Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mary J. Vaughn”
Vaughn v. Astruepublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Amos Vaughn appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Vaughn v. Statepublic domain
336 S.W.3d 180 (2011) Darren K. VAUGHN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 95284. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. March 8, 2011. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 12, 2011. Darren K. Vaughn, Jefferson City, MO, pro se. *181
Vaughn v. Drennonpublic domain
324 S.W.3d 560 (2010) Millard VAUGHN and Barbara Vaughn, Petitioners, v. Paul DRENNON and Mary Drennon, Respondents. No. 10-0226. Supreme Court of Texas. October 22, 2010. *561 Darrin M. Walker, Kingwood, TX, Robert Thomas Cain Jr., Clayton E. Dark Jr., Attorney at law, Lufkin, TX, for Petitioners. John H. Seale, Seale Sto
Vaughn v. Radio One of Indianapublic domain
ORDER ON DEFENDANT RADIO ONE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY . JUDGMENT SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE, United States District Court Southern District of Indiana "' This matter comes before us on Defendant Radio One of Indiana, L.P.’s (“Radio One”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. No. 64.] The motion is fully briefed.. [See Dkt. Nos. 72, 79.] For the following reasons, we GRANT Defendant’s Motion for Summary J
Vaughn v. Boerckelpublic domain
20 So.3d 443 (2009) Irene VAUGHN, Craig Fielding and Tamara Fielding, Appellants, v. Mary BOERCKEL, individually, and as Successor Trustee under the Eldert Boerckel Irrevocable Trust U/T/A dated August 18, 1993 as Amended and Restated on July 6, 2000, Appellee. No. 4D08-2419. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 21, 2009.
Vaughn v. Harveypublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Plaintiff-Appellant Mary A. Vaughn appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees (the Army) on her claim that she suffered retaliation, in the form of unreasonable accommodation of her disability, as a result of her complaints alleging that there was a racially hostile work environment.1 Vaughn also appeals the district cour
Vaughn-Walker v. Principipublic domain
PER CURIAM. Marie Vaughn-Walker appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vaughn-Walker v. Principi, No. CA-02-51-4 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti
Vaughn v. Drennonpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 310 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 311 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Vaughn v. Munnpublic domain
GRIFFIN, J. James and Sharon Vaughn [“the Vaughns”] appeal a final judgment awarding a money judgment in favor of Paul Munn [“Munn”]. Munn, who purchased a home from the Vaughns, obtained a verdict for breach of contract and fraud in connection with the sale. The Vaughns contend on appeal that there was no evidence of fraudulent nondisclosure but, mainly, the Vaughns claim the damage award was excessive. In his cross-appeal,
Mary L. Vaughn v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
04/13/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 23, 2017 MARY L. VAUGHN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hawkins County No. 15CR0223 John F. Dugger, Jr., Judge
New Addition Club, Inc. v. Vaughnpublic domain
I concur fully in Part III of the main opinion, in which the majority holds that the Club's appeal was timely. However, I respectfully dissent from the holding that the Club is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The record clearly reflects that the Club was well aware of Peter Crenshaw's violent propensities long before Mary Elizabeth Vaughn was killed. Ala. R.App. P. 28(a)(7) clearly required the Club to provide in its appellate brief "[a] full statement of facts relev
Agan v. Vaughnpublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: Ramsey Agan was convicted on three counts of bribery in the Superior Court of DeKalb County, Georgia. After exhausting his state remedies, Agan filed in federal district court a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This appeal arises from the district court’s denial of Agan’s petition. I. BACKGROUND
State v. Vaughnpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Vaughn, 2025-Ohio-2274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO PREBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2024-09-014 : OPINION AND - vs -
State ex rel. Vaughn v. Vaughnpublic domain
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) case. Dennis Vaughn (father) and Vanessa Vaughn (mother) were divorced in the Circuit Court of Russell County, Alabama in April 1985. The father was ordered to make child support payments of $162.50 per month for the parties' minor child. The payments were to be made to the maternal grandmother at the mother's request, and who, according to the divorce decree, had physical custody of
HUFF, Judge. Joseph Monerief (“appellant”) appeals the ruling of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County (“trial court”) registering *724 a foreign child support order. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in registering a North Carol
Vaughn v. Statepublic domain
410 S.E.2d 108 (1991) 261 Ga. 686 VAUGHN v. The STATE. No. S91A1213. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 15, 1991. *109 C. Paul Bowden, Walters, Davis, Smith, Weeks & Pittman, Ocilla, for Vaughn. Harry D. Dixon, Jr., Dist. Atty., Waycross, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Hines, Staff Atty.
NO. 12-11-00395-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MILLARD VAUGHN, § APPEAL FROM THE 273RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PAUL DRENNON AND WIFE, MARY DRENNON, APPELLEES § SABINE COUNTY, TEXAS
NO. 12-09-00064-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MILLARD VAUGHN AND, ' APPEAL FROM THE 273RD BARBARA VAUGHN APPELLANTS V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF PAUL DRENNON AND, MARY DRENNON, ' SABINE COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEES
State v. Vaughnpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/05/2023 08:06 AM CDT - 167 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 314 Nebraska Reports STATE V. VAUGHN Cite as 314 Neb. 167 State of Nebraska, appel
Vaughn v. Statepublic domain
Opinion by Salmon, J. The Maryland Court of Appeals, in Skok v. State, 361 Md. 52, 760 A.2d 647 (2000), made a significant change in the Maryland common law in regards to the circumstances under which a convict could overturn his or her conviction by filing a writ of error coram nobis. Id. at