Cases

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed March 16, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, BY AND THROUGH ELAINE FLEMING, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal

Order entered May 19, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Order entered January 27, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE BY AND THROUGH ELAINE FLEMING, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee

Order entered March 5, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Order entered January 6, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, BY AND THROUGH ELAINE FLEMING, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee

Order entered January 30, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Cou

Order entered March 4, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00414-CV MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant V. HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Rel: May 1, 2026 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2

10/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 19, 2022 Session MARY CAUSBY JACKSON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SAMARA ELIZABETH JACKSON v. LENITA H. THIBAULT, M.D., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sullivan County No. C41505 (M) J

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00174-CV ____________________ MICHAEL BOOTH, THOMAS ALLEN, ROBERT SPAAK, RANDY GLESSNER, COURTNEY WILLIAMS, VALERIA J. SPAAK, MARY ALLEN, ROBERT W. THOMAS SR., AND THERESA M. WILLIAMS, Appellants

CHANG, District Judge. Mary Richards filed this lawsuit against her employer, U.S. Steel As the case comes to us, all that remains is an Illinois state-law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. On that claim, the district court entered summary judgment against Richards on the ground that it is preempted by the Illinois Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/8-lll(D). Alt

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

GRIFFIS, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal arises from a medical-malpractice suit filed on behalf of the deceased, Joe Carnathan. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants due to Mary Carnathan’s failure to properly designate an expert witness and supply an expert affidavit. We find no error and affirm.

COX, Circuit Judge: I. Introduction The plaintiff filed in state court this putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933. The defendants removed the case to federal court. Plaintiff filed a timely motion to remand to state court, arguing that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 precludes removal. The distric

GRIMES, Acting P. J. *856*498M.M. appeals the appointment of a conservator under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS) ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq. ) after a jury found him to be gravely disabled due to a mental disorder. He does not challenge t

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge This appeal arises from a lawsuit involving the parties' failed business relationship in which the plaintiffs asserted claims of a breached partnership, conversion, breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The results at trial were mixed, as is our disposition on appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part. The parties' relationship had an inauspicious beginning. Lowell Aughenbaugh and T

¶ 31. REILLY, RJ. (concurring). I join with the majority that the question of immunity from prosecution under Wis. Stat. § 961.443(l)(a) should be decided pretrial by the circuit court and that Marie Williams has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to immunity under the statute. I also agree with the majority's conclusion that the immunity would only apply to Williams' ch

McGEE, Chief Judge. *169 Kwanissda Williams ("Defendant") appeals her convictions on charges of resisting a law enforcement officer ("resisting") and assault inflicting serious bodily injury on a law enforcement officer ("AISBI"). Defendant contends the trial court erred by denying her pretr

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (FC-CR. NO. 15-1-1143) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER Affirm.

MOORE, J. 11 Wanda Magee, in proper person, appeals a summary judgment that dismissed her dental malpractice claims arising from two procedures following a dental implant. She contends her periodontist, Dr. Charles Williams, did not obtain her informed consent for the followups. For the reasons expressed, we affirm. Factual Background Ms. Magee first came to Dr. Williams in