Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ALVINA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v CASE NO. SX-1999-CV-00507 NORMAN HENRY MARTIN ACTION FOR ACCOUNTING DAMAGES AND RESTRAIN Defendant. COMMISSION OF WASTE, AND FOR

610 S.E.2d 509 (2005) 279 Ga. 197 MARTIN et al. v. HENRY COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE AUTHORITY. No. S04A1795. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 7, 2005. Reconsideration Denied April 14, 2005. *510 Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White & Williams, Atlanta, Eric C. White, Richard N. Hubert, Charles C

USCA11 Case: 22-10742 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2023 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10742 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0037p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MCCORD HENRY, Personal Representative of the │ Estate of Linda Henry,

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC20-1404 ____________ HENRY MARTIN STEIGER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. November 10, 2021 LAWSON, J. We accepted review of the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Steiger v

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. A jury of the State of Michigan convicted petitioner-appellant Scott D. Henry of discharge of a firearm in an occupied structure and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. After exhausting his appeals in state court, Henry petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denie

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER OF ABATEMENT Appellate case name: Virg Thomas and Thorp Springs Enterprises, LLC v. Henry Philley, Velma A. Philley, and Martin Amador Appellate case number: 01-19-00270-CV Trial court case number: C2018064 Trial court: 355th District Court of Hood County The t

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Virg Thomas v. Henry Philley, Velma A. Philley, and Martin Amador Appellate case number: 01-19-00270-CV Trial court case number: C2018064 Trial court: 355th District Court of Hood County Appellant, Vig Thomas, has filed an unopposed motion requesting that our Cour

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION OF THE COURT Jonah Triebwasser, J. This proceeding, brought pursuant to section 713 (6) of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, seeks to have the respondent evicted from premises at 129 Orlich Road in the Town of Red Hook, Dutchess County, State of New York. A trial was held on September 2, 2016. Petitioner filed a memorandum of law on September 16, 2016. Respondent filed a memorandum of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-CA-00114-SCT THE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. JOHN HENRY MARTIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF MARTHA MARTIN, YASHICA GOOD, INDIVIDUALLY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/13/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WINSTON L. KIDD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOSEPH

240 F.3d 239 (3rd Cir. 2001) HENRY FAHY,v.MARTIN HORN, COMMISSIONER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CONNER BLAINE, JR., SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE, AND; JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ,SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW, Martin Horn; Conner Blaine, Jr.; Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz, Appellants. No. 99-9007 UNITED STATE

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT TREVON HENRY, ) ) Appellant, ) WD84685 v. ) ) OPINION FILED: )

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

MANION, Circuit Judge. During Henry Martin’s trial for bank robbery he asserted as part of his defense that because he was financially secure he had no motive to rob the bank. While cross-examining Martin, the prosecutor inquired about an apparent inconsistency between Martin’s assertion of financial security and the indigence he claimed in the financial disclosure form which he

RODOLFO RUIZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter involves application of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to bar Plaintiff, Johanna Maria Vibe Ener ("Ener"), from seeking relief in the Southern District of Florida. On April 26, 2019, Defendant, Pedro Martin ("Martin"), filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint and Request for Expedited Ruling (the "Motion to Dismiss") [ECF No. 6 ], which maintains that

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District PAULA WYRICK, ) ) Respondent, ) WD82557 ) v. ) OPINION FILED:

OPINION OF THE COURT (September 15, 2010) Per Curiam. Appellant Norman Henry Martin (hereafter “Norman”) challenges three Superior Court orders entered on October 23, 2002, September 7, 2007, and September 28, 2007. Specifically, Norman argues that the Superior Court erred when it: (1) granted partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee Alvina M. Martin (hereafter “Alvina”); (2) denied No

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. On December 23, 2013, this Court ruled in no uncertain terms that: “Article 15, Section 11, of the Ohio Constitution, and Ohio Revised Code Section 3101.01(C) [Ohio’s “marriage recognition bans”], violate rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Un