⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mary Ann Cruz”

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2013-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 188 P.R. 564
La Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Por primera vez, tras la aprobación de la Ley Púb. Núm. 109-59, infra, tenemos la oportunidad de examinar la controversia siguiente: si de acuerdo con la Cláusula Colectiva de una póliza comercial de automóvil —cuyo asegurado nombrado es una empresa de vehículos de alquiler— la compañía aseguradora responde por los daños que ocasio
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 32× · 713 F.3d 600; 2013 WL 1197898
BLACK, Circuit Judge: We address two Sentencing Guidelines issues which are questions of first impression in this Circuit. First, Jose and Li-sandra Cruz assert the district court erred in enhancing their sentences under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(10), 1 for the use or possession of device-making equipment as they were already
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2020-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 15, 2020 No. 04-19-00500-CV Mary Ann JOHNSON, Appellant v. Chandler Elizabeth JOHNSON and Mary M. Johnson, Appellee
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2020-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 15, 2020 No. 04-19-00500-CV Mary Ann JOHNSON, Appellant v. Chandler Elizabeth JOHNSON and Mary M. Johnson, Appellees
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-09-09 · Published · cited 2× · 270 F.R.D. 499; 2010 WL 3619800
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Decertify filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Dollar Tree”). ECF No. 188.1 Plaintiffs Robert Runnings, Miguel Cruz, and John Hansen (collecti
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District 2015 H-.Y 27 AH °: San Antonio Texas Bexar County / / Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14-00785-CV
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2022-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 27, 2022 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v. Mike DUGI and Mary Ann Dugi, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 2, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v. Mike DUGI and Mary Ann Dugi, Appellees From
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v. Mike DUGI and Mary Ann Dugi, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 30, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v. Mike DUGI and Mary Ann Dugi, Appellees From the 198th
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001-08-21 · Published · cited 213× · 15 Vet. App. 143; 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 951; 2001 WL 950156
IVERS, Judge: Appellant Mema Déla Cruz appeals the January 22, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board), which determined that she was not entitled to recognition as the surviving spouse of a veteran, for purposes of reinstatement of VA death pension benefits. On November 17, 2000, the Court, in a single-judge memorandum decision, affirmed the Board’s decisi
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 20, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 9, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 25, 2021 No. 04-20-00528-CV Alberto MUNIZ and Bridget Muniz, Appellants v. Mike DUGI and Mary Ann Dugi, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District San Antonio Texas Bexar County Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14-00785-CV Trial Court Case 2011 -CI-15957 To The Fourth Court of Justices In Appeals Court STATEMEN
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-04-00540-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG</
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003-10-16 · Published · cited 22× · 160 P.R. Dec. 485
El Juez Presidente Interino Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La fe de la ciudadanía en el sistema de justicia que impera en nuestro País resulta ser imprescindible para su bienestar general. Esa fe se preserva únicamente en la medida en que los ciudadanos confíen en la integridad, honestidad e imparcialidad de quienes tienen la noble en-comienda de impartir justicia. La imparcialidad y objeti
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2006-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-05-00473-CR Mary Cruz CANTU, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. 04-CR-651 Hon
People v. Cruzpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1994-07-14 · Published · cited 214× · 643 N.E.2d 636; 162 Ill. 2d 314; 205 Ill. Dec. 345; 1994 Ill. LEXIS 88
JUSTICE NICKELS, concurring: I agree that the trial court erred in excluding evidence concerning Dugan’s other crimes and I therefore join in the judgment granting Cruz a new trial. However, I write separately because I believe the plurality mechanically applies the evidentiary rules regarding other-crimes eviden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-03-25 · Published · cited 1× · 2021 NY Slip Op 01841
Cruz v Sharkey's Trucking Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 01841) Cruz v Sharkey's Trucking Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 01841 Decided on March 25, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure