Cases

601 F.Supp.2d 865 (2009) Nicolas Leandro MARTINEZ, Individually, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Gloria Martinez, Deceased; Christina Marie Ortiz; Carmen Rachel Ortiz; and Miguel Antonio Ortiz v. Cesar H. PORTA, M.D.; Ramasamy Selvaraj, M.D.; Scott Williamson, M.D.; and United Regional Health Care System, Inc., d/b/a United Regional Health Care System. Action No. 4:03-CV-915-Y.

598 F.Supp.2d 807 (2009) Nicolas Leandro MARTINEZ, Individually, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Gloria Martinez, Deceased; Christina Marie Ortiz; Carmen Rachel Ortiz; and Miguel Antonio Ortiz v. Cesar H. PORTA, M.D.; Ramasamy Selvaraj, M.D.; Scott Williamson, M.D.; and United Regional Health Care System, Inc., d/b/a United Regional Health Care System. Action No. 4:03-CV-915-Y.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Staten Island University Hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated December 15, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Staten Island Univer

LAGOA, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent as I find that the plaintiff did not prove valid service under the substituted service provision of section 48.031(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), and I would remand for further proceedings as set forth below. Section 48.031(l)(a), which must be strictly construed, only allows for substitute service by “leaving the copies at [the defendant’s]

MEMORANDUM ** Mynor Amilcar Naj era-Porta, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When, as here, the BIA affirms the IJ’s decision without opinion, this court’s review focuses on the merits of

Opinion by Judge NEY. Porta-Pacific Corporation (Porta-Pacific) seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) insofar as it affirmed the finding of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that Porta-Pa-cific was the statutory employer of Frederick Smithers (claimant) and, thus, was liable for benefits awarded to claimant. We affirm in part and reverse in part. C

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROACH, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a case brought by Plaintiffs under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), Title 42, USCA § 1399(d)(B) properly called the “Anti-Dumping Act.” Plaintiffs are the survivors of Troy Lee Aylor (“Aylor”) who died shortly after being discharged from the Emergency Room of United Regional Health Care System (“Ho

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendants Jayesh R. Mehta, Brijender Batra, and Pulmonary Consultants, PC., doing business as Pulmonary Consultants, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. In opposition to those defendants’ prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the *930plaintiff raised a triable issue of

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendants Jayesh R. Mehta, Brijender Batra, and Pulmonary Consultants, PC., doing business as Pulmonary Consultants, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. In opposition to those defendants’ prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the *930plaintiff raised a triable issue of

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, and spoliation of evidence, the defendant North Shore University Hospital appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated October 25, 2011, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendants Solaima Soukkary and F

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, and spoliation of evidence, the defendant North Shore University Hospital appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated October 25, 2011, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendants Solaima Soukkary and F

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Saint Vincent’s Catholic Medical Centers of New York, sued herein as Sisters of Charity Medical Center and St. Vincent’s Medical Center of Richmond, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 22, 2009, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PATRICIA W. GRIFFIN CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Final Report: March 17, 2020

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered April 11, 2011, as, pursuant to an order of the same court entered August 24, 2010, and resettled nunc pro tunc as of June 22, 2010, (a) granted that branch of the motion of the defendants George L. Hines and Winthrop Cardiovascular & Thora

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered April 11, 2011, as, pursuant to an order of the same court entered August 24, 2010, and resettled nunc pro tunc as of June 22, 2010, (a) granted that branch of the motion of the defendants George L. Hines and Winthrop Cardiovascular & Thora

*682In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), entered April 24, 2009, which granted the motion of the defendant Good Samaritan Hospital for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the

ACCEPTED FILED 13-15-00106-cv IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on May 5, 2008, 276 Fed.Appx. 708, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum is being filed concurrently with this order. Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file the petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot because she timely filed the petition for panel rehearing. <

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on May 5, 2008, 276 Fed.Appx. 708, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum is being filed concurrently with this order. Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file the petition for panel rehearing is denied as moot because she timely filed the petition for panel rehearing. <