Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 633 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 634 The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the order appealed from was a final judgment. We hold that it was not, an

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On February 28, 2012, Plaintiff Ashley Stanwood, along with other individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought a nationwide putative class action against three cosmetic companies, Mary Kay, Inc. (“Mary Kay”), The Estee Lauder

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 16-0098 ══════════ THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW, PETITIONERS v. JOHN TATUM AND MARY ANN TATUM, RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR R

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge: The False Claims Act makes liable anyone who “knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government.” 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(2). In this case, relators have raised allegations that the University of Phoenix knowingly made false statements, and caused false

898 So.2d 529 (2005) Albert B. CRUTCHER, Mary Lee Tullis Crutcher, Frederick J. Tufts, James Reiss, and Allison McAshan, Trustee of the 241 Trust v. J. David TUFTS, III, Claudia Liberto Tufts, Robert G. Tufts, Ruth G. Tufts, Charles Phillips, J. David Tufts, III, in his capacity as Trustee of the JDT/RGT Family Trust, and Hal Simeon, et al. No. 2004-CA-0653. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

[Cite as U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Crutcher, 2013-Ohio-2011.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION : : Appellate Case No. 25338 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 2012-CV-347 v. :

OPINION This matter is an appeal from the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas decision granting summary judgment in favor of Butler Township and the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers' Compensation, finding that appellant Mark Crutcher's alleged mental condition is not compensable under the workers' compensation system on the basis that he had not sustained an "injury" pursuant to R.C. 4123.01.

BEJACH, J. In this cause, Earnest Crutcher, Carrie Pollard, Marshall Watkins and Mary Watkins, his wife, who were plaintiffs in the lower court, appeal in error from judgments in their favor against the defendant, Larry H. Davenport, claiming that although the judgments recovered in the lower court were in their favor, said judgments were so grossly inadequate as to warrant a reversal and granting of a new trial. Earnest Crutcher

PER CURIAM: Appellant Tufts Energy LLC appeals the judgment of the bankruptcy court, as affirmed by the district court, rejecting Appellant’s claim of entitlement to receive an equity interest in Crutcher-Tufts Resources LP by virtue of a “Membership Agreement.” The bankruptcy court concluded that the determinative provision of that contract did indeed constitute a sus-pensive c

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D15-2337 _____________________________ PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MARY BROWN, as personal representative of the Estate of Rayfield Brown, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ___________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Harvey L. Jay, III, Judge.

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiffs Thomas and Diane Lloyd-Butler appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Mary Worrall and her corporation. They also appeal the denial of their motion for partial summary judgment. We agree with the Lloyd-Butlers that their motion for partial summary judgment should have been granted as to their claim for professional negligence; the defendants’ motion for summary

445 B.R. 361 (2011) In re KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Debtors. Kaiser Group International, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nova Hut a.s. and International Finance Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-2263 (MFW). Adversary No. 01-928 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 14, 2011. *362 Ma

MEMORANDUM OPINION JERRY A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the court on June 13 through 16, 2005 as a trial on the complaint of Trevor G. Bryan, as responsible party of Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. and Crutcher-Tufts Resources, L.P., the debtors, seeking declaratory judgment as to whether defendant Tufts Energy, LLC has a limited partnership interest in Crutcher-Tufts Resources,

687 F.Supp.2d 914 (2010) Michelle COLSON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AVNET, INC., Defendant. No. 09-603-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. January 27, 2010. *916 Daniel Lee Bonnett, Jennifer Lynn Kroll, Susan Joan Martin, Martin & Bonnett PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, Joel W. Ch

PER CURIAM: * Regarding plaintiffs’ complaint being dismissed with prejudice, primarily at issue is whether Delta Air Lines’ banning “Big Five” hunting trophies as cargo violates federal common or statutory law, or Texas state law. AFFIRMED. I. In August 2015, Delta announced: Effective immediately, Delta will officially ban shi

375 B.R. 120 (2007) In re KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Debtors. Kaiser Group International, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nova Hut a.s. and International Finance Corporation, Defendants. No. 00-2263 MFW. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. September 7, 2007. *121 Mark Minuti, Esquire, Saul Ewing LLP, Wilm

W. C. Sanders and the appellee, Mary Sanders, were husband and wife, living in the state of Oklahoma. They owned property there which they sold, intending to go to New Mexico and acquire public land there as a home. They had a family of ten children; but the five older ones were grown, and did not live with them. After having sold out their property in Oklahoma, W. C. Sanders one day told his wife that the wife of one of their sons was very sick, and she left on the train to go to her son's p

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: In this petition for review and cross-application for enforcement, the NLRB represents the charging party, the Marine Cooks and Stewards Union (Marine Cooks), against the Queen Mary Restaurant Corporation and its subsidiary, Q.M. Foods, Inc. (collectively, the Company). The Board foun

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge: Defendants Patriarch Partners, LLC, Patriarch Partners VIII, LLC, Patriarch Partners XIV, LLC, Patriarch Partners XV, LLC (together, "Patriarch"), Octaluna LLC, Octaluna II LLC, Octaluna III LLC (together, "Octaluna"), Ark II CLO 2001-1, LLC, Ark Investment Partners II, L.P. (together, "Ark"), and Lynn Tilton ("Tilton") move to dismiss Plaintiffs Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. ("Zohar I")

RULING RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 53) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Mary Barker, brings this case against UBS AG and its wholly-owned subsidiary, UBS Securities, LLC (collectively “defendants” or “UBS”), alleging that defendants terminated her employment in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s whistleblower provision (hereafter “S