Cases

Opinion issued May 24, 2012. <

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-IA-00158-SCT MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. v. MARY A. JOHNSON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/07/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LARITA M. COOPER-STOKES TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MALLORY M. STREET EUGENE R. NAYLOR YANCY B. BURNS

*355 Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge DUNCAN joined. AGEE, Circuit Judge: Mary Johnson (“Mrs. Johnson”) brought this suit against the United States seeking a refund of payments on a federal withholding tax penalty asses

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01225-SCT OLYMPIA WILLIAMS, MARY THOMAS, AND ALONZO JOHNSON v. MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/15/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. JAMES CHANEY, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ROBERT G. GERMANY SAM STARNES THOMAS

STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. ) JAVAN GONZALEZ, ) ) Relator, ) No. SD 36960 ) vs. ) Filed: April 15, 2021 ) HONORABLE LAURA J. JOHNSON, ) ) Respondent. ) PRELIMINARY WRIT OF PROHIBITION MAD

OPINION J. Steven Stafford, P.J., W.S., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Kenny Armstrong J., and William B. Aeree, Sp. J., joined. Intervening plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their petition to intervene in this wrongful death action. Discerning no error, we affirm.

BISHOP, J. The plaintiffs, Mary Beth Farrell and Vincent Farrell, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Brian J. Hines, M.D., and Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, LLC (Urogynecology).

Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge Appellant appeals the trial court’s decision to terminate his parental rights. He raises three points on appeal; Point I asserts the trial court erred in finding IJL’s adoption did not require Appellant’s consent; Point II asserts error in finding Appellant had abused or neglected IJL; Point III asserts error in finding Appellant failed to rectify the conditions leading to the assumption of jurisdict

Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge Appellant appeals the trial court’s decision to terminate his parental rights. He raises three points on appeal; Point I asserts the trial court erred in finding IJL’s adoption did not require Appellant’s consent; Point II asserts error in finding Appellant had abused or neglected IJL; Point III asserts error in finding Appellant failed to rectify the conditions leading to the assumption of jurisdict

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Affirmed and Opinion filed August 3, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals <

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 16-0096 444444444444 JULIE HERSH, PETITIONER, v. JOHN TATUM AND MARY ANN TATUM, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

Branch, Judge. Noel Chua appeals from an order of the Camden County Superior Court dismissing with prejudice Chua’s complaint against Jackie Johnson, in her capacity as the District Attorney for the Brunswick Judicial Circuit (the “District Attorney” or the “District Attorney’s office”). That complaint, which alleged a violation of Georgia’s Open Records Act, OCGA § 50-18-70 et se

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. Mary Johnson was charged with one count of devising and aiding and abetting the execution of a scheme to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, and 2. She was found guilty by a jury, sentenced to probation, and ordered to pay restitution. On appeal, she contends that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction and that she was tried in vi

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00500-CV Mary Ann JOHNSON, Appellant v. Chandler Elizabeth JOHNSON and Mary M. Johnson,

Chief Judge DREW delivered the opinion of the court, in which Senior Judge J. BROWN and Judge MINK joined. PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT DREW, Chief Judge: The United States brings this appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862, asserting that the military judge erred by abating the proceedings until the Secretary of the Ah' Force or her designe

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Because I believe the district court abused its discretion by failing to address the issue of forum shopping in its grant of voluntary dismissal, I respectfully dissent from the bulk of the court’s opinion. While I would find it unnecessary to reach the alternative question of whether the district court likew

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of State v. Heinz, 146 Ohio St.3d 374, 2016-Ohio-2814, 56 N.E.3d 965. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge *726Following a week-long trial, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff Mary Ellen Johnson against defendant Southwest Research Institute (SwRI). The jury found SwRI terminated Johnson because of her reports of sex discrimination, which is activity protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and discr

CUÉLLAR, J. **546*546On November 25, 1998, a Los Angeles County jury convicted defendant Cedric Jerome Johnson of the first degree murders of Gregory Hightower and Lawrence Faggins, and found true the multiple-murder special circumstance, arming, and perso