Cases

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

NO. 12-17-00222-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CHARISSA ROBERTS, § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT MARY ALICE YARBOROUGH , APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION *Page 3 {¶ 1} Appellant, Peter William Mayes, appeals from the decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas that denied his motion for summary judgment on his motion for modification of sentence.1 For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. {¶ 2} In 2003,

744 N.E.2d 390 (2001) Kenneth MAYES, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49S00-0002-CR-92. Supreme Court of Indiana. March 13, 2001. *391 Paul T. Fulkerson, Skiles & Cook, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Karen M. Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, Grant H. Carlton, Depu

NUMBER 13-10-00650-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARY GRIGSBY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc MARY ELIZABETH ANNE COLEMAN, ) Opinion issued September 20, 2024 KATHLEEN ANNE FORCK, HANNAH ) SUE KELLY AND MARGUERITE ) ANN “PEGGY” FORREST, ) ) Respondents, ) ) v. ) No. SC100742 ) JOHN R. ASHCROFT,

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00351-CV IN RE THE ESTATE OF GLORIA ANN REISTINO, DECEASED From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 78-10-11,729-CV OPINION Appellants contend in their sole issue that the trial court erroneously construed

*155OPINION OF THE COURT Rubin, J. Plaintiffs, lessees and occupants of an apartment owned by defendant UVI Holdings, Inc. and located at 406 West 56th Street, commenced this action to recover damages for their eviction on July 9, 1996, which was previously found to have been wrongful because executed on an invalid warrant. The action is prosecuted ag

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

231 F.Supp.2d 332 (2002) Dennis MAYE, Plaintiff, v. Janet RENO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 00-0271 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 19, 2002. *333 Sheila Anne Lowery-Ferguson, Reuben Burton Collins, II, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Diane Marie Sullivan, Stacy M. Ludwig, Washin

OPINION LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge: Appellant William Raymond Mayes was tried by jury and convicted of Count I, Murder in the First Degree (21 O.S.Supp.1982, § 701.7(A)); and Count II, Conspiracy to commit Murder (21 O.S.1981, § 421), Case No. CRF-89-77, in the District Court of Jefferson County. The jury found the existence of one aggravating circumstance (the murder was especially heinous, a

Affirmed and Opinion filed September 29, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00412-CV ARMOUR PIPE LINE COMPANY, MARY PATRICIA CASHMAN, JOAN CASHMAN, NOREEN CASHMAN, CATHLEEN CASHMAN, AND CAROLINE DECHANT, Appellants V. SANDEL ENERGY, INC., DOUBLE H INVESTMENTS, L.P., LAURA SANDEL GILBREATH, KERCO ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, S

977 P.2d 1073 (1999) 1999 OK 9 STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Robert I. MAYES, Jr., Respondent. No. SCBD 4335. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 16, 1999. As Corrected February 23, 1999. *1075 Janis Hubbard, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar As

707 S.W.2d 951 (1986) Nancy THOMPSON, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Donald Marshall Thompson, Appellant, v. Leonette MAYES, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Jo B. Thompson, Appellee. No. 11-85-267-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. April 3, 1986. Rehearing Denied April 24, 1986.

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this May 27 2015, 8:47 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES Jason M. Kuchmay Stephen R. Snyder Carson Boxberger LLP

OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. Because, in this declaratory judgment action, there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether T.N. Wells and Vicki Wells were bona fide purchasers of a mineral interest, the trial court erred when it granted the Wellses’ motion for summary judgment. For reasons stated in this opinion, the trial court did not

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 19, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00850-CV THE ESTATE OF MARGARET E. KLOVENSKI, JAKE KLOVENSKI, AND MARY HASSLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, Appellants V. ASHISH KAPOOR, M.D., Appellee On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Opinion filed November 30, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-11-00128-CV __________ NEIL EDWARD RICHMOND, MARY RICHMOND CLARK, AND JAMES B. RICHMOND, Appellants V. T.N. WELLS AND VICKI WELLS, Appellees

786 S.W.2d 260 (1990) Diane HAYDEN, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Steven B. (Bruce) Hayden, et al., Petitioners, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. C-9369. Supreme Court of Texas. February 28, 1990. Rehearing Overruled April 25, 1990. *261 K. Michael Mayes, Mary Ann Tu

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARY M. PAWLAKOS, ) ) FILED Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Stewart Chancery-Probate No. P2-024 ) December 2, 1998 VS. ) Appeal No. 01A01-9708-CH-00443 )