Cases

Opinion BAXTER, J. Plaintiff, a deputy public defender, was investigated by his employer, the county, upon allegations that he had made deceptive statements to the court while representing a criminal defendant. During each of several attempts to interview plaintiff in the matter, a supervising attorney directed plaintiff to answer questions about the incident, told plaintiff that his refusal to cooperate would

53 Cal.Rptr.3d 357 (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 914 Thomas SPIELBAUER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H029345. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. January 12, 2007. *359 Burnett, Burnett & Allen, Douglas B. Allen, San Jose, for Plaintiff a

GRABER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiffs, who are managers and registered nurses employed by defendant County of Santa Clara, filed actions seeking overtime pay under the FLSA. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that it could correct its failures to comply with the relevant administrative rules through the regulatory “window of

Filed 11/27/19; Certified for Publication 12/19/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JOHN DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant, E071224 v. (Super.Ct.No. BLC1600160) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Plaintiff Angelica Garduño Arpin (“Arpin”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Santa Clara County (“County”), Santa Clara County Sheriffs Department (“Sheriffs Department”), Officer R. Stone (“Stone”), and Officer D. Barnes (“Barnes”) (jointly “County Defendants”) on her claims of false arrest and imprisonment in violation of state law, excessive force in violation of

Filed 9/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) ---- MICHAEL VERN MURCHISON, C090060 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 16CI000101) v. COUNTY OF TEHAMA et

261 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 2001) ANGELICA GARDUNO ARPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTv.SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, A PUBLIC ENTITY; SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AN AGENCY OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY; R.STONE, OPINION #1252; D. BARNES, #1150, MEMBERS OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES No. 99-16118 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT</

*420 Opinion DUARTE, J. — The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appeals from a judgment in favor of the Siskiyou County Farm Bureau (Farm Bureau), interpreting a statute requiring notification when an entity plans to “substantially divert” water from a river or stream.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES GUND et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF TRINITY et al., Defendants and Respondents. S249792 Third Appellate District C076828 Trinity County Superior Court 11CV080 August 27, 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MONICA MARIE MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. S267138 Sixth Appellate District H046164 Santa Clara County Superior Court C1518585 August 24, 2023 Justice Kruger

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA JIMMY E., ) ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18479/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE CHEROKEE NATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-2167 (TJK) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs are four Native American tribes who each operate casinos in Oklahoma under a tribal

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAFAEL MATEOS SANDOVAL; No. 16-16122 SIMEON AVENDANO RUIZ, individually and as class D.C. No. representatives, 3:11-cv-05817- Plaintiffs-Appellees, TEH v. COUNTY OF SONOMA; SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; STEVE FREITAS, Defendants, and CITY OF SANTA ROSA; SA

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTEN SILLOWAY; CHRISTA No. 22-16079 DURAN; BRIGITTA VAN EWIJK, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:20-cv-07400-RS v. OPINION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellee. TATYANA LITVINOVA, No. 22-16568 individual

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS., LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge Plaintiff Jessica Blanco filed this action against Defendants City of Lemoore (“the *990City”), Lemoore Police Department Officer Kevin Cosper (“Cosper”) in his official and private capacity, the County of Kings

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0048 Submitted January 21, 2021—Filed April 16, 2021 DAVID MICHAEL JOHNSTON, Appellant, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge. Driver appeals dismissal of his petition to review agency action revoking his driver’s license as a

24 Cal.Rptr.3d 72 (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 43 CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Maria STEWART, Defendant and Respondent, Douglas Heller, et al., Intervenors and Respondents. Rene Amy, Plaintiff, v. City of Pasadena, et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Respondents, Paul Monsour, et al., Intervenors, Cross-Defendants and Appellants. Nos. B159223, B164794, B160037

Opinion ALDRICH, J. AIDS Healthcare Foundation and Michael Weinstein (collectively the Foundation) filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the health officer of the Department of Public Health for the County of Los Angeles (the Department) to issue a regulatory order that requires adult film industry performers to wear condoms in the production of hardcore pornography and to obtain hepatitis B

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS; No. 23-15087 TORO CASTANO; SARAH CRONK; JOSHUA DONOHOE; MOLIQUE D.C. No. FRANK; DAVID MARTINEZ; 4:22-cv-05502- TERESA SANDOVAL; DMR NATHANIEL VAUGHN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCI