Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1279 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1280 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

Filed 6/19/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ABELARDO MARTINEZ, D075360 (Consolidated with D076055) Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 3

Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge SILVERMAN; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH *924OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Under California law, a member of the general public may not carry a concealed weapon in public unless, he or she has bee

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 290 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 291 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

THOMAS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In its landmark decision in Heller, the Supreme Court held that a complete ban on handgun possession in the home violated the Second Amendment. District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). In doing so, it reminded us that: “the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” and that it “was not a right t

McCONNELL, P. J. *1182I INTRODUCTION Oregon State University (Oregon State) petitions for a peremptory writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate an order overruling Oregon State's demurrer to George A. Sutherland's first amended complaint (complaint) and to enter a new order sustaining the demu

608 F.3d 406 (2010) Michael CROWE; Stephen Crowe; Cheryl A. Crowe; Judith Ann Kennedy; Shannon Crowe, a minor, through guardian ad litem Stephan Crowe; Zachary Treadway; Joshua David Treadway; Michael Lee Treadway; Tammy Treadway; Janet Haskell; Margaret Susan Houser; Christine Huff; Gregg Houser; Aaron Houser, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; The City of Oceanside; Chris McDonough; Gary Hoover; Summer Stephan; Lawrence Blum; City of

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER The opinion filed on January 14, 2010, 2010 WL 114956, is hereby amended as follows. The paragraph beginning at the bottom of Slip. Op. page 1115 and continuing onto page 1116 is to be deleted and the following inserted. We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to: (1) Michael and Aaron’s Fif

NARES, J. *545Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 411.35 requires the attorney for plaintiffs or cross-complainants in certain professional negligence cases to serve and file a certificate on the defendant or cross-defendant on or before the date of service of the complaint or cross-complaint declaring that he or she

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LUCAS GONCALVES, a minor, by and No. 15-55010 through his Guardian Ad Litem, Tony Goncalves, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:14-cv-01774- GPC-BGS v. RADY CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL SAN OPINION DIEGO; DOES, 1 through 30, Inclusive, Defendants,

359 F.Supp.2d 994 (2005) Michael CROWE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. And Related Actions No. 99CV0241 R (RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 28, 2005. *995 *996 *997

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). (Dkt. No. 29.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on July 13, 2018. (Dkt. No. 32.) Defendant filed a reply on July 27, 2018. (Dkt. No. 38.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss. Background</

303 F.Supp.2d 1050 (2004) Michael CROWE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. And Related Actions No. 99CV0241 R(RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 17, 2004. *1057 Milton J Silverman, Jr., Law Offices of Milton Silverman, San Diego, CA, counsel for Crowe plaintiffs.

Filed 4/7/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DESIREE MARTINEZ, F082914 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG03855) v. CITY OF CLOVIS et al., OPINIO

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 847 OPINION County of San Diego (County) paid benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program to Catherine Lamb's minor daughter, Sarah, after Sarah left Catherine's home and had a baby.1 Catherine appeals from a judgme

990 F.Supp. 1230 (1998) Ann PRICE et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., Defendants. Civil No. 94-1917-R (AJB). United States District Court, S.D. California. January 8, 1998. *1231 *1232 *1233 *1234 Charles

Filed 11/10/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NIEVES MARTINEZ, B305826 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. BC667123) CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from judgment of the Superior Court of Los A

Filed 12/30/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H046164 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1518585) v. MONICA MARIE MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. Defen

Filed 11/15/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MARY ANNA WHITEHALL, Plaintiff and Respondent, E065672 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1513975) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

RAMIREZ, P.J. *357Plaintiff, Mary Anna Whitehall, was a social worker for the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS or the County) who sought legal advice pertaining to any liability she might have for submitting misleading information and doctored photographs to the juvenile court at the direction of her superiors. Her counse