Cases

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wanda Walker brings a Title VII claim of retaliation and hostile work *271environment following her termination from the Defense Intelligence Agency ("DIA" or "Defendant"). Plaintiff, a former Security Specialist at the DIA, alleges that she

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Village of Ossining and David M. Caputo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered October 15, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to renew and reargue their prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meani

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree burglary, identity theft, and second-degree theft. We reject without written discussion her assignment of error challenging the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquittal on the first-degree burglary conviction. We write only to discuss her remaining assignment of error, which concerns the imposition of court-appointed attorney fees. In th

PER CURIAM In this criminal case, defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of $400 in court-appointed attorney fees. Defendant did not object to the fees and asks that we exercise our discretion to review the assigned error as a “plain error.” See ORAP 5.45(1) (authorizing appellate courts to review an unpreserved error as an “error of law apparent on the record”).

Opinion LUI, J. David Earl Walker appeals from the orders denying his petition for resentencing/application to redesignate his 1988 and 1989 felony convictions for possession of a controlled substance as misdemeanors pursuant to Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Proposition 47 or the Act). (Pen. Code,

ORDER PER CURIAM. Jimmie L. Walker appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Walker’s request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 15) filed by Defendants L.P. Walker (“Walker”), O.V. Chavez1 (“Chavez”), and Kevin Murphy (“Murphy”) (collectively, “Defendants”) on January 28, 2013. The Court has reviewed the submissions of the parties and finds that, for the rea

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-01442-COA DOUGLAS WALKER A/K/A DOUGLAS L. APPELLANT WALKER A/K/A DOUGLAS LAMAR WALKER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/20/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHNNIE E. WALLS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: BOLIVAR COUNT

MCMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Otis L. Walker appeals from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska finding him guilty of conspiracy to commit bank larceny and bank larceny pursuant to a plea agreement and sentencing him to 46 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release, restitution in t

BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Following a trial in the Copiah County Circuit Court, the jury found Chance Walker guilty of capital murder, for a murder during the commission of a robbery. Upon conviction, Walker was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or early release. ¶ 2. Walker argues on appeal that the trial court erred by allowing prejudicial photographs to

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. Sheila Smith (“Sheila”) appeals from a judgment of the Clay Circuit Court ordering the sale of a certain parcel of land and the division of the proceeds therefrom. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for the entry of a new judgment. Sheila’s maternal grandfather was M.D. Amason (“Amason”). Amason’s children

746 F.Supp.2d 667 (2010) John DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert L. WALKER, et al., Defendants. Case No. RWT 10cv2646. United States District Court, D. Maryland. October 29, 2010. *669 Mary Catherine Zinsner, Troutman Sanders LLP, McLean, VA, for Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, Distri

Carley, Presiding Justice. Following a jury trial on May 30, 2003, Robert Lavon Hagins was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to 20 years in prison. On appeal, Hagins challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and also enumerated as error the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the jury panel due to alleged errors by the clerk in excusing possible jurors. The Court of Appeals affirmed in an opinion which

227 P.3d 242 (2009) 2009 UT 82 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Gary Wayne OSTLER, Deceased, Melissa Walker, on behalf of her Son, Adam Kunic Moses Walker, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Douglas L. Stowell, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gary Wayne Ostler, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20080180. Supreme Court of Utah. December 11, 2009.

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge On April 13, 2017, inmate Marques Davis died while he was in the custody of *1277the Kansas Department of Corrections and housed at the Hutchinson Correctional Facility in Hutchinson, Kansas. Plaintiffs Shermaine Walker (as administrator of Mr. Davis's estate) and I.D.F. (as a minor and heir a

CHIN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Ellis Walker brought this action below pro se, alleging that the conditions of his confinement in the Federal Correctional Institution in Ray Brook, New York (“FCI Ray Brook”) amounted to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The United States District Court for the Northern District of New Y

Chief Judge Rubén Castillo, United States District Court Norma Walker ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Walmart"), Charles Komar & Sons, Inc. ("Komar"), and Macy's Merchandising Group, Inc. ("Macy's") (collectively "Defendants"), alleging strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty claims related to injuries she suffered when her clothing caught fire. (R. 69, Fourth Am. Compl.) Before the

702 S.E.2d 415 (2010) WALKER v. The STATE. No. S10A0970. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 8, 2010. *416 Robert Kenner, Jr., Stone Mountain, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Marc A. Mallon, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Attorney Gener

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: On November 2, 2012, an underwater sonar device struck the mooring line of an offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico, causing substantial damage. Tesla Offshore, LLC was using the sonar device, known as a towfish, to survey the ocean floor. Tesla had chartered a vessel from International Offshore Services, LLC to pull the towfish. Shell Offshore, Inc., the owner of the drill