⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Martinez-Lopez v. Reid”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2024-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-23-00325-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG EUGENE L. REID, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 319TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-05-20 · Published · cited 2× · 751 F.3d 763; 2014 WL 2053824; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9295
*765 OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Calvin Reid, a man in his late forties, took J.H., a girl in her early teens, across state lines to have sex with her. We affirm his resulting conviction under the Mann Act and his sentence. I. J.H.
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2002-05-06 · Published · cited 8× · 46 P.3d 1237; 132 N.M. 237; 2002 NMSC 015
OPINION MINZNER, Justice. {1} Defendants Marianne Matheny Reid and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeal from an interlocutory order, properly certified for immediate review, see NMSA 1978, § 39-3^t(A) (1999), in which the trial court withdrew an earlier order bifurcating a negligence trial arising from an automobile accident. The Court of Appeals, after ac
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998-01-07 · Published · cited 62× · 133 F.3d 111; 1998 WL 2590
133 F.3d 111 75 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1217,73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,332,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23940RAMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Radames CARDOZA-RODRIGUEZ, Marta Elaine Coll-Figueroa,Isabel De La Paz, Maria D. Garcia-Caceres, ErnestoLopez-Garcia Ana L. Marin De Rivero, Carmen AnaMartinez-Rivera Carmen Alicia Mattos, Guillermo Ortiz-Rosa,Margarita Santiago-Negron and Margarita Zequeira-Jul
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-04-03 · Published · cited 44× · 208 F.3d 1085
208 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2000) KATHLEEN KLEM, ROSEMARY KNOX,PATRICIA CHRISTMAN, and LINDA SHADWELL, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,CALIFORNIA,Defendant-Appellant.HAROLD ASSENZA, JOHN CARLSON,SHARON COOLEY, NANCY S.BENNETT, DOUG WILLIS, ALFONSO M. HACKETT, ROBERT CARGILL, ARMENIA CHAVEZ, DIANA ORTIZ-LOPEZ, ZONIA BEECHER, AMANDO CABLAS, KATHRYN CANTER, MARY CLESI, ANGELIKA
Almeda v. Blubaumpublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 1975-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 400 F. Supp. 177; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16160
400 F.Supp. 177 (1975) Margarito Rueda ALMEDA, Petitioner, v. Paul BLUBAUM, Sheriff, Maricopa County, Arizona, Respondent. Manuel Gallegos MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Paul BLUBAUM, etc., Respondent. Epimenio LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Paul BLUBAUM, etc., Respondent. Jesus CHAVIRA, Petitioner, v. Paul BLUBAUM, etc., Respondent. Nos. Civ. 75-240, Civ. 75-227, Civ. 75-262 and Civ. 75-298.
Texas Supreme Court · 2017-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 17-0448 12/21/2017 4:53 PM tex-21448027 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023-11-09 · Published · cited 15× · 86 F.4th 443
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1780 LILIAN EUGENIA VARELA-CHAVARRIA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Kayatta, Howard, and Rikelm
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-12-07 · Published · cited 0× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 362
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Defendant, Malcolm Brown, moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(B) on the ground that the underlying deportation order was based on the erroneous conclusion that he was ineligible for voluntary departure. Def. Mem., ECF No. 14. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Defendant,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED Electronically Filed 04-15-00536-CV 8/11/2015 5:15:49 PM FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS Noe Guerra Jr., District Clerk SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2025-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-24-00061-CV KEVIN W. MATTHEWS, Appellant V. NALCO COMPANY, LLC D/B/A ECOLAB, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D22-30319-CV Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Just
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-07-09 · Published · cited 13× · 114 F. Supp. 3d 1030; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93577; 2015 WL 4275391
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [71] The Honorable BEVERLY REID' O’CONNELL, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles (the “County”) and Sheriff Leroy D. Baca.1 (Dkt. No. 71.) Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF No. 23-4072 AMERICA, D.C. No. 5:22-cr-00021- Plaintiff - Appellee, RGK-1 v. ORDER CERTIFYING ANTHONY VALENTINO Q
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ HOLLY LAWSON, │
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2023-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00236-CR ___________________________ DORIAN RAY WOODARD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 371st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1671445D Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach
State v. Lopezpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019-01-10 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 UT App 11; 438 P.3d 950
CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge: ¶1 Defendant Andre Gustavo Henry Lopez appeals his convictions for rape, object rape, and assault. Defendant argues that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel and that the cumulative effect of counsel's errors deprived him of a fair trial. We reject each of Defendant's arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 494 S.W.3d 854; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3705; 2016 WL 1444220
OPINION William J. Boyce, Justice As part of a plea agreement, appellant Jordan Dwayne Nichols pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor offense of possession of drug paraphernalia. More than two years later, appellant filed a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus contending that his guilty plea was involuntary because trial counsel rendered ineffective assistan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-04-03 · Published · cited 12× · 208 F.3d 1085; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2578; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3499; 5 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1796; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5996
GRABER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiffs, who are managers and registered nurses employed by defendant County of Santa Clara, filed actions seeking overtime pay under the FLSA. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that it could correct its failures to comply with the relevant administrative rules through the regulatory “window of
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
20-3224; 22-70 Black v. Decker; G.M. v. Decker In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 (Argued: January 5, 2023 Decided: May 31, 2024) No. 20-3224 CAROL WILLIAMS BLACK,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 353 F. Supp. 3d 76
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Ryan Flynn ("Defendant") moves this Court to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the interception of wire communications and the search of Defendant's home. For the reasons stated below, Defendant's *79motion (Docket No. 56) is denied. Backg