Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Marvin C. Chappell”
Chappell v. Chappellpublic domain
Goolsby, Judge: Marvin S. Chappell appeals from an order that holds him in contempt for failure to pay child support and for attempting to pay the child support in a manner that interfered “with the due administration of justice.” We dismiss Chappell’s appeal. Approximately two weeks after the family court ordered *377Chappell to pay child support
United States v. Chappellpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Marvin Eugene Chappell, federal prisoner # 11775-085, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence based on the amendments to the crack cocaine Guideline. Chappell argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion because he would not be considered a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 if he were resentence
Carlos Avena v. Kevin Chappellpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARLOS J. AVENA, No. 14-99004 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cv-08034-GHK KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. King, District
ACCEPTED 03-17-00674-CV 21645432 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–1235 Submitted April 15, 2021—Filed May 21, 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARVIN M. JORGENSEN, ROXANN WHEATLEY, RICK WHEATLEY, and DALLAS WHEATLEY, Appellants. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Audubon County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge. Two of the ward’s children and the court vis
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1235 Filed November 30, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARVIN M. JORGENSEN, ROXANN WHEATLEY, RICK WHEATLEY, and DALLAS WHEATLEY, Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Audubon County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge. Appellants appeal the district
Chappell v. Statepublic domain
Blackburn, Judge. Defendant Marvin Chappell appeals his conviction by a jury on one count of a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act involving the sale of cocaine. The evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to upholding the jury verdict, shows that on February 11, 1993, an undercover police agent accompanied by an informant approached Chappell in Quit-man, Georgia, and asked him for a “fo
15-25-00060-CV TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. _24-BC11A-002__ § IN THE BUSINESS COURT FILED IN § 15th COURT OF APPEALS § AUSTIN,OF TEXAS
Chappell & Co., Inc. v. Costello's Tavern, Incpublic domain
429 F.Supp.2d 354 (2006) CHAPPELL & CO., INC., et al., Plaintiff, v. COSTELLO'S TAVERN, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-CV-10143-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 14, 2006. *355 Timothy Flaherty, Flaherty & Flaherty, Boston, MA, Thomas J. Griffin, Nelson Griffin, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant
Chappell v. Statepublic domain
209 Ga. 701 (1953) 75 S.E.2d 417 CHAPPELL v. THE STATE. 18151. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued March 9, 1953. Decided April 14, 1953. Reuben A. Garland and Marvin O'Neal Jr., for plaintiff in error. Luther C. Hames Jr., Solicitor-General, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, and J. R. Parham, Assista
Marvin K. Speigner, Jr. v. Willie A. Alexanderpublic domain
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: In this opinion, we decide whether a suit for injunctive relief based on a personnel decision can be brought against the Alabama National Guard (“Alabama Guard”). The district court dismissed the claim as nonjusticiable. We AFFIRM. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff-Appellant Marvin K. Speigner, Jr., a white male,
Marvin K. Speigner, Jr. v. Willie A. Alexanderpublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _______________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 24,
OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice In this permissive appeal we are asked to construe a 1927 mineral deed. The 1927 deed is only seven paragraphs long, and no party claims it is ambiguous. But, the parties have widely different interpretations concerning what interests the deed conveyed and the size of those interests. The Appellants are the successors in
O'Hara v. Kimbrellpublic domain
Elisha J. O'Hara III appeals a judgment as a matter of law entered in favor of James D. Kimbrell, Jr., and M M Builders, Inc. On April 14, 1994, O'Hara sued Kimbrell and M M Builders, asserting claims of negligence and wantonness arising out of a December 3, 1993, motor vehicle accident. O'Hara alleged that Kimbrell, while acting in the line and scope of his employment, was driving an M M Builders truck, which he caused, or allowed, to collide with O'Hara's automobile. Thereaft
Grubb v. Yacoubpublic domain
By Judge Robert J. Smith This matter comes before the Court on a surviving spouse’s petition, pursuant to Virginia Code § 64.1-16.2, for Determination of Elective Share of Augmented Estate and the Ratable Portion of the Elective Share Attributable to Each Person Liable to Contribution (the “Petition”) filed by Petitioner John C. Grubb (“Petitioner”), on behalf of The Estate of Marvin J. Grubb (“Marvin”). Va. Code § 64.1-16.2
Schlup v. Bourdonpublic domain
33 Kan.App. 2d 564 (2005) 105 P.3d 720 THELMA LOUISE SCHLUP, Appellee, v. JOHN BOURDON and ALICE BOURDON, Appellants. No. 92,450. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed February 11, 2005. *565 John C. Chappell, of Lawrence, for appellants. Price T. Banks, of Lawrence, for appellee.<
Patrick Michaels v. Howard W. Chappellpublic domain
PER CURIAM This action, for abuse of process and “violation of constitutional rights” was commenced in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. Upon motion of the defendant the action was removed to the federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). A motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which
Marvin Worth Productions v. Superior Films Corp.public domain
319 F.Supp. 1269 (1970) MARVIN WORTH PRODUCTIONS, Douglas International Corporation and Sally Marr, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Lenny Bruce, Plaintiffs, v. SUPERIOR FILMS CORPORATION, Herbert S. Altman and Budco Distributing Corp., Defendants. No. 70 Civ. 3558. United States District Court, S. D. New York. September 30, 1970.
671 S.E.2d 693 (2008) WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Division of Highways, Respondent Below, Appellee, v. PARKERSBURG INN, INC., Petitioner Below, Appellant. No. 33882. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted October 8, 2008. Decided November 5, 2008. *697 Marvin W. Masters, April D. Fer
Vanegas v. American Energy Servicespublic domain
224 S.W.3d 544 (2007) Ed VANEGAS, Jimmy D. Halman, Sam Armstrong, Alex Carbajal, Roger Farrington, Curtis Huff, and Tito Betancur, Appellants, v. AMERICAN ENERGY SERVICES, Niewoehner Partnership, L.P., RCH/HSJ/CCM/MCP I, L.P., Autry Stephens, John Carnett, Brack Blackwood, and Dennie Martin, Appellees. No. 11-06-00118-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. May 10, 2007.