Cases

138 Nev., Advance Opinion Hq IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ROSIB AL: AND HENRY Q,, Se, 63029 . i 4s , - ae Sppetian - FILED : [ONACTO AL TRL. Respondent. - JUN 30 2022 ELizaprT A BROWH AY — Wier GEPUTYT CLERK, Appeal from a district court order in a paternity and child custody matter. Eighth Judicial District Court. Family Court Division, Clark Caunty: Nadin Cutter, Judge, Affirnied., B MeFarling Law Group and Emily MeFarling, Las Vegas, for Respondent. BEFORE

393 Mass. 612 (1985) 473 N.E.2d 167 COMMONWEALTH vs. LARITA WELCH MARTINEZ. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 3, 1984. January 7, 1985. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Calvin J. Wier for the defendant. Robert N. Tochka, Assistant District Attorney, for t

For a statement of the nature and result of this suit we shall adopt that contained in the brief of appellants. This suit was instituted by the appellee, Victoria Pena, in the 73rd District Court of Bexar County, Texas, being a suit for damages growing out of alleged personal injuries sustained on May 18, 1938, while appellee was crossing in the 1,000 block of West Houston Street, within the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, at a point other than at an intersection, and was struck by

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant in the court below, and said parties will be designated herein as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Plaintiff sued defendant in trespass to try title, claiming title by the statute of ten years' limitation to a tract of land 20 fee by 30 feet, fronting on Burk street, and by fee-simple title to a tract of land 5 feet × 125 feet, a part of a tract of land 105 feet × 155 feet, being known and identified as city

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Robert E. Wier, United States Magistrate Judge Movant, Adrian Campbell, is a federal inmate. DE # 131 (Motion), at 1. On May 18, 2016,1 Campbell filed a pro se2 motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as well as a memorandum of law. See id.; DE # 131-1. The United States responded in opposition. DE # 139 (Response).

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR., On Nos. 14-16601 Behalf of Himself and All Others 14-17068 Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-03329- v. CW NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, AKA The NCAA, OPINION Defenda

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0230p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plai

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0044p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00282-CV ___________________________ HAROLD MILLER, Appellant V. CONFORMIS, INC. AND JOSEPH BERMAN, Appellees On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 348-298642-18 Before Sudderth, C.J.; B

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0189p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB 1 Everyone agrees that the Fifth Amendment prohibits compelling a defendant's testimony, but does not preclude evidence of the defendant's physical characteristics, Still, where a trial court orders a defendant to speak solely for voice identification by the jury, does the procedure involve improper testimonial or proper physical evidence? And even if the identification involves only physical

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2030 Doc: 68 Filed: 08/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 56 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2030 KESHA T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STACEY A. KINCAID, in her official capacity; XIN WANG, NP

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2030 Doc: 68 Filed: 08/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 56 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2030 KESHA T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STACEY A. KINCAID, in her official capacity; XIN WANG, NP

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0182p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment: I concur in the judgment affirming Defendants’ convictions and sentences. But, with respect, I dissent from the holding that the government violated Defendants’ Fourth Amendment rights. The majority concludes that the government did so when it obtained, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) court ord

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0253p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-

203 P.3d 857 (2009) 2009-NMSC-008 Diana CORTEZ, Petitioner-Petitioner, v. Sergio Rene CORTEZ, Respondent-Respondent. No. 30,717. Supreme Court of New Mexico. February 20, 2009. *858 Rosner & Chavez, L.L.C., Mary W. Rosner, Las Cruces, NM, for Petitioner. Keithly & English, P.C., Shane A. Eng

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0031p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap

479 F.Supp.2d 1196 (2007) Daniel D. MOSHER, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-2001-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 19, 2007. *1197 Patrick E. Henderson, Henderson Law Office, Atchison, KS, for Plaintiff.