Cases

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge. ^Defendant, Terrence Daniels, was convicted on counts one and two of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; on count three of second offense possession of marijuana; and on count four of possession of cocaine. Defendant was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment at hard labor, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, and a $1,000.00 fine ■ on counts one and two respec

OPINION Slomsky, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.;.277 II. BACKGROUND...277 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW.. .279 IV. ANALYSIS...280 *277A. Plaintiff Has Not Plausibly Alleged a Claim of Copyright Infringement Against Fox Defendants.. .280</

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury about the affirmative defense of renunciation. Defendant Raymond Daniels was charged with conspiracy and as an accomplice to certain robberies. Defendant did not request a renunciation charge and did not want one. There is no

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | ^Defendant, Terrence Daniels, appeals his convictions for felon in possession of a firearm, second offense possession of marijuana and possession of cocaine. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial, which was based on newly discovered evidence that allegedly easted serious doubt on the credibility of the officer who provided the probable cause affidavit for the search w

FISHER, Circuit Judge. Clayton Prince Tanksley is an actor and producer who lives in Philadelphia. In 2005, he created a three-episode television pilot, Cream , for which he received a copyright. In 2015, Fox Television debuted a new series, Empire , from award-winning producer and director Lee Daniels. Shortly thereafter, Tanksley filed suit, c

Petitioners Jonathan Greenfield, M.D., Jonathan Greenfield, M.D., P.A. (hereinafter "Dr. Greenfield"), and Tenet St. Mary's, Inc., d/b/a St. Mary's Medical Center (hereinafter "St. Mary's"), seek review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Daniels v. Greenfield,15 So.3d 908 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Achumba v.

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Daniel Scott filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Mary Benson provided him constitutionally deficient medical care. The district court denied Benson’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. We conclude that the district court applied the wrong constitutional standard and, therefore, vacate the denial of summary judgme

Paul L. Maloney, United States District Judge Plaintiffs accuse Defendants of violating the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. There is a pending motion for class certification. But, the injuries alleged by Plaintiffs arise from orders issued by state courts. And, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider claims that are functionally appeals of state court decisions. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit were defendants

PER CURIAM: Following a jury trial, Robert Daniels, a/k/a “Twin T” (“Daniels”), appeals his convictions and sentences for the following: 1) using a facility and means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce any individual who had not attained the age of eighteen, to engage in prostitution and any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a cr

913 A.2d 617 (2006) 172 Md. App. 75 Sonya Marie DANIELS v. STATE of Maryland. No. 223, September Term, 2005. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 26, 2006. *618 Stacy W. McCormack (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. *619 Jeremy

OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: Legal Voice, f/k/a Northwest Women’s Law Center (“Law Center”), appeals the district court’s denial of sanctions and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d) (“Rule 45(d)”). 1 We must determine first whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal and, i

1 Notice of Appeal incorrectly shows Eugene Daniels and Neal Moser as the cross-appellants. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 206 Dr. Neal Moser and Eugene Daniels (appellants/cross-appellees) appeal from a jury verdict in favor of CDB Bell, LLC, (appellee/cross-appel

270 B.R. 417 (2001) In re William F. DANIELS and Mary J. Daniels, Debtors. No. 00-32170. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 6, 2001. *418 *419 Jon Allen Broadworth, Roseville, MI, for Debtors. Collene K. Corcoran, Bingham, Farms, MI, Chapter 7 Trustee.

ORDER The request of Legal Voice f/k/a Northwest Women’s Law Center for publication of the Order filed March 31, 2014, is granted, and that Order, in the form filed concurrently herewith, is ordered published. ORDER Legal Voice f/k/a Northwest Women’s Law Center (“Law Center”) has moved for an award of attorneys’ fees on appeal. For th

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: A number of federal officers appeal a district court’s order allowing discovery and deferring a ruling on the defendants’ motion asserting qualified official immunity. We reverse and remand this case to the district court for that court’s consideration and ruling on the motion. BACKGROUND We need n

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,__________________ June 12, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A14A1802. MARY LOUISE DANIELS v. J. H. HARVEY CO., LLC d/b/a HARVEY’S SUPERMARKET. Mary Louise Daniels filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s order granting a motion in limine. In her notice of appeal, Daniels characterizes the order as one granting pa

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE FILED Karl Mulvaney Daniel G. Foote Oct 21 2016, 12:38 pm Jessica Whelan Tabor Law Firm, LLP CLERK Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals Indianapolis, Indiana

175 S.W.3d 889 (2005) Kimberly T. DANIELS and Willie Daniels, Appellants, v. Christopher A. YANCEY, M.D., and Diagnostic Clinic of Longview, P.A., Appellees. No. 06-05-00010-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted September 6, 2005. Decided October 25, 2005. *891 David M. O'Dell, Law Office of David M

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, March 18, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A14I0127. MARY LOUISE DANIELS v. J. H. HARVEY CO., LLC, d/b/a HARVEY'S SUPERMARKET. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 11A10095 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

5 N.Y.3d 738 (2005) 833 N.E.2d 704 800 N.Y.S.2d 369 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES DANIELS, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BYRON ROBINSON, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 26, 2005. Decided June 14, 2005.