Cases

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in rejecting his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, newly discovered evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and other alleged defects in his jury trial. I [¶ 2] In 2006 a jury convicted Gaede

Filed 4/4/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 49 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Alexis Stegall, Defendant and Appell

Filed 8/18/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2011 ND 155 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kyle Steven Pederson, Defendant and

736 N.W.2d 418 (2007) 2007 ND 125 STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Dennis James GAEDE, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20060188. Supreme Court of North Dakota. July 25, 2007. *419 Mark Rainer Boening, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. William Kirschne

672 N.W.2d 829 (2003) CITY OF MARQUETTE, Iowa, Appellee, v. Steven A. GAEDE and Ruth Gaede, Appellants. No. 02-1008. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 17, 2003. *831 Dale L. Putnam of Putnam Law Office, Decorah, for appellants. James A. Garrett of Jacobson, Bristol, Garrett & Swartz, Waukon, for appellee. CARTER,

301 F.Supp.2d 1297 (2004) UNIVERSITY COMMONS-URBANA, LTD., and Capstone Development Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and Reliance Insurance Company, Defendants. Universal Constructors, Inc. and Reliance Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. University Commons-Urbana, Ltd., and Capstone Development Corporation, Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. CV99AR1992S, CIV.A. CV00AR3149S. Unit

480 F.Supp.2d 462 (2007) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a German Company and Hoffmann La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 2007. *463 *464<

494 F.Supp.2d 54 (2007) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a German Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 3, 2007. *55 *56

Filed 4/4/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 41 Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and

643 F.Supp.2d 336 (2008) CONVOLVE, INC. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Plaintiffs, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP. and Seagate Technology LLC, Defendants. No. 00 Civ. 5141(GBD)(JCF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 10, 2008. *338 Tom M. Fini, Debra Brown Steinberg, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP,

VandeWalle, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Human Services appealed from a district court judgment reversing the Department’s order deciding Altru Specialty Services; doing business as Yorhom Medical Essentials, received overpayments for medical .equipment supplied to .Medicaid recipients and ordering recoupment. We conclude the distric

456 F.Supp.2d 267 (2006) AMGEN, INC, Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMAN-LaROCHE LTD, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, & Hoffman LaRoche Inc, Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 20, 2006. *270 Andrew Kumamoto, Firasat Ali, Mary Boyle, Michelle E. Moreland, William G. Gaede, III, McDe

McEvers, Justice. [¶ 1] Richie Wilder appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of murder and from an order partially granting his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Wilder argues his conviction should be reversed and he is entitled to a new trial because his constitutional right to remain silent was violated by the State's improper comments during closing argument. He alternatively argues his senten

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Defendants Compaq Computer Corp. and Seagate Technology LLC bring this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking dismissal of Plaintiff Convolve, Inc.’s Tenth- — -and only remaining — Claim for Relief. (Mot. for Summ. J. (“MSJ”), ECF No. 1029.) Plaintiffs Tenth Claim for Relief seeks damages a

PROST, Chief Judge. Appellants Sanofi, Aventisub LLC, Re-generan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from a final judgment of the district court holding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,829,165 (“’165 patent”) and 8,859,741 (“’741 patent”) not invalid and granting a permanent injunction enjoining sales of Appellants’

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT

REDACTED/PUBLIC VERSION ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Docket No. 29 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge *894Plaintiff 23andMe, Inc. ("23") has filed suit against three affiliated entities - Ancestry.com DNA, LLC; Ancestry.com Op

Filed 8/18/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2011 ND 162 Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent an

2008 ND 203 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Abraham Alvarado, Defendant and Appellant No. 20080107. Supreme Court of North Dakota. Filed November 19, 2008. Marlyce A. Wilder (argued), State's Attorney, and Nicole Foster (on brief), Special Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee. Kent M.

NOTICE 2022 IL App (5th) 200045 Decision filed 11/30/22. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-20-0045 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE