFederieo, a former naval commander, was serving as a civilian contractor for the State Department in Pakistan when he was killed in a terrorist attack on th

OPINION Harvey Brown, Justice Manfred Fink is a physics professor at The University of Texas at Austin. ’ He invented a technology that UT patented and licensed to a private entity, IsoSpec, for development and marketing. UT obtained an equity interest in IsoSpec. , Some of the IsoSpec investors sued Fink, alleging common-law fraud and securities fraud, for statements he allegedly made

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana City of Boonville, FILED Appellant-Defendant, May 28 2025, 9:10 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

348 B.R. 652 (2006) In re Patrick ANDERSON and Sandra Bankowski-Anderson, Debtors. No. 06-10297 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. August 31, 2006. *653 *654 Richard D. Becker, Esquire, Becker & Becker, P.A., Newark, DE, for Sussex County Federal Credit Union. Cynthia L. Ca

47 Cal.4th 92 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BARRY LANE ANDERSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S152695. Supreme Court of California. July 23, 2009. *98 Kat Kozik, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderso