Cases

Decisions of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Opinions. Affirmed.

Opinion by Salmon, J. The Maryland Court of Appeals, in Skok v. State, 361 Md. 52, 760 A.2d 647 (2000), made a significant change in the Maryland common law in regards to the circumstances under which a convict could overturn his or her conviction by filing a writ of error coram nobis. Id. at

HUFF, Judge. Joseph Monerief (“appellant”) appeals the ruling of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County (“trial court”) registering *724 a foreign child support order. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in registering a North Carol

¶51 Chambers, J. (concurring in result) — This is a sad case involving a doctor who, during a crisis, fought to save a newborn child by providing resuscitation for 24 minutes. Now the doctor is being sued because the child survived with severe permanent disabilities. I concur with the majority that the doctor is not liable under informed consent or negligence theories. I write separately to suggest a more limit

162 F.3d 1150 Jerome Cheathamv.Donald T. Vaughn, Superintendent, Davis, Capt., Pickens,Lt., Ansari, Lt., Blocker, C/O, Cooughlin, C/O,Mary Ann Williams, GrievanceCoordinator, Strickland,Lieutenant, Bearfield, Sgt. NO. 97-1892 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. June 25, 1998 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.97cv02756</

22 F.3d 300 Boreland (Emanuel)v.Superintendent Vaughn, Lt. Evans, Clark (Mary Ann), Lehman(Joseph), Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Attorney General) NO. 93-1272 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Mar 28, 1994 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., Reed, J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 10, 2013 Session MARY ANN LAYMAN v. THOMAS STUART LAYMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for McMinn County No. 27653 Lawrence H. Puckett, Judge No. E2013-00429-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 28, 2014 In this divorce case, the trial court granted Mary Ann Layman (“Wife”) an absolute divorce from Thomas Stuar

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Petty, O’Brien and Senior Judge Frank Argued by teleconference PUBLISHED JOHN BERRY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0204-20-4 JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY JULY 14, 2020

OPINION ON REMAND JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice. This appeal involves an ongoing dispute between neighboring property owners in Sabine County. In this segment, Millard and Barbara Vaughn sued Paul and Mary Drennon for trespass, violation of the water code, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Additionally, the Drennons sued the Vaughns for IIED. The two cases were consolidate

NO. 12-05-00223-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

168 F.3d 478 Lawrence Holzv.Martin Horn, Commissioner, Donald T. Vaughn, Superintendent,Winder, Retired Deputy Superintendent, Mary AnnWilliams, Grievance Coordinator NO. 98-1604 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. October 02, 1998 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa.

6 Cal.4th 666 (1993) 863 P.2d 207 25 Cal. Rptr.2d 137 ANN M., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PACIFIC PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S030815. Supreme Court of California. December 16, 1993. *669 COUNSEL Milton J. Silverman, Lemish & Lewis

PD-1317-15 PD-1317-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/8/2015 5:20:42 PM Accepted 10/9/2015 2:47:13 PM CAUSE NUMBER ________________

411 B.R. 199 (2007) In re Michael Bradley VAUGHN and Carol Elizabeth Vaughn, Debtors eCAST Settlement Corp., Objectant v. Michael Bradley Vaughn and Carol Elizabeth Vaughn, Respondents. No. 1-06-bk-00788MDF. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. June 8, 2007. *201 Donald M. Hahn, Stover McGlaughlin Gerace et al,

*329 ORDER Bonnie S. Vaughn, a Tennessee resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing her civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

03/24/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 4, 2019 Session SHERILYN MARY DAWSON v. DANA LEE DAWSON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 162548-1 John F. Weaver, Chancellor ___________________________________

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 310 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 311 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON On-Briefs September 12, 2007 JAN MARIE VAUGHN v. WILLIAM DANIEL VAUGHN A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 63037 The Honorable J. S. Daniel, Senior Judge No. W2007-00124-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 18, 2008 In this divorce case filed by the Appellee/Mother, she was

VAUGHN, Justice: Defendant-Below/Appellant, Andrea Harrison, appeals from a Superior Court bench ruling which denied her motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. 1 *550 On June 17, 2014, Delaware State Po