Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Martin v. Cates”
Cates v. Chiangpublic domain
Opinion HALLER, Acting P. J. In 2003, Candace Cates brought a taxpayer action against several defendants, including the California Gambling Control Commission (Commission) and California’s State Controller (Controller), alleging these entities had failed to discharge their mandatory statutory duties to collect money derived from gambling owed to the state by various Indian tribes. After Cates engaged in inde
Cervantes v. Catespublic domain
76 P.3d 449 (2003) 206 Ariz. 178 Anthony Jon CERVANTES, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Jeffrey S. CATES, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 03-0157. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. September 23, 2003.
Martin v. Awvepublic domain
*891OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Appellant Leslie E. Martin, III appeals two final decisions by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, One decision granted appel-lee Jeanne Awve relief from the automatic bankruptcy stay so that she could enforce her rights under a judgment of divorce
Cates v. Statepublic domain
David Newbern, Judge. Douglas Cates was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. He contends the evidence against him was insufficient to have been permitted to go to the jury; thus, his motion for directed verdict should have been granted. He also contends the Trial Court erred in rejecting his contention that he was being tried in the wrong county. As Mr. Cates prese
Martin v. Catepublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Martin v. Catepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 590.
Abernethy v. Catespublic domain
182 Ga. App. 456 (1987) 356 S.E.2d 62 ABERNETHY et al. v. CATES et al. 73472. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 17, 1987. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1987. *461 Robert M. Martin, Leslie A. Dent, for appellants. J. Garland Peek, for appellees. BENHAM, Judg
City of Dallas v. Martinpublic domain
214 S.W.3d 638 (2006) CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant, v. David S. MARTIN, et al., Appellees. City of Dallas, Appellant, v. George G. Parker, et al., Appellees. Nos. 05-03-01310-CV, 05-03-01334-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. December 21, 2006. Rehearing Overruled February 22, 2007. *640 James Pinson
Flinchbaugh v. Catespublic domain
v i£~.y»f?».`l’wi“‘ii'f’ §,"§$§§’S§Y'A§z"-Y@ §:`~?i;'”i‘ wi N()T FOR PUBLlC/\Tl()N IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REP()RTS ANI) PAC[I*`IC RE'I’()R'I`P`.R NO. 29929 lN THE lNTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIdf MICHAEL P. FLINCHBAUGH, Plaintiff~Appellee, 1 JOHN R. CATES, Defendant~Appellant pi z"`$ ‘; §§ ,‘€:~=‘ §.;e~e *" §§ APPEAL FROM THB CIRCUIT CGURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 05-l~lO22) ORDER DlSMlSSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Nakamura, Chief
Ciarleglio v. Martinpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
State v. Martinpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) I.D. No. 1702005493 ) Cr. A. Nos. PN17-02-1754, etc. DARNELL D. MARTIN, ) Defendant. ) Submitted: August 24, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022 Upon Remand from the Supreme Court of Delaware,
State v. Martinpublic domain
653 Argued and submitted May 3; decision of Court of Appeals and judgment of circuit court affirmed December 30, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. DEANGELO FRANKLIN MARTIN, Petitioner on Review. (CC 18CR25299, 18CR31500) (CA A169801 (Control), A169803)
League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. Martinpublic domain
201 P.3d 517 (2009) LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS, Petitioner, v. Dean MARTIN, Arizona State Treasurer, in his official capacity and Janet Napolitano, Governor of the State of Arizona, Respondents. No. CV-08-0379-SA. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. February 3, 2009. *518 Perkins, Coie, Brown, & Bain, P.A. by Paul F. E
Cates v. Creamerpublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Insofar as the majority opinion upholds the district court’s grant of a new trial to Cates and, consequently, the verdict of the second trial, I concur. However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority’s opinion that holds that Florida law applies to the issue of vicarious liability-
Cates v. Public Employee Retirement Systempublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant, Anne Cates, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellees Public Employee Retirement System of Nevada, Dana Bilyeu, Tina Leiss, and Holly Zimmermann (collectively, “PERS”) in Cates’s employment action against PERS. Cates alleged that she was retaliated against and constructively discharged from her employment because she filed workplace grievances after re
Sylvester v. Martin (In Re Martin)public domain
130 B.R. 930 (1991) In the Matter of: William W. MARTIN, Sr., Debtor. Philip R. SYLVESTER and National Flour Company of Wisconsin, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. William W. MARTIN, Sr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89 B 9796, Adv. No. 89 A 842. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 5, 1991. *931
Cates v. Catespublic domain
JUSTICE HOWERTON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff was riding in a car driven by her father, who was divorced from her mother, who had custody. She and her father were on their way to a circus, but when it began to rain, they decided to drive to her father’s home, instead. On the way, her father drove from Illinois
Cates v. Public Employee Retirement Systempublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Appellant, Anne Cates, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellees Public Employee Retirement System of Nevada, Dana Bilyeu, Tina Leiss, and Holly Zimmermann (collectively, “PERS”) in Cates’s employment action against PERS. Cates alleged that she was retaliated against and constructively discharged from her employment because she filed workplace grievances after re
Keats v. Catespublic domain
100 Ill. App.2d 177 (1968) 241 N.E.2d 645 Edgar S. Keats and The Northern Trust Company, as Co-Executors of the Last Will of Max L. Keats, Deceased, and of the Last Will of Clara H. Keats, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Sandra A. Cates and Title Insurance and Trust Company, a California Corporation, as Executor and Trustee Under the Last Will of Samuel D. Cates, Deceased, Defendants-Appellants, and Loren Kramer, Victor
Esther Martin v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Jan 09 2024, 8:38 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals