Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff Andrea Lashawn Grant seeks a judgment reversing the denial of her claim for Social Security Disability Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSI”). In the alternative, she seeks a remand to the Social Security Administration for a new administrative hearing. B

971 P.2d 1046 (1999) 193 Ariz. 185 MARY ELLEN C., Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY and Destiny C., Appellees. No. 1CA-JV 98-0130. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. January 19, 1999. *1047 Carol Coghlan, Phoenix, Attorney for Appellant. Mary C. McDonald, Glen

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMOTHY J. HARRIS, on behalf of ) himself and derivatively on behalf of ) Harris FRC Corporation and The Mary ) Ellen Harris 2011 Grantor Retained ) Annuity Trust, ) ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) ) and )

Matter of Mary Ellen H. v Joseph H. (2021 NY Slip Op 02567) Matter of Mary Ellen H. v Joseph H. 2021 NY Slip Op 02567 Decided on April 29, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Report

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 29, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARY ELLEN DeMARCO, as attorney ) in fact for DAVID DeMARCO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0804-MTZ ) CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER . Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA RODNEY S. PEDERSON, ) ) Supreme

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 809 CA 15-02157 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ. CRANE-HOGAN STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, INC., AND DANIEL C. HOGAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARY ELLEN BELDING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ABRAMS, FENSTERMAN, FENSTERMAN, EISMAN, FORMATO, FERRARA & WOLF, LLP, ROCHESTER (SHARON P. STILLER OF COUNSEL),

RCFC 26(c)(1); Protective Order; Redactions; Public Access to Court Documents. ORDER MARY ELLEN COSTER WILLIAMS, Judge On March 10, 2017, Defendant filed a motion for clarification or leave to file redacted copies of documents previously filed under seal. Briefing concluded on March 16, 2017. Defendant “proposes filing redacted versi

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00313-CV ____________________ IN THE ESTATE OF MARY ELLEN PELTIER _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 356th Distri

Tax Refund Suit; Valid Tax Return; Valid Refund Claim; 28 U.S.C. § 1346; 26 U.S.C. § 7422; 26 U.S.C. § 6511(b)(2)(A); “Look Back” Provision. OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Williams, Judge. In this tax refund action Plaintiff ;gro se 1 seeks the return of $46,697.17 levied by

*562 GRANT, Senior District Judge. Appellant Mary Ellen Byrne was an elementary school teacher in West Allis-West Milwaukee, Wisconsin, whose employment was terminated by the appellee Board of Education of that school district [“School Board”]. Alleging discriminatory treatment by the School Board because

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-841C (Filed: March 7, 2018) ************************** * AMPERSAND CHOWCHILLA * Motion to Compel; Expert BIOMASS, LLC, and MERCED * Invoices; Privilege; In Camera POWER, LLC, * Review; 26 U.S.C. §

Spent Nuclear Fuel; Fuel Characterization Costs; Motion for Reconsideration; Rule 59. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the Court’s decision denying Plaintiffs’ claims for fuel characterization costs. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. United States, 129 Fed.C

1Jn tbe mtntteb $tates <teourt of jfeberal <telaims No. 15-20T (Filed: August 16, 2017) FILED AUG 1 6 2017 *********** ** ** *** * *** *** * * U.S. COURT OF GREGORY ALAN H

MANSFIELD, Justice. An Iowa attorney neglected several client matters, delayed proceedings, failed to communicate with her clients, failed to respond to disciplinary inquiries, and made groundless allegations that prosecutors had engaged in wrongdoing. Previously, this attorney had received a sixty-day suspension of her license primarily for neglecting client matters, as well as

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-371L (Filed: October 23, 2018) ************************** * Summary Judgment; Fifth DELBERT and CATHY * Amendment Takings; National SCHULENBURG, et al., * Trails System Act; 16 U.S.C. §

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-371L (Filed: March 26, 2018) ************************** Summary Judgment; Class Action; Fifth * Amendment Takings; National Trails DELBERT and CATHY * System Act; 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d); Ind. Rev. SCHULENBURG, et al., *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1691C (Filed: January 3, 2019) ************************** * Motion to Compel; Attorney- CITY OF WILMINGTON, DELAWARE, * Client Privilege; Waiver; Clean * Water Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1323; Plaintiff,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00220-CV Clarence Davis, Appellant v. Mary Ellen Davis, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 14,237, HONORABLE DONALD V. HAMMOND, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION