Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3176 ___________________________ Mary Kay Thomas Plaintiff - Appellant v. Marshall Public Schools, Independent School District 413; Members of the Marshall School Board

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Three couples assert that North Carolina’s Senate Bill 2 (“S.B. 2”), which allows state magistrates to recuse themselves from performing marriages on account of a religious objection, violates the Establishment Clause. But the plain *516 tiffs, all of whom are either marrie

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2013 Term FILED November 13, 2013 _____________ released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-1135

621 F.Supp.2d 188 (2008) R.K., individually and as parent and natural guardian of S.K.B., Plaintiffs, v. Y.A.L.E. SCHOOLS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-5918 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 30, 2008. *192 Joel Wayne Garber, Esq., Garber Law, PC, Voorhees, NJ, for Plaintiffs R.K. and S.K.B.

ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2

957 A.2d 407 (2008) 289 Conn. 135 Elizabeth KERRIGAN et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH et al. No. 17716. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 14, 2007. Decided October 28, 2008. *410 Bennett C. Klein, pro hac vice, with whom were Kenneth J. Bartschi and Mary L. Bonauto, pro hac v

142 F.3d 601 Mark WALDORF, Appellant in No. 97-5195,v.Edward J. SHUTA; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.;Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego;Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; CharlesDavid; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; William J. Ahern;William E. Conrad; Livio Mancino; Gary Rowinsky; MarioDibella; Vincent Scorese; Harry Grapenthin; Mary Kelly;Richard McCormack; Willia

78 F.3d 932 64 USLW 2591, 107 Ed. Law Rep. 552 Cheryl J. HOPWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees,v.THURGOOD MARSHALL LEGAL SOCIETY and Black Pre-LawAssociation, Movants-Appellants.Douglas CARVELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees,v.THURGOOD MARSHALL LEGAL SOCIETY, and Black Pre-LawAssociati

977 F.2d 764 61 USLW 2268, 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 39, 78Ed. Law Rep. 234 In re SCHOOL ASBESTOS LITIGATION.PFIZER INC., Petitioner,v.The Honorable James McGirr KELLY, Nominal Respondent,Barnwell School District No. 45, School District ofLancaster, Manheim Township School District,Lampeter-Strasburg School District, Board of Education ofthe Memphis City Schools, and a Conditionally CertifiedC

376 F.3d 323 Nazareth GATES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs,v.Thomas D. COOK, etc., et al., Defendants.Willie Russell, etc., et al., Plaintiffs,Willie Russell, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Sherwood Brown, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; Kevin Jordan, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated; John Nixon, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situat

569 S.E.2d 99 (2002) 212 W.Va. 23 STATE of West Virginia EX REL. Darrell V. McGRAW, Jr., in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of West Virginia, Petitioner, v. Gregory A. BURTON, Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Administration; Nichelle Perkins, Director of Personnel and the Department of Administration; Kay Huffman Goodwin, Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Education and the Arts; Mike Callaghan, Ca

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. I. Background Between 2008 and 2014, Stephen Manley, an African-American male, repeatedly applied for admission from the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University, historically black institutions. Each of Manley’s applications was denied. Manley, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, sued the law

[Cite as State v. Gonzalez, 2022-Ohio-2870.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111194 v. : MIGUEL A. GONZALEZ,

388 F.Supp.2d 484 (2005) Tammy KITZMILLER, et al., Plaintiffs v. DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. 04 CV 2688. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 7, 2005. Order Denying Reconsideration September 12, 2005. *485 Alex J. Luchenitser, Ayesha Khan, Richard B. Katskee, American

777 F.Supp.2d 445 (2011) Mohammed M. AHMED, Plaintiff, v. T.J. MAXX CORP., and The TJX Companies, Inc., Defendants. No. 10-CV-3609 (ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 11, 2011. *446 Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP, by James Aldo Vagnini, Esq., Jesse Curtis Rose, Esq., Robert John Valli, Jr., Esq., Of Couns

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THERESA SWEET; CHENELLE No. 23-15049 ARCHIBALD; DANIEL DEEGAN; SAMUEL HOOD; TRESA D.C. No. 3:19-cv- APODACA; ALICIA DAVIS; 03674-WHA JESSICA JACOBSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., Intervenor-Appellant,

885 N.E.2d 1060 (2008) Jerelyn YODER, Individually, and Jerelyn Yoder, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Teagan L. Yoder, Deceased, and Jerelyn Yoder, as Mother and Next Friend of Zachary S. Yoder, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James N. FERGUSON, Romar Transportation Systems, Inc., Ro-Mar Transportation Systems, Inc., Thomas I. Alexander, Jr., and Single Source Transportation Company, Defendants-Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-A

KELLY, Circuit Judge. In 2014, hackers accessed customer financial information from hundreds of retail grocery stores operated by SuperValu, Inc., AB Acquisition, LLC, and New Albertsons, Inc. A group of customers sued the stores. We previously affirmed dismissal of all but one of the suit's named plaintiffs for lack of standing. See In re SuperValu, Inc. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER T. JOHN WARD, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 179), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 194), and Plaintiffs Second Supplemental Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 213). In the motions, the named plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) seek certification of a class of motorists an

CONTI, Chief District Judge *286I. Introduction Pending before the court in this asbestos case initiated by plaintiffs Thomas D. Gorton, II ("Mr. Gorton") and Rhonda J. Gorton (together with Mr. Gorton, "plaintiffs") is a motion to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 4) filed by defendant Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and a motion to