Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Mary Cowger Moore”
Stone v. Warfieldpublic domain
MEMORANDUM LEGG, District Judge. On October 30, 1998, Mr. Donald D. Stone filed a pro se complaint against 99 defendants. The complaint runs 158 pages and includes 206 counts. Nearly all of the defendants have filed Motions to. Dismiss, to which Stone has filed extensive oppositions. As explained herein, the Court finds that the Complaint fails to meet the requirements of Rule 8 of the
Ramos v. Thornburghpublic domain
732 F.Supp. 696 (1989) Nelson RAMOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard THORNBURGH, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. Civ. A. No. TY-89-42-CA. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. July 21, 1989. *697 W. Michael Bonesio, Walter S. Cowger, Mary Spector, and Kare J. Sperstad-McElyea, Dallas, Tex., Ro
McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pohopekpublic domain
826 A.2d 474 (2003) 375 Md. 574 McELROY TRUCK LINES, INC. v. Alfons James POHOPEK. No. 106, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Appeals of Maryland. June 17, 2003. *475 Albert B. Randall, Jr. (Robert T. Franklin, Franklin & Prokopik, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner. David M. Kopstein (Dross, Levenst
Marilyn v. Statepublic domain
Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do
Marquardt v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.public domain
EAGER, Judge. This is a suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. for personal injuries allegedly due to defendant’s negligence. It is conceded that plaintiff and defendant were engaged in interstate commerce. Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $75,000 which was reduced, by a required remittitur, to $50,000. This appeal followed. The case was first submitted in Division One of this court, where an